Here We Go Again
Israel's blockade is big in the news. Israel demands to inspect all ships delivering supplies to Palestine, logically, because rockets are being launched from Palestine on Israel. Thugs on one of those ships with terrorist connections attacked Israeli inspectors with pipes and clubs. Nine were killed by the Israelis. The sentiment is with defiance of the blockade. The news is that another ship is heading for Palestine and planning on defying the Israelis.
What has the United States, since Obama's election, accomplished in peace efforts? Name anything at all that Obama has done to strengthen America's standing in the world, in the economic situation, or in uniting the American people.
If you don't like America, you should love Obama and hate me. Read what I think and let me know where we disagree. The Obama plan now in place isn’t new. It is as old as the hills. It follows the usual course of action when a people are not vigilant in the battle to remain free. The object of ObamaCare and such is to leave the American people bankrupt, morally, spiritually, and financially; with no way to turn but to an Obama led government.
Why would any sane person want to destroy America’s values and principles? I can answer the question in one word: power. Power is a drive in all sentient beings. A drive is devoid of reason or the law. Throughout recorded history, when granted great power man reverts to the law of the jungle. This describes the progressive movement or government control.
The idea in America was to form a union of states for a common defense, to establish justice, to insure domestic tranquility, to promote the general welfare, and to secure the blessings of liberty for ourselves and prosperity; that is, the white people in said states. This was essential to the forming of the union. Call it like it is. It was downright contemptible of white America to demand such as this in a written constitution.
Case in point: The Taney Court, mind you, according to the Constitution, ruled that Dred Scott, an escaped black slave, was a white man’s property, the same as a mule or a cow. It’s hard to imagine this kind of law now but that was the written law, in direct contradiction of “all men created equal.” This kind of law ultimately led to the Civil War and the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. We, the American people, for expediency’s sake, ended paying a terrible price. It turned out not to be for the good of all that we, the people, allowed for slavery, yet we have not learned the lesson. The powers that be are at it again.
Case in point: In the case of Joseph W. Smith, Jr., Petitioner, vs Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent, on Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, case number 1540 in the Supreme Court of the United States October Term, 1980, in my pleadings before the Court, I cited President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s declaration in 1933. “While it isn’t written in the Constitution, nevertheless, it is the inherent duty of the Federal Government to keep its citizens from starvation.” I cited FDR’s declaration in 1937. “The balance of power between the three great branches of the Federal Government has been tipped out of balance by the courts in direct contradiction of the high purposes of the framers of the Constitution. We have reached the point where we must take action to save the Constitution from the Court.” I cited Justice Brandeis reasoning. “Property is only a means. It has been a frequent error of our Court that they have made the means the end.” FDR, the Democrats in Congress, and the Court, through New Deal law, made the law the end justifies the means. President Obama says he is a Roosevelt Democrat.
The Supreme Court refused to hear my case. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue is permitted to make limitless “mistakes.” It is all in the court record. Shades of the past, for the good of all, the same as in the case of the escaped slave Dred Scott, under New Deal law the IRS can mistakenly tax me out of existence. President Obama, a Democratic Congress, and an activist Supreme Court are systematically doing away with my America in favor of a one-world government.
Early man looked to the heavens and saw movement. The movements caused the seasons, the seasons affecting humanity. This fact of nature put thoughts in man’s mind of a supernatural force of the universe, and man’s imagination that this force of nature empowered certain of us to lead others. Now comes Obama, Pelosi, Reid, the U.S. Supreme Court, and me, an insignificant pipsqueak, with the thought that I have God-given rights. As the court record reveals, I was clearly mistaken. It’s back to the law of the jungle. The individual citizen in America enjoys no more rights than the escaped black slave Dred Scott. For all practical purposes, my case before the federal judiciary proved conclusively that I’m the property of the United States of America to do with as it wills.
The ancient Egyptian priests had advanced their study of the movements of the universe to the extent that by geometry they knew our planet was a sphere. They knew its circumference. They knew our planet circles the sun in 365.2 days. And they kept all they knew secret. The same as now, the people didn’t need to know what they knew.
Pythagoras, a Greek, studied under Egyptian priests, and vowed to keep what he knew secret. We don’t know much of what Pythagoras knew, but he is said to be the father of modern day mathematics. From geometry, Pythagoras claimed that figures represent the aspects of matter, numbers the characteristics of people and future events that take place. Quantum physicists, who study the microcosmic universe, are now finding the connection of things and people. They are beginning to understand the basic structure of the universe, beginning with the microcosmic. Coincidentally, the ancient sages of India held that so is the microcosmic so is the macrocosmic.
For thousands of years, the world’s powerful have kept the masses in dark, to leave most people pawns of the powerful. Born for justice; that is, right not the arbitrary construction of opinion, but an institution of nature, I never acquiesced to New Deal law. I studied my Constitution, determined that I enjoyed God-given rights, had a bigger than life calling, and cut from the herd. Regardless of the Supreme Court’s dismissing this pipsqueak without a word, when everything should have gone wrong, according to what I’d been taught, everything went right. Strangely, after I went on my own, my life kept getting better and better, in fact miracles occurred. Today all of my dreams have come true. I count my blessings every day. By acting on my belief—that’s the key—I know the power that lies within us. My source of law comes to me from within.
The universe cannot out of man’s convenience be compartmentalized. There is only one fundamental law, the background of the U. S. Constitution, which the U.S. Supreme Court has consistently ignored.
It’s popular to accept the supernatural and government malarkey. It allows compartmentalization, to conveniently take God’s law and man’s law out of context, actually, both from the same source. Taking the law out of context allows man to invent the law, for instance, to take the taxpayer to the cleaners in order to give to others for the vote, or for instance, to invent the means of making us all sinners, and for a price to be forgiven. You can be a Bible thumper, or a hippie. In principle, it’s all the same.
Interestingly, in my dictionary, there is a definition of anarchy the leftist revolutionary hippies in the Obama camp, including Pelosi and Reid, don’t know, “a theory that regards the absence of all direct or coercive government as a political ideal and that proposes the cooperative and voluntary association of individuals and groups as the principal mode of organized society.” After seeing Pelosi and the Democrats walking through a Tea Party gathering at the Capital, laughing mockingly at them, I can just imagine the laughter I’d receive from the powers that be to hear me carrying on.
Coincidentally, we are entering the Age of Aquarius, the sign of which is brotherhood and fraternity, which dovetails with the above mentioned theory on anarchy. It also explains the Age of Pisces, the age we’re departing, whose sign is two attached fish swimming in opposite directions.
Interestingly, distinguished philosopher and cultural historian Richard Tarnas, after a 30 year study of the alignments of the planets Saturn and Pluto, found an astonishingly consistent correspondence between planetary alignments and the archetypal patterns of human history and biography, and even more interesting, in the month and year that Saturn and Pluto went into unfavorable alignment it was in the month and year that Obama was elected President; and moreover, that the unfavorable alignment will remain for his entire term of office, and just in time for the Mayan calendar prediction of the end of the world. Add to this scenerio the Age of Aquarius, a time for brotherhood and fraternity.
Here’s a quote from Tarnas’ Cosmos and Psyche, copywrited in 2006, the first printing in May 2007, under “Cycles of Crisis and Contraction,” above referenced, when Saturn and Pluto went into unfavorable alignment, “An atmosphere of gravity and tension . . .a widespread sense of epochal closure: the end of an era . . .the destruction of an earlier mode of life that in retrospect may seem to have been marked by widespread indulgence, decadence, naiveté, denial, and inflation,” what do you know, the hippie movement. The sign of two attached fish swimming in opposite directions, the transformation Obama speaks of, “through contraction, conservative reaction, crisis and termination,” thanks to the hippie movement, Tarnas’ prophecy has the appearance of becoming the reality.
By chance, when I was born, Saturn was trine Pluto. By chance, I was born with Aquarius on the rise. With Saturn trine Pluto, Astrologer’s Handbook says I would have understanding of the subtle workings of the universe and work in the fields of the occult and physics. With Aquarius on the rise, I would be for brotherhood and fraternity.
When I departed my old life, coincidentally, I met an astrologer and had him create my astrological chart. I was not impressed. It didn’t fit. Like most folks, I didn’t hold much value in astrology. When I departed, I was the pioneer seeking to find a new identity. As time went on, I began to fit with my astrological chart. There are coincidences too numerous to leave any doubt in my mind that the movements of the heavens correspond with human history. There is no doubt in my mind that each of us has a path of destiny. I’ve been off of it and on it. When I’m off, if anything can go wrong it does. When I’m on, no matter what, everything comes out right in the end. Both America and I were born under the sign of Aquarius. Can any man change what is to be?
Which will it be, termination and one-world godless government, or termination and a theory that regards the absence of all direct or coercive government as a political ideal and that proposes the cooperative and voluntary association of individuals and groups as the principal mode of organized society? It could go either way, Obama’s way or my way.
Joseph Whitworth Smith
Comments