Washington Post calls for Islamic restrictions on internet free speech

Pamela Geller

on May 8, 2014
Screen Shot 2014-05-08 at 2.26.13 AM

The Washington Post is arguing for sharia restrictions on free speech in a wildly dishonest, silly, and illogical article that ran in yesterday’s WaPo Religion section, entitled “Internet hate speech can lead to acts of violence,”

Omar Sacirbey promotes the mythical “anti-Muslim hate” narrative that is skillfully used by sharia advocates to silence the truth about Islam. According to Sacirbey, free speech is a dangerous thing. Sacirbey wants internet speech to be restricted, because if free speech goes unchecked, it could lead to ______ (fill in the blank — make it up as you go along). He cites a “report” from the “Muslim Advocates” that claims that “anti-Muslim hate speech on the Internet is commonplace and can motivate some people to commit acts of violence against Muslims.” Operative word: “can.”

“Can” or “could” is just plain hogwash. What is real is the hate speech in the quran. What is real is the massive slaughter, oppression and subjugation of non-Muslims and secular Muslims, as commanded in under Islamic law. What is real are the 250-plus young Christian girls who were recently kidnapped and sold into sex slavery in Nigeria. What is real is the leader of the devout Muslim group responsible for that abomination, who said he acted “by allah.” What is real is 9/11, 7/7, 3/11 and the other 23,000 deadly Islamic attacks, each one committed by devout Muslims quoting chapter and verse of the quran. That is real hate speech.

Who do Omar Sacirbey and Muslim Advocates think they’re kidding? The editors of the quisling Washington Post, no doubt.

Poll: Should Sharia Law be banned in the United States?

The notorious Farhana Khera, President of Muslim Advocates, is known for her pro-terror activism. Khera attacked successful FBI stings as “entrapment operations” targeting innocent civilians (who wanted to blow up buildings, bridges etc.). Khera accused the FBI of “planting informants” in “American Muslim congregations” “without evidence of wrongdoing.” Khera defended Foad Farahi, the  Miami imam who had known links to terrorists. And she supported the terror-linked imam Ahmed Afzali, who tipped off the 9/11 subway bomb plotter Najibullah Zazi — a plot that would have slaughtered thousands in NYC on 9/11. There’s much more on this jihad supporter here.

Muslim advocates

What is the conclusion of the Muslim Advocates smear report. They instruct readers to report any and all postings that offend Muslims. They give step by step instructions on how to do that. So while they try to legislate free speech, they use other mechanisms to shut down the last refuge for truth seekers.

- See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2014/05/washington-post-calls-muslim-restri...

Views: 640

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

F/ islam and F/the post !

How many of this bunch are US CITIZENS? ZERO then they have NO rights to FREE speach, and trying to change this great country they all want to come to. LEAVE GO BACK TO WHERE YOU CAME FROM.

Beware they are in our political body. This is just the beginning.

Total true Odessa! I even got an e-mail on my facebook suggest they were already taking over the US! "You will be a Muslim!" Of course I sent back what he needed to hear! He should buy the company that makes body bags!

Getting the point, America? These vile vermin are everywhere planning and executing for their rise to power no matter what or how ridiculous they look or say, and Americans act like the British and let them get away with it without protesting and exposing their despicable hatred toward anything not Islamic. They have quashed speech for thousand of years and want the entire world to fold under them. Wake up, America.

This is very true about England and also started in Canada! In Canada one Pastor was told a letter to a newspaper that was asking for opinions was a hate letter. All it did was quote Romans chapter one word for word! He was imprisoned and fined 5000! The paper gave the man his due honor of freedom of speech but true hate groups protested and he was arrested and changed!

Hitler used a two pronged approach in the battlefield and in politics. America has this now with Obama being an admitted Muslim, which he lied about before, and a very devout Marxist! We should admit that the Left media is no longer viable with news coverage and it must support radical Socialism or Marxism! If I had my way, every lie they support of say just to support Marxist ideas, they would be arrested and tried for treason. This is what we use to do! The Philippines have their Army take care of the Marxists! This was working pretty well and the Muslim radicals were fighting with the Marxists! Suddenly it stopped! Sure it is for the one world order!

the constitutional purpose of a free press is to report objectively and truthfully as an understood oversight of govt' for the people, without bias or white house Administrative lapdog tendencies-the Washington post abdicates it's position as a credible source of believable information and sinks into the realm of white house public relations campaign-ism ...... there are parallels Obama seeks to incarcerate the country under his rule and Islam seeks to incarcerate the world under it's rule-and yes they(Islamic's) are in the white house Obama is probably one of them regardless of whether he admits it or not!!

Sure, lets put "Islamic restrictions on internet free speech", and the first thing the towel-heads would do is make every word an insult against Allah and cut the heads off everyone that mentions the Islam world including the POST.

Well how about this  .. Your mohammad was a pediphile. he was not a prophet from GOD  BUT FROM SATAN .. take your sharia your rag heads and go home where you can practice your warped religion to your hearts content ..

What makes you think that Joseph is a Muslim? I see what he means! Stopping one group or belief from free speech will give an open door to do what is written! They will put you in prison for My name sake! We also know that many will be beheaded in the end of the beginning! I am sure most saved will not go through the whole Tribulation! It is promised but it could be the first 3 and a half years!

What you suggest about Mohammed is very much probably true since those that support the absolute Karan just kidnapped Christian girls and will rape and/or marry them against their will!

Note that Obama's wife held up a sign of APPROVAL by suggesting meekly, let the girls go! What did this really mean? It meant Obama will keep hands off and do nothing, as usual! What he will do is show, only! We can thank fools, even actors in Hollywood for supporting this anti-freedom and anti-American brainwashed fool!

Here's a post for you muslime bastards, get the hell OUT of MY country! That includes our crummy potus!

I know that you will NEVER assimilate into OUR culture, so take YOUR culture straight to HELL!




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service