FT Hood Troops deploying to Syria

by Dan Bubalo 

pso2.gif

I have been able to verify something extremely troubling in the past 12 hours.  A close and verifiable source contacted me to lament the deployment of a friend from Ft. Hood to Egypt, where this particular soldier will be for the next nine months.  We have no military base in Egypt, so we’re all trying to understand the assignment and wonder if he and the other 400 soldiers are living in a tent in the desert, and if they are, how do they receive supplies, from everything to food, water, ammunition, and fuel to conduct whatever mission they are to fulfill, for I cannot imagine a C-140 being allowed to land at Cairo International.

The following information has been sourced thoroughly.  This particular soldier said that while he was not really thrilled about the assignment to Egypt, it was better than the soldiers that remained at the military base BECAUSE THEY HAD JUST RECEIVED THEIR DEPLOYMENT ORDERS TO GO TO SYRIA.  That certainly contradicts the posturing and false reassurances and table-pounding of Obama and Kerry, does it not?

Of course, credibility should never enter the discussion when talking about this president.  If frogs get nourishment from eating flies, this pathologically dysfunctional misfit gets his lifeblood from telling lies.  It is the manner in which he is genetically coded and been brainwashed to operate.

read more: 

Ft Hood headed to Syria

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comments

  • Historian... stranger things have happened. The scenario you present may not be so far fetched when we think of the bold and brazen things this President has already accomplished with little or no opposition from Congress or the people.

    History certainly has a way of repeating itself... and there is no new thing under the sun.  The President has in my opinion been consolidating his hold on the government... purging the military and other agencies of those not loyal or manageable to his purpose.  I have warned of this since his first election... and with each passing month the evidence of tyranny mounts up and Congress seems oblivious to it. 

    Perhaps, Congress believes they can use Obama for their own purposes, thinking they can control him.  Whatever, their motives Congress is not innocent or ignorant of what is about to transpire... making it all the more serious and urgent that the people both prepare for what is to come as they attempt to avert it.

  • 400 , with more to follow. My question in regards to the initial deployment, what is the makeup by MOS? Are we seeing MI, STRATCOM, Air Defense in the initial deployment?. This reminds me of the 1979 hostage rescue. My Active Army Reserve MI detachment was one of 2 identified to deploy with the RDF. At that time, the RDF had no organic MI  assets, and the CONOP was to activate  a Strategic Reserve MI unit to accompany the RDF deployment.

    Now, for the intent; is Obama upping the ante that if American forces are attacked in Egypt? Would this justifies a full up military deployment from Ft. Hood? It appears Obama is baiting the trap to escalate the Arab Spring issue.

  • Please allow me to throw this out for thought. There is no proof that this is happening, but we do have historical precedents.  Lucius Cornelius Sulla 138 BC to 78 BC was a talented general and dictator of Rome. he had been victorious in the Numidian wars, the Cimbri wars,and the Mithrdatic wars. twice he marched on Rome. He attempted to replace the ruling Patrician class with plebeians loyal to himself, and in some cases he attempted to replace Patricians with slaves.

    After Sulla the army was no longer to be anywhere near Rome. The republic was falling apart by 60 BC. Julius Caesar 100 BC to 44 BC claimed to have seen the situation in Rome as deteriorated to the point that he himself took action. On  I  January of 49 BC Caesar crossed the Rubicon and scattered the Roman senate whom he soon recalled with the intention of implementing reforms but also of having himself declared emperor.

    In our day we see a decay of  government that threatens not only the Republic, but the very fabric of the nation itself.  Like Sulla, we see Federal bureaucrats displacing the American people with aliens who not only are in no way American, but are often hostile toward the real Americans who are the American nation.

    Mr. Obama has worked tirelessly to fundamentally change America. And as time progresses we began to see that the fundamental change is from a constitutional  Republic to a Marxist globalist communitarian establishment that is totally unacceptable to the real Americans.

    Could it be that like the Roman Senate which feared the presence of the army, that Mr. Obama and his left wing cronies in the establishment also fear the army?  I think that Mr. Obama has already learned that the military is not squarely in his corner. Could it be that in desperation he has initiated a purge to rid the military of a high command of professional soldiers dedicated to America, the American people, and the American Constitution in order to replace them with political generals loyal to himself ? Could it be that his social programs which he has implemented in our military are designed to create a new Soviet style Army ?  He knows that if he were to declare martial law and attack the American people, that he might have to rely solely on his national security gunmen. Could it be true that perpetual war precedes a national fall ? Why is there perpetual war ? Could it be that key military units are being mobilized especially at Fort Hood because the dictatorial Mr. Obama fears having them close to Texas ?  Could it be that he also fears that the Army might support the people ? Could it be that Mr. Obama wants these key elements out of the country and is tailor making a new war specially designed to remove military forces that he fears safely to Syria where he no longer has to fear them?

  • Oren... I saw the same testimony by Gen. Dempsey and it appeared to me that he was very uncomfortable with the situation.  His testimony was brief, limited, and carefully guarded. He understands that he could be the next General to retire if he steps out of line with the Obama Administration.  It appears that this Administration has purged many of the bold flag officers from the ranks of the military and those remaining are very guarded... for fear of what may happen if they speak out. 

    Congress has a duty in this situation to support their military officers... and that has not occurred.  In fact putting Gen Dempsey on the spot in a public hearing was wrong and they should have known what his response would be before asking him to OUT THE PRESIDENT... as that is what they wanted him to do.  If Dempsey responded fully to Congress's inquiry about what he wanted from Congress he may well have been on his way to retirement. 

    In stead Congress should have asked Dempsey specific questions... regarding the legal limits on the use of force as he understood them?  That should have triggered a direct response as to the Constitutional authority to wage war and the effects of the war powers and national security act.  Congress could have then told Dempsey directly that the President could not unilaterally engage in acts of war without congressional approval.  In stead they wanted Dempsey to carry their water on that issue and he was not about to bite on that topic.

    In all fairness to the military... Congress has left its General officers swinging in the air. It is clear that Congress has not come to the aid of those Generals who have resisted this Administration on several occasions... Benghazi being just one incident.  Until Congress steps up to the plate and demonstrates it is willing to protect the ranks, the military will be very reluctant to stick their necks out.  Congress is putting them in a very bad place, because CONGRESS is unwilling to act and the Generals know it.

  • Sending our troops out all over the world.  Who we going to have here in our bases to protect the homeland?  Russians or Chinese troops?

  • Never listen to what politicians say but watch what they do!!!!!  If they say one thing they will most likely be doing the opposite.  No boots on the ground means that boots will be on the ground.  A pin prick bombing mission means that is will be a very large mission.  I remember when they said that they were not interested in nation building and that is exactly what they tried to do.  Most of the time they are full of you know what.  But the fault is ours.  We voted for these deceivers.  When will we wake up and take the election process seriously and demand that honest, descent, upstanding people run for office instead of lying scoundrels.  In the final analysis it is our own fault because we elected them.

  • The American people need to stand up and demand this mans impeachment, before he kills anymore of our sons and daughters. He is a lyer and two faced....anyone with a brain can see he is out to destroy America from within. So much for his lies....no boots on the ground....he is a liar and a trader and needs to be removed from office...by the people and for the people. Stand up and demand impeachment.

     

  • I would not worry too much about where they will be getting their supplies since the U.S. military are in control of this situation.  They do know what they are doing as opposed to this dysfunctional administration.

  • Such a stupid, stupid move that can only happen when there is a commander in chump who values him self above all others and especially military troops. I guess he is sending troops to settle "work place violence".

  • and this Is Some Information to go along whit what i said earlier... 

    http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/09/12/sources-u-s-weapons...

This reply was deleted.