>> Subject: Selling Post Office Buildings
> FEINSTEINS WIN U.S.P.S. SALES
> The US has entered into a contract with a real estate firm to sell 56
> buildings that currently house U.S. Post Offices. All 56 were built,
> operated, and paid for by tax-paying American citizens. Now enjoy
> reading the rest:
> The government has decided it no longer needs these buildings, most of
> which are located on prime land in towns and cities across the country.
> The sale of these properties will fetch about $19 billion!
> A regular real estate commission will be paid to the company that was
> given the exclusive listing for handling the sales. That company is CRI
> and it belongs to a man named Richard Blum.
> Richard Blum is the husband of Senator Dianne Feinstein!
> Most voters and many of the government people who approved the deal
> have not made the connection between the two because they have
> different last names.
> Senator Feinstein and her husband stand to make a fortune, estimated at
> between $950 million and $1.1 billion!! from these transactions.
> His company is the sole real estate agent on the sale!
> CRI will be making a minimum of 2% and as much as 6% commission on each
> and every sale. All of the properties that are being sold are all fully
> paid for. They were purchased with U.S. taxpayers dollars.
> The U.S.P.S. is allowed free and clear, tax exempt use. The only cost
> to keep them open is the cost to actually keep the doors open and the
> heat and lights on. The United States Postal Service doesn't even have
> to pay county property taxes on these subject properties. QUESTION?
> Would you put your house in foreclosure just because you couldn't
> afford to pay the electric bill?
> Well, the folks in Washington have given the Post Office the OK to do
> it! Worse yet, most of the net proceeds of the sales will go back to
> the U.S.P.S, an organization that is so poorly managed that they have
> lost $117 billion dollars in the past 10 years!
> No one in the mainstream media is even raising an eyebrow over the
> conflict of interest and on the possibility of corruption on the sale
> of billions of dollars worth of public assets.
> How does a U.S. Senator from San Francisco manage to get away
> with organizing and lobbying such a sweet deal? Has our government
> become so elitist that they have no fear of oversight?
> It's no mere coincidence that these two public service crooks have
> different last names; a feeble attempt at avoiding transparency in
> these type of transactions.
> Pass this info on before it's pulled from the Internet. You can verify
> it on Snopes and TruthorFiction:
> If this doesn't upset you, don't complain about the corruption and the ineptness in D.C.