TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
SCOTUS Narrowly Upholds Constitution 
.
clown-Schumer Urges Trump to Wait
'til He's Majority Leader to Replace Kennedy
{ rickwells.us } ~ There’s no telling what Chuck clown-Schumer was thinking as he tried a more measured tone in his political rhetoric... a ridiculous attempt to shame and persuade President Trump to wait until after the midterm elections to appoint a replacement for retiring Supreme Court Justice Kennedy. It’s as if clown-Schumer is secretly aware that President Trump has chronic Stockholm syndrome and that he would welcome even more obstructionism than he’s facing at every turn in every form dummycrats-Democrats can throw at him. clown- Schumer argued that President Trump should wait until there might be more than the current 49 dummycrats- Democrat Senators, following the midterms and even perhaps, in his wildest nightmares, a Majority Leader clown-Schumer. Calling it the “most important Supreme Court vacancy for this country in at least a generation,” clown-Schumer illustrated, in the typical dummycrats- Democrat double-speak, that the liberal sky might well be falling. He said that “the fate of our healthcare system sealed when the dummycrats-Dems passed a bill nobody could read as a stealth wealth redistribution mechanism, reproductive rights for women infanticide on demand and countless other protections giveaways of other people’s stuff for middle class parasitic Americans are at stake.”...Like Trump is going to listen to clown-Schumer and when was the time clown-Schumer listen to Trump. https://rickwells.us/schumer-trump-wait-kennedy/ .
ICE Protesters Demand To Enter Agency Headquarters, Fail
by Julia Cohen.
Iran’s Islamist Gov’t Faces Collapse After
US Replaces liar-nObama Policy with Trump’s
by REBEKAH BAKER.
GRILLED: Strzok Questioned by Lawmakers
by Sara Carter
{ saraacarter.com } ~ House Judiciary and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee members grilled embattled, anti-Trump FBI agent Peter Strzok... behind closed doors on Capitol Hill Wednesday, as he attempted to explain his vehement bias against President Donald Trump, his senior role in the alleged Trump-Russia collusion investigation, and the exoneration of liar-Hillary Clinton for her use of a private server while she was Secretary of State. Strzok, who evaded a subpoena from House Judiciary Committee chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-VA), voluntarily appeared at the hearing. Thousands of Strzok’s anti-Trump text messages, which he exchanged with former FBI lawyer and his paramour, Lisa Page, sparked anger from Republicans and criticism from some dummycrats-Democrats who contend that senior members of the FBI utilized their power and political leanings to target Trump both before and after the 2016 election. Freedom Caucus & Judiciary Committee member, Matt Gaetz (R-FL) attended today’s deposition and reacted to Strzok’s testimony, telling the Sean Hannity Radio Show, “… I am shocked at the lack of curiosity with Robert Mueller. I mean Sean, if you were in Mueller’s shoes, and you had found these text messages, I would think that you would want to ask whether or not they impacted the investigative decisions that were made, whether there was bias, whether there was contact with other members of the FBI regarding the investigation and where it was going and who was making the critical judgment calls,” the Florida Congressman said. “I just cannot believe the lack of curiosity on the part of Robert Mueller. It was the strongest reaction I had today from Peter Strzok’s testimony.”....Chairman Goodlatte: “FBI Lawyers instructed
Peter Strzok not to answer many, many questions”
by sundanceSCOTUS Narrowly Upholds Constitution
by Thomas Gallatin: On Tuesday, the Supreme Court handed down two significant rulings that both upheld clear, constitutionally and statutorily defined powers and rights. On Wednesday, it issued a ruling on another First Amendment case. However, the disturbing fact was that all three decisions were determined by the narrowest of margins, the 5-4 split. This demonstrates just how fundamentally divided the highest court in the land is when it comes to viewing Rule of Law and the Constitution. And how important election results can be. In Trump v. Hawaii, the Court upheld President Donald Trump’s statutory authority under 8 U.S.C. §1182(f) to enforce his “travel ban” on immigrants from certain countries. That this explicitly delineated authority was even in question, and that it rose all the way up to the Supreme Court to enforce, speaks volumes as to the state of the nation’s judiciary. It was obvious that Trump had the statutory authority, irrespective of the merits of his decision. But judicial despots at every level insisted that they could divine Trump’s supposedly racist and anti-Muslim intent, ruling on that basis instead of what the law actually says.
Likewise, in NIFLA v. Becerra, the Court ruled in favor of free speech protections and against state-compelled speech by striking down California’s Reproductive FACT Act, which mandated that any women’s health clinic — including those dedicated to pro-life services — provide information on abortion services. Clearly, the law targeted pro-life organizations, compelling them to advise in favor of the very issue they exist to oppose. Justice Clarence Thomas noted that the Constitution recognizes no such dubious category of “professional speech” that supposedly “[gives] the States unfettered power to reduce a group’s First Amendment rights by simply imposing a licensing requirement.” And Justice Anthony Kennedy pointedly observed that the FACT Act was inherently discriminatory and “a paradigmatic example of the serious threat presented when government seeks to impose its own message in place of individual speech, thought, and expression.”
The third case likewise involved compelled speech — that of public employees subject to forced union dues, or “fair share” fees to support collective bargaining and other union activities. “This procedure violates the First Amendment and cannot continue,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the majority. “Neither an agency fee nor any other payment to the union may be deducted from a nonmember’s wages, nor may any other attempt be made to collect such a payment, unless the employee affirmatively consents to pay.” The ruling is a big loss for Big Labor.
Collectively, the most concerning aspect of these rulings is the Court’s 5-4 split. All three decisions would have gone the other way if Merrick Garland rather than Neil Gorsuch had been sitting on the bench. As for Kennedy, still no word on his rumored retirement, but now — with Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell still at the helm — would be a great time. ~The Patriot Post
https://patriotpost.us/articles/56814?mailing_id=3573&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.3573&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body
Comments
Bonnie
he knew he was not going to expose his masters no matter what. Rosenstein also knew he was not
strzok was never going to implicate himself. he knows what he did mueller does not care