Friday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

TheFrontPageCover
~ Featuring ~
Social Security Fails 
by John Stossel
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=
.
Mueller and the Media Represent the Ancien Régime
qNzcqktamX85OSGI52r6B_pdajZU0YnoYLBnPtZMw2e1tEh9K99ZPkp6ix_0WSJbnY8Wlx_jbF0FxyatiD4YzhQ4uS9SXri-oFiuYX7CklpScc1O62aP9fRRj2IWbAWjqZy8nQ2mIwwOdMaLkQe3eTzLyDmEEGtnCXZAQw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450by DAVID CATRON
{ spectator.org } ~ The Mueller probe, with its indictments of Trump associates for offenses unrelated to its ostensible mandate, combined with mendacious media coverage of President Trump... is an obvious attempt to restore the old order that the electorate rejected in 2016. It seeks to annul the will of the voters and return us to the incipient authoritarianism that germinated during the scumbag/liar-nObama era, and which the ruling class expected to blossom under liar-Clinton. The bureaucrats who support the restoration of Beltway despotism call themselves public servants, yet despise the public. The politicians who support it call themselves dummycrats-Democrats, yet despise democracy. The most important fact to absorb about all this is counterintuitive: The primary target isn’t really the President. Mueller and his apologists know Trump is the voice of a nationwide rebellion against their authority, and realize that the threat can’t be neutralized until he is silenced. The end game is to crush what they see as a peasant’s revolt. Mueller’s function is to provide a legal pretext for removing the President from office. The role of the media is to misrepresent everything he does in order to trick independent voters into giving the dummycrats-Democrats a majority in the House. This will prevent Trump from continuing to act on his 2016 mandate. The dummycrats-Democrats will  impeach the President if they gain a majority in the House, regardless of their chances of securing a conviction in the Senate. Impeachment will effectively shut down his Presidency either way. Fighting it would involve so much White House time that virtually nothing else would get done. And this is an important dummycrats-Democratic goal. Moreover, if Senate Republicans are as weak-kneed as they were in 1974, a conviction may not be necessary to get Trump out of the White House. If the dummycrats-Democrat-controlled House had impeached President Nixon in August of 1974, the dummycrats-Democrat-dominated Senate would not have been able to convict him without six Republican votes...  https://spectator.org/mueller-and-the-media-represent-the-ancien-regime/?utm_source=American+Spectator+Emails&utm_campaign=d94d056f55-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_08_23_08_41&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_797a38d487-d94d056f55-104608113
.
Graham: ‘Very Likely’ Trump Fires Sessions After Midterms
Qo_a1CZ1kUWs4_3vB_d4CEksNwsPc9gDOrRXRtiXYcrvTNdo7LB3G2RfFyto0gYtUEscxQjg2wfu9bCczvzboOLzZrEaQ5c_r9ho1HncmBTUW_edolb3UxVQyU4R-RdZUWwMK-A67VBk6so9zdSSS44uZO1TBBzaX2O6XwMQhPuehUNWlw5xV6g=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450by Saagar Enjeti
{ dailycaller.com } ~ Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina predicted that President Donald Trump will fire  Attorney General Jeff Sessions after the 2018 midterm elections... “The president’s entitled to an attorney general he has faith in, somebody that’s qualified for the job, and I think there will come a time, sooner rather than later, where it will be time to have a new face and a fresh voice at the Department of Justice,” Graham told Bloomberg News adding “clearly, Attorney General Sessions doesn’t have the confidence of the president.” Graham’s prediction comes after Trump attacked Sessions in a recent interview with Fox News. “I put in an attorney general that never took control of the Justice Department, Jeff Sessions,” the president said, adding “he took the job and then he said, ‘I’m going to recuse myself,'” the president said. “I said, ‘What kind of man is this?’ And by the way, he was on the campaign. The only reason I gave him the job, I felt loyalty. He was an original supporter.”
.
Just Another Word for Nothing Left to Lose
dfainCxz4eddT3QkmH4P7N1OrX2yW8_aYyhuCHuOo3fm_QNJR4Du-gOK6djf49pgLQ2UzYzxxKHqajQj8PKtNqtRD0H0JCHZdY4CplREcmnW7E3ufhnnFwVzsCib37CbtPANJ3nHfMxxFYsRPT2PjAknmvXgG4GvSXZAeoys84DktIJCTEPK_z7lWrA=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450by STEVEN GREENHUT
{ spectator.org } ~ At a conference examining California’s housing crisis, one of the more liberal audience members expressed her frustration at those of us who even talked about free markets... I don’t recall her exact words, but the mere mention of such ideas were a non-starter. Apparently, such notions shouldn’t be raised in polite company given what they mean for the poor and disenfranchised. Couldn’t we just get back to discussing government regulations and programs? That comment summarized the problem with discussing public policy in a state where such ideas are considered arcane. The notion that people should be free to pursue their own lives, with only minimal interference and subsidy from the government, is never on the table. The assumption, in the Legislature, among policymakers and in local government, is that private actors would leave a path of death and destruction if the government didn’t try to manage everything. That the government itself always leaves destruction in its wake — not only within its own bureaucracies but within the industries it controls — simply is more evidence that government needs even more power. We’re free to talk about tweaking current rules and regulations, but never to propose reducing or eliminating them. Government knows best, even when government employees are caught repeatedly enriching themselves at our expense. And, of course, there’s virtually no area of our lives — outside our sexual behavior and reproductive “choices” — that should be free from state interference. It should be no surprise, then, that the libertarian Cato Institute’s latest “Freedom in the 50 States” report finds California nearly at the bottom, in 48th place. New York and Hawaii were worse, but California has been remarkably consistent in its ranking over the past 16 years...
.
Trump: I may have to force
Justice Department to turn over documents
9Sb1UW64C8SJiEOvgcd8_ipD_ELLZrGXs3CinnIQbVEmutx9YBgrXpvYq4T9VmQ1GHVOxzVYVCQFrtISOSkH0DeLkAia4TDejCOrevKMDI1-SsORczyiJyshCKHcoKxmQRBhGAfn1ImyWvqnMvS773LHINlfooknbxG4e706fml5XeR2psEs6zrqYStcRjWGCdXJYtci0ZZ3_8ilBc0j5eqxwpycAnVT3-637n4kgpJ0lDOf7AEdqUIBDXf6T6pD4bSWJaYXpaUAcxthIfBPV6VUc3KVSHJPJn4kOeX0HbFXb7qrljqX5jTehYARRZbG2WQB-tgiqMBaT5BEdYaUxg=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450by Pete Kasperowicz
{ washingtonexaminer.com } ~ President Trump is threatening to force his Justice Department to hand over documents Republicans have sought for months about its investigation into his campaign... Trump has said for months that he didn't want to get involved. But in a Fox News interview that aired Thursday, he said he may have to step in. "At the right time, I think I'm going to have to do the documents," he said when asked if he would use his power to force the department to act. "I didn't want to, but I think I'm going to have to. There's such corruption," he added. Republicans have been pressing the Justice Department for documents that detail the decisions it made about investigations into Trump's campaign, as well as liar-Hillary Clinton's private email server...  https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/trump-i-may-have-to-get-involved-with-justice-department-documents?utm_source=WEX_News%20Brief_08/23/2018&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=WEX_News%20Brief
Libs Use Cohen to Push Guilt by Association,
But Forget 5 scumbag/liar-nObama Pals Who Were 10x Worse
XCrpmfjlz_DHt6VCEnlc5MYpoOLH6oHjt_iDlIQXdaNUIiIq_3CKbYHxBnYGHL9dnPy9etaLxf0lVzKRnsETCVNwh78BvpNfEOz9Iwr0VAAK3l1uOX-6FGbeibyihdBDX4uXTwxR7jIs-QH6GsTSZIyxoSaaAuQd5dEq=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450by LISA PAYNE-NAEGER
{ westernjournal.com } ~ It didn’t take long for liberal spin to conjure up the specter of guilt by association as the media  tried to build a case for impeachment of President Donald Trump... due to the latest developments in the Michael Cohen and Paul Manafort cases. A lot of nonsense takes place on social media, but sometimes bits of wisdom shine through. These particular comments put the spotlight on liberal hypocrisy that has no problem with smearing Trump with guilt by association, but was mysteriously blind when it came to former President Barack scumbag/liar-nObama. Liberal memories are short when it comes to liberal sins, but author and conservative Twitter user Thomas Wictor reminds us all that guilt by association was — or should have been — a much bigger issue in the  scumbag/liar-Obama administration... Tony Rezko,  Courtney Dupree,  Willie Shepherd,  Rod Blagojevich,  Bill Ayers and there are more.
.
AGHnzvDgAIc_dkrUO59jF21LrUmiQ79dA3RIshU-YlAdfSFPOhc54BmJs1OTRtvnrEX-cCbeiMVXdurlydL03p7YzXsWg_6cAavWTIOYU1PogQU4ftAjtXM=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=

. 

Social Security Fails 
MjjRYUxiwQ-0HymoKhKBMwHZpKZybNkKJS_Qi3kQcV9FP7mX8MKMNN3A9iH9-cTRTBQ8aMxWEwqrqXSzs5vytg-Vsgb_Hj_qEtmX4pJyBZubMcZQ5OZeCU0_BI6nEcT1kYpBsx-QIiipUPu2CXyKn1WQ=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?width=450
by John Stossel

{ townhall.com } ~ Social Security is running out of money.

You may not believe that, but it's a fact.

That FICA money taken from your paycheck was not saved for you in a "trust fund." Politicians misled us. They spent every penny the moment it came in.

This started as soon as they created Social Security. They assumed that FICA payments from young workers would cover the cost of sending checks to older people. After all, at the time, most Americans died before they reached 65.

Now, however, people keep living longer. There just aren't enough young people to cover my Social Security checks.

So Social Security is going broke. This year, the program went into the red for the first time.

Presidents routinely promise to fix this problem.

George W. Bush said he'd "strengthen and save" Social Security. Barack scumbag/liar-nObama said he'd "safeguard" it, and Donald Trump said that he'll "save" it.

But none has done anything to save it.

"There is a plan out there to save it, but it requires some tough choices," says Heritage Foundation budget analyst Romina Boccia.

Heritage proposes cutting payments to rich people and raising the retirement age to 70.

Good luck with that. Seniors vote. Most vote against politicians who suggest cutting benefits.

This summer, interviewing people for my new video about Social Security's coming bankruptcy, was the first time I had heard the majority of such a group say they were aware there is a problem. One said, "We're already at a trillion dollars deficit ... It's almost like a big Ponzi scheme."

Actually, more like a pyramid scheme. Ponzi schemes secretly take your money. But the Social Security trick is written into the law -- there for anyone who bothers to look.

Social Security isn't the only hard choice ahead of us. Medicare will run out of money in just eight years. At that point, benefits will automatically be cut. Social Security hits its wall in 15 years.

Amazingly, as we approach this disaster, dummycrats-Democrats say -- spend even more.

Sen. Elizabeth dinky-Warren, D-Mass., proudly announced, "Nearly every dummycrats-Democrat in the United States Senate has voted in favor of expanding Social Security."

How would they pay for it? "Raise taxes on the wealthy!" is the usual answer.

I tried that on Boccia: "Just raise taxes on the rich!"

"There isn't enough money, even that the rich would have," she countered, "to pay for the $200 trillion in unfunded liabilities."

One partial solution proposed by Heritage and others is to let younger workers put some of their Social Security money into their own personal retirement accounts.

"Imagine being able to own and control your own retirement dollars," urged Boccia, with genuine excitement. "You could invest it in businesses, grow the economy, whatever rocks your boat."

If history is any guide, private accounts would almost certainly pay retirees more than Social Security will ever pay.

"Even a conservative portfolio of stocks and bonds that got you about a 5 percent annual return, you would make many times more," said Boccia.

She's right. Money in government hands just sits there or gets spent wastefully; it's rarely invested wisely.

Private accounts have been tried in a few countries. In Chile, the investment they created helped make Chile the richest country in Latin America. Before, Chile was poorer than most.

Yet even after that success, leftists in South America hold street protests against private accounts. They're angry because capitalists get a slice of the pie.

I told Boccia that I couldn't understand why people in Chile don't loudly cheer private accounts because of the wealth they'd created.

"We lack gratitude," she replied, "for what the free market provides. That is difficult to wrap your head around. It's easy to think, 'Here is the government. This is where I go.'"

But eventually, even governments run out of other people's money.

Like most American politicians, Donald Trump campaigned saying, "I'm not going to cut Social Security ... not going to cut Medicare."

He and other politicians pretend they're protecting people's futures, but they are not. They're ignoring the inevitable.

Better to fix old-age programs now -- rather than have them suddenly go bankrupt later.
https://{/columnists/johnstossel/2018/08/15/social-security-fails-n2509758?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&newsletterad=
 
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center

Comments

  • yes we need to get the word out to vote for republicans.

  • YEP U LAID OUT THE MUELLER PLAN I COULD NOT HAVE DONE IT BETTER

    IT IS TO SILENCE US AND GOD HELP US IF WE LOOSE.   BECOME COMPLACENT OR 

    WORSE IF THEY ACTUALLY GAIN CONTROL OF THE HOUSE THAT MEANS VOTE AND 

    VOTE WE MUST

This reply was deleted.