Trump wiretap is the REAL scandal of the US election, bogus Russia story is the real cover-up

Image result for obamagateBack on 10th October 2016, shortly after the US intelligence community published its first claim that Russia was trying to interfere in the US election, I wrote an article for The Duran in which I pointed out that the true story was that for the first time in its history the US intelligence community was interfering in a US election in order to swing the election behind its favoured candidate – Hillary Clinton – and that the practices the US intelligence community had honed to interfere in elections in other countries were now being imported to the US.

In an article for The Duran on 31st October 2016 – just a week before the election – I said that Hillary Clinton and her supporters had a planted a bomb under US democracy by orchestrating a campaign claiming that her opponent Donald Trump was the favoured candidate of Russia, and that the result would be that if Donald Trump were elected his legitimacy as President would be challenged.

In a further article for The Duran on 10th December 2016, in the fraught run up to the inauguration and whilst the Democrats and the Hillary Clinton campaign were actively lobbying electors on the Electoral College to disregard the results of the election and to vote against Donald Trump, I said that the CIA and the US intelligence community by playing up the paranoia against Russia were engaging in what amounted to a coup against the country’s constitutionally elected President.  The word ‘coup’ is now also being used by people like Mark Levin to describe what has been happening.

What we now learn is that the Obama administration, of which Hillary Clinton was once a part, used the US’s federal security and intelligence agencies during the election to spy on Hillary Clinton’s opponent, Donald Trump, and on his campaign.  They did so despite the fact that no evidence existed or has ever come to light of any wrongdoing by Donald Trump or by anyone else working on his behalf or for his campaign such as would normally justify surveillance.

This is the true scandal of the US Presidential election of 2016.  By contrast the various claims of Russian interference in the election are unproven and threadbare and almost certainly wrong, whilst the claims of illicit contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia are undoubtedly false and wrong.

Donald Trump is comparing this scandal to Watergate.  On any objective assessment it is far worse than Watergate.  The reason Richard Nixon had to set up his own amateur intelligence agency within the White House to carry out his ‘dirty tricks’ – the so-called “White House plumbers” – was because the federal security and intelligence agencies – the CIA and FBI – refused to do his bidding by acting against his political opponents.  By contrast on this occasion these same federal security and intelligence agencies have actively colluded in taking action against Donald Trump – the Obama administration’s and Hillary Clinton’s electoral opponent – by carrying out surveillance upon him and his associates though there has never been any evidence that either he or they did anything wrong.  That is something which ought to cause serious concern to people, though so far with the exception of a small number of people it does not appear to be doing so.

read more:

http://theduran.com/trump-wiretap-true-scandal/

Views: 1157

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

So, damn what?  Where are the indictments?  Will there ever be an indictment? Doubtful.

Look we simply must come to an understanding or go nuts... the rule of law doesn't apply to those in Washington, DC.

 I was wanting to know, did Trump bring in his on team to investigate this issue, or did he allow the FBI and the CIA of the establishment look into this for him. Its like, letting the spy team investigate them self.

If I see or hear one more person call them Main Street media I'm going to SCREAM!!!!!!  They are nothing but lefty Propagandist operatives.  So please don't ever call them main street media to me.

Cathy,

You have just raised a point that the Progressive Liberal Democrat Party relies on, and that is the fact that people, in order to be thought of as kind, tolerant, sweetly intentioned, and dressed in their political correct goody two shoes, will not name things what they truly are, but will instead coat them with honey so that their tender little tummies and baby minds can deal with the depraved monsters of menace engaged in the destruction of America.

For instance, Gitmo terrorists are released at the risk of many returning  to the "battlefield."

Battlefield? There isn't any battlefield at all. Terrorists aren't lined up facing opposition across a disputed no man's land. They are terrorists, not warriors. What an insult it is to insinuate that they are something more dignified than rabid rats infected with diseased minds shot to hell with phony religion as the powder.

Main stream media. The name is so wonderful, so innocent, so benign, and all it does is support nearly every ones view, or every ones view that matters that is, so that is why the word "Main" is used in it. So, we all must hop on our tricycles and ride on down the sidewalk in our cute little clothes.   And, above all remember, don't be ugly. Others will notice, you know. Be sweet.

This mind set is what the DNC faces as opposition. Is it any wonder that we are scorned and laughed at?

this CNN obsession with the Trump/Russian fake news story is getting pretty humorous...  when considering that the introduction of fake news being a legitimate concern was done by obie. Correct me here if I'm wrong -- I think Breitbart deserves a bunch of credit for having the foresight to recognize obie's intent in legitimizing the term fake news and the opportunity it provided. As I saw it Breitbart immediately pounced on boomeranging the term on obie's intent. Jumped right up and started aggressively using the term where it belongs.

Now not only has CNN claimed the throne of fake news, the attention it has drawn has also exposed their fake twitter followers... 17 million of them. If Breitbart doesn't let up on their aggression towards using the fake news label where it belongs, which there's no reason to think they will, it looks like CNN is going to rue the day obie legitimized the term.   ....and that has an irony to it that is quite pleasant  ;' /

MEMO to CNN and the rest of the corrupt Media: ...'Your chickens are coming home to Roost!'

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by Tom StiglichPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Fact Check:   'Joe Biden Claims ‘We Didn’t Lock People Up In Cages’

CLAIM: Former Vice President Joe Biden claimed, on immigration: “We didn’t lock people up in cages.”

VERDICT: FALSE. The “cages” were built by the Obama-Biden administration.

Univision moderator Jorge Ramos asked Biden at the third Democrat debate at Texas Southern University in Houston, Texas, why Latinos should trust him after the Obama administration continued deporting “undocumented immigrants.”

Biden claimed that the Obama administration’s policies were more humane than those of President Donald Trump: “We didn’t lock people up in cages,” he said.

In fact, the “cages” were built by the Obama administration to deal with a surge of unaccompanied minors who crossed the border illegally in 2014.

Originally, the Obama administration was “warehousing” children — literally — in overwhelmed Border Patrol facilities. Breitbart News broke the story of the surge, which was partly triggered by Obama’s policy of allowing illegal alien children who entered the country as minors to stay in the country (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA).

Above image credit: AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin, Pool, File

The above photo was published by the Associated Press in June 2014, and the photo below is of Obama’s Secretary of Homeland Security, Jeh Johnson, touring a Border Patrol facility with “cages.”


Above: Border Patrol officers escort Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson and Gov. Jan Brewer through the department’s Nogales processing facility for immigrant children. (Photo courtesy Barry Bahler/Department of Homeland Security)

The “cages” are chain-link enclosures in Border Patrol processing facilities that are meant to protect children from adults in custody. They are not permanent accommodations.

In mid-2018, as the Trump administration began enforcing a “zero tolerance” policy that stopped the “catch-and-release” policy of letting illegal aliens go after they were arrested. Detaining adults and children meant that children had to be processed separately; the enclosures prevented adults from harming children.

As Breitbart News reported at the time, children were not housed in “cages.” They were processed and then taken to shelters, where they were given medical care, toiletries, education, recreation, and counseling, and where staff attempted to find relatives or sponsors to whom they could be released.

Democrats began tweeting images of “kids in cages” to condemn the Trump administration. Journalists, too, shared those images.

One problem: they were taken during the Obama administration.

Public outrage at the images led President Trump to end the policy, and require families to be detained together.

Democrats keep repeating the mistake, however: in July, they had to delete a tweet that used an image from the Obama era and cited the “inhumane treatment” of children by the Trump administration.

Republicans argue that not detaining illegal aliens is actually the cruel policy, because it encourages migrants to undertake a dangerous journey, often guided by cartels and smugglers.

As Breitbart News’ Alana Mastrangelo noted recently:

But what’s worse than “cages,” however, are reports of migrant children also being handed over to human traffickers during the Obama administration — while Biden was vice president — according to the New York Times. Between October 2013 and July 2015 alone, nearly 80,000 unaccompanied children from Central American countries were detained by U.S. authorities.

It remains unclear how many of the tens of thousands of children were handed over to human traffickers — including sex traffickers — during that span of nearly two years, as those cases are reportedly not tracked.

“Others were ransomed by the very smugglers to whom their families paid thousands of dollars to sneak them into the United States,” reported the New York Times in 2015, during Obama’s presidency and Biden’s vice presidency. “Some lost limbs during the journey or found themselves sold into sexual slavery.”

Biden told voters in South Carolina last month that he would close all border detention facilities, guaranteeing that the migrant flow would continue.

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service