Friday AM ~ TheFrontPageCover

~ Featuring ~
Senate Dems Kill Newborn
and Preborn Protections
Thomas Gallatin  
Democrats Are Lying to the Public 
About Coronavirus Readiness
{ } ~ An Associated Press fact check confirms what Breitbart News reported earlier this week: that Democrat presidential candidates are falsely claiming that President Donald Trump cut funding and personnel needed to fight coronavirus... On Tuesday, Breitbart News fact-checked “mostly false” claims by former New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg during the Democrat debate in South Carolina. Bloomberg claimed that Trump had “fired” a pandemic specialist at the White House, and “defunded” the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). The implication: Trump was to blame for the spread of coronavirus — even though there have been just over a dozen cases and no fatalities in the U.S. The truth: the pandemic specialist had left voluntarily during a reorganization of the bloated National Security Council (NSC), and the CDC cuts — as the agency wound down its Ebola response — were only proposed, not enacted. The AP confirmed Thursday, in an article titled “AP FACT CHECK: Democrats distort coronavirus readiness,” that much of what Democrats are saying about Trump’s response to the coronavirus challenge is simply not true: Democratic presidential contenders are describing the federal infectious-disease bureaucracy as rudderless and ill-prepared for the coronavirus threat because of budget cuts and ham-handed leadership by President Donald Trump. That’s a distorted picture. For starters, Trump hasn’t succeeded in cutting the budget. He’s proposed cuts but Congress ignored him and increased financing instead. The National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention aren’t suffering from budget cuts that never took effect. Some public health experts say a bigger concern than White House budgets is the steady erosion of a CDC grant program for state and local public health emergency preparedness — the front lines in detecting and battling new disease. But that decline was set in motion by a congressional budget measure that predates Trump. “The CDC’s response has been excellent, as it has been in the past,” said John Auerbach, president of the nonpartisan Trust for America’s Health, which works with government at all levels to improve the nation’s response to high-risk health crises. Some Democrats have charged that Trump decimated the nation’s public health leadership, but Auerbach said CDC’s top scientific ranks have remained stable during the past three years...
Read the full AP fact check here.  
One of the Biggest Dangers to the Free World
Dwc3PbuKyOc6Z9JjJfsCwXF6jjCNbd4XD1ZylGrK8fDzlwAPQt-ztr4gmouaRs9XPFM21q5syeBP1pZ7uh85PJF6hjYbm01ymL2vtgfznpuuKQC-XXpZS2UaNxMB671aOmvsF6W0CLqlZrSjjElC6a70BMqaEVVg-XPINX-eV2T4rmuZsO_tXVRPxNluBw=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby Dr. Shmuel Katz
{ } ~ In the age of misinformation, disinformation and outright lies, too many people are oblivious to the reality that surrounds them... In many cases, the fact that their personal well-being, may be negatively affected by the on-going trends, did not trigger their conscious perception of reality. Wishful thinking was for a long time a serious motivation to make irrational decisions. The classical example was the “Peace for our times” Chamberlain's interpretation of Hitler’s letter promising peace and tranquility in Europe before the Second World War. Another delusional action was related to the infamous “Iran Deal” which looked promising on paper but very rapidly, it became evident that there were many problems with the deal which gave the radical Iranian leadership a clear pass to possess atomic weapons after several years. During this period of time, they could cheat the observers, continue producing nuclear material, improve on their delivery systems, expand their efforts to destabilize their target countries and establish a terror infrastructure that will support their long-term goals of international domination. Interestingly, in the near future, elections for national leadership are looming in Israel and in the USA. In both countries important decisions will have to be made, which will determine the future of both countries. For some reason people like to make the differences between the two major opposing parties as a quarrel between Left and Right. In reality the decision relates to choices which will have significant effects on national security and on economic stability. People must understand that there is no real “free” government awarded “free stuff”! There is always somebody who will have to pay for it. Margaret Thatcher used to say that “The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money!” Look what happened in Cuba, Venezuela, or Russia. A similar consideration should be given when we have to address safety and security. Having neighbors who are determined to eliminate you from the face of the world and who educate their children to do the same, will never provide you with safety nor with security even if you will provide them with a flourishing economy and with enhanced political recognition. Providing these powers to terror entities will only make them a better financed and a more effective terrorist. Once they establish their distorted ideology throughout their educational systems and their public domains, they will not care about losing their economical achievement as their priorities will be to advance their wicked ideology. Osama Bin Laden, Mahmoud Abbas or the Supreme leaders of Iran, were and are wealthy people who were and are willing to risk everything in order to try and save their hold on power or to promote their distorted ideology. The well-being of their people was never a factor in their decision-making processes. In these days the state of Israel is facing two major events which may have significant historical consequences. The newly proposed Trump peace plan and the third attempt to go for elections in Israel in order to create a stable Israeli government. It seems that both events are somewhat interdependent...   

California Governor scumbag-Gavin
Newsom Says State Is Monitoring
8,400 Coronavirus Cases
Mmw6A32yFCfl5iV0x55lSRYKyDxt-zHefWe0QyW1fJESTC5_l-U9Bq1Nedk2fHH326Bt0u2dwgKrAeCpYq2co7B8ivBn5tk7ZLp_r13xFRh_pZFWei82nmbGDLZyFm-8r4BPwWJO1soUm426O94mlxUhXZcL5e4yT_nv-lkHtFqbW5vnTk4QNgH8j9KVx5df9yhTqJoX1LX2Y7qxtK4yNDWcfS54BnB9aUwQRwvzEaPxxtiF6w=s0-d-e1-ft#%3Ca%20rel%3Dnofollow%20href=?profile=RESIZE_710xby MARLO SAFI
{ } ~ Democratic California Governor scumbag-Gavin Newsom said Thursday the state is monitoring at least 8,400 people for Coronavirus... CNBC reported. “This is a fluid situation right now and I want to emphasize the risk to the American public remains low,” said Dr. Sonia Y. Angell, California Department of Public Health Director and State Health Officer during a press conference according to CNBC. “There have been a limited number of confirmed cases to date.” The announcement comes a day after a suspected case was reported to have been caused through “community spread,” making the person the first in the U.S. to contract the virus without having traveled to affected areas or having exposure to others who had the coronavirus, according to NPR. The suspected case was left undiagnosed for days because a request for testing wasn’t initially granted, officials at UC Davis Medical Center in Sacramento said according to NPR. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention warned Americans on Tuesday to prepare for the “expectation that this might be bad,” as the coronavirus continues to spread worldwide, with Italy emerging as the focal point of the virus in Europe, while Iran scrambles to combat the spread as confirmed cases in the country grow. Former Homeland Security adviser Fran Townsend told CBS “What people haven’t talked about is people can be totally asymptomatic… you can be infected with the coronavirus and have no symptoms and that means you can infect others and not even know you have it.”
GOP to force House vote 
on commie-Sanders' communism remarks
By Art Moore
{ } ~ House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy is preparing a procedural vote that condemns Democratic presidential candidate commie-Bernie Sanders' praise of purported accomplishments by communist regimes... Majority House Democrats will be faced with three choices, reports LifeZette, "Kill it in the cradle, vote against it thus apologizing for communism, or vote for it and trash their front-runner." "Do they stand with commie-Bernie or do they stand for freedom?" McCarthy asked. Democratic Rep. Tom Malinowski of New Jersey already has weighed in on the side of freedom. "Stalin doubled literacy in the Soviet Union, even as he murdered tens of millions of people," the congressman tweeted. "Apologists for dictatorship — Cuba, Russia, Saudi Arabia — always say 'they do some bad things, and some good things.' "It's a way of making them seem just like us. It's utterly wrong," Malinowski said. LifeZette noted that polls find that solid majorities across the political spectrum in the United States won't vote for a socialist for president. Nevertheless, House Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., told a reporter Wednesday she would accept commie-Sanders as the 2020 Democratic nominee despite saying last year her party did not support socialism. At a CNN town hall in South Carolina on Monday night, commie-Sanders doubled down on his praise for the late Cuban communist dictator Fidel Castro's "literacy program." "There was a lot of folks in Cuba at that point who were illiterate. And he formed a literacy brigade — you may read that — he went out and they helped people learn to read and write. You know what? I think teaching people to read and write is a good thing," he said. Four former Cuban political prisoners pointed out in a letter to Democratic National Chairman Tom Perez this week that Cuba had high literacy rates and was the region's wealthiest country before the 1959 Cuban Revolution. What Castro imposed, they said, was a "political indoctrination program" that remains at the core of the educational system. Along with the economic collapse under Castro, they noted, the people suffered the mass murder of thousands of dissidents, imprisonment in gulags and the loss of freedom of expression... 
Barack scumbag/liar-nObama Demands 
South Carolina TV Stations Pull 
Anti-loose lips liar-Biden Ads
By Rusty Weiss 
{ } ~ Former President Barack scumbag/liar-nObama sent a cease and desist letter to South Carolina television stations over an anti-loose lips liar-Biden ad he says is misleading... The ad, created by the pro-Trump super PAC, Committee to Defend the President, makes use of audio clips and quotes from scumbag/liar-nObama’s famous memoir, ‘Dreams from My Father.’ The clips are interspersed with textual criticisms of loose lips liar-Biden’s record. Using old or unrelated quotes to make an updated point is a tactic in political ads as old as time itself. scumbag/liar-nObama, however, is crying foul in this case. The quotes, an scumbag/liar-nObama spokeswoman suggests, are used in a “misleading way.”Let’s take a look at scumbag/liar-nObama’s argument. “This despicable ad is straight out of the Republican disinformation playbook, and it’s clearly designed to suppress turnout among minority voters in South Carolina by taking President scumbag/liar-nObama’s voice out of context and twisting his words to mislead viewers,” an scumbag/liar-nObama spokeswoman said in a statement. Of course, of course. The ad is racist. Who saw that one coming? “In the interest of truth in advertising, we are calling on TV stations to take this ad down and stop playing into the hands of bad actors who seek to sow division and confusion among the electorate,” she concluded. ‘Bad actors seeking to sow division’ essentially sums up scumbag/liar-nObama’s entire two terms in office. And if we were honestly interested in truth in advertising there would be zero political ads played on television stations. Ever...
UNHINGED: Five States Declaring 
Separation For This Insane Reasoning
by Sandy
{ } ~ Americans are becoming even more unhinged with every Election that takes place. It has reached such a boiling point in our nation that many states and its people want to separate themselves from being a united nation... This is so sad that things have escalated so far to this point. Our ancestors worked so hard and died for us to be united and work in ‘peace’ together. The Reds and Blues have completely disoriented people where they just want separation because of political views. Separation fever is sweeping the nation as quixotic but tenacious bands of frustrated rural dwellers, suburbanites and conservatives seek to break free from states with legislatures increasingly controlled by liberal big cities and metropolitan strongholds. “Oregon is controlled by the northwest portion of the state, Portland to Eugene. That’s urban land, and their decisions are not really representing rural Oregon.” “They have their agenda and they’re moving forward with it, and they’re not listening to us.” Mike McCarter, president of Move Oregon’s Border for a Greater Idaho stated. In Virginia, the newly elected Democratic majority’s progressive legislation on issues such as gun rights has spurred “Vexit,” or “Virginia exit,” a campaign to merge right-tilting rural counties into neighboring West Virginia that organizers say has the potential to catch fire nationwide. “To be honest, if this works — you’ve got a lot of red areas in this country that are totally dominated by a blue metropolis.” “If it works in Virginia, there’s no reason it can’t reshape the political map.” Vexit2020 leader Rick Boyer claims. States not mentioned above are trying to follow suit. New York and California are a few. California has been trying for years to divide itself for years to create the 51st state to no avail. The alarming thing about all this is that “rights” at which created the first civil war has nothing to really deal with this separation. It is more about political beliefs than anything else.
Senate Dems Kill Newborn and Preborn Protections
Thomas Gallatin  Senate Republicans failed on Tuesday to garner the 60 votes necessary to override a Democrat filibuster of two separate pieces of legislation, both of which sought to protect the most vulnerable among us — preborn and newborn children.

In a vote of 53 for and 44 against, the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act failed to advance to debate. The bill would have made abortion illegal after 20 weeks of pregnancy, except in cases risking the mother’s life and for victims of rape and incest (roughly 1% of pregnancies). Bill sponsor Lindsey Graham (R-SC) pointedly noted, “There are only seven countries that allow wholesale abortions at the 20-week period, including China and North Korea. The United States should NOT be in that club.”

The second Senate bill torpedoed by Democrats was the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, which would have required an abortion provider to engage in life-saving procedures to “preserve the life and health” of a child born alive after a failed abortive attempt. Ben Sasse (R-NE), a sponsor of the legislation, blasted Democrat resistance. “Nothing in this bill touches abortion access,” Sasse said, adding that it only protects “babies that have already been born.” After only three Democrats crossed the aisle to side with Republicans on the bill, Sasse disgustedly observed, “This body ought to be able to stand 100 to zero against that [infanticide] barbarism.” The three Democrats were Bob Casey (PA), Doug Jones (AL), and Joe Manchin (WV).

Hawaii Democrat Mazie Hirono voted against Sasse’s bill, arguing earlier this month that infanticide was already illegal and that the bill was “a solution to a problem that does not exist.” Yes, “infanticide is indeed illegal in the U.S.” Sasse agreed, “Yet in half of the states, there is no criminalization of walking away from the baby and allowing it to die by exposure. There’s an active-passive distinction and a state-federal distinction, which are both pretty fundamental.”

Predictably, CNN sought to defend Senate Democrats by ridiculously asserting that a “fetus that was born” was not the same as a “newborn baby,” because in the first instance the mother didn’t want the child. In other words, CNN ludicrously claims that a mother’s subjective personal desire rather than objective biological reality is what confers personhood onto a baby. With views this devoid of basic logic, is it any wonder the Left also rejects the biological reality of gender being binary?

On a final note, this all went down in the Senate as three Democrat senators hoping to be president were preparing to debate in South Carolina. None voted on the measures, but it was still exceedingly ironic for Elizabeth dinky/liar-Warren to, after repeating her “fired while pregnant” tall tale, slam Michael Bloomberg for allegedly telling a pregnant female employee to “kill it.” Isn’t “kill it” essentially the Democrat platform?   

~The Patriot Post  

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center