Trump on Putin being a 'killer': 'What do you think — our country's so innocent?'

Image result for clinton body countPresident Trump questioned the innocence of the U.S. because it has "a lot of killers," during an exchange about working with Russia to defeat terrorism abroad.

During a clip of a interview with Fox News' Bill O'Reilly, set to air Sunday before the Super Bowl, Trump was questioned on whether he respects Russian President Vladimir Putin.

"I do respect him but —," Trump started to say.

"Do you? Why?", O'Reilly interrupted.

read more:

Views: 349

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

President Trump sometimes will make judgement errors, as all of us do.

First of all, he agreed to appear on O'Reilly, which is a gross mistake. The only one who has anything to gain from an interview with O'Reilly is never the guest, and in particular a guest such as Donald Trump. O'Reilly thinks (and he said so) that Obama is smart and intelligent, and neither are true, and O'Reilly obviously never thought much of Trump even as a candidate so why would he now. Well, he wouldn't, and doesn't.

So, Mr. Trump, you just made a bad deal by being on his arrogant show. It was a no win proposition for you.

Second, President Trump blew it big time in virtually excusing the murderous thug Putin by stating that America has a lot of Killers, as if that truism pardons Putin. It doesn't have a damn thing to do with anything Putin has done, or will do for that matter.

I hope President Trump will refrain from more bad deals by appearing on O'Reilly and allowing him to goad Trump into making asinine comments such as this.

My view.


I don't disagree with a lot of what you said. 

I, for one, don't know why DJT didn't go on Hannity? He always was on his side and I don't remember him ever saying anything bad about him. 

O'Reilly admits he is not a conservative, but an Independent and to me is "too politically correct" on many things. Especially, about barrack hussein obama. 

It does smack of 0 and his putting America down. Not his best move.

And you are right, O'Reilly is not the show to go on. He should have chosen OANN, Hannity or Dobbs.


Not sure what's happening but I have no issues. I was wondering what happened to you because I have not seen your comments for some time. Glad your back and hope Dee responds to help.
I agreed with everything he said. I rather have Russia as an Ali than an enemy

The old saying, "keep your friends close and your enemies CLOSER", would apply here I think..

I love listening to Lou Dobbs and Sean Hannity, I don't listen to O'Reilly anymore just for that reason, he interrupts everyone and he needs a leason in humility.

this is going to be a long hard fight to get this country back on track...get use to it

the usa has been a nation of killers for 44 years since abortion became legal and included with that is that you can be in the usa illegally , kill americans and be immune from prosecution if you live in a sanctuary city

I chalk this up to Trump's lack of eloquence.  He has often said things in a sloppy way.

Trump isn't a two face glib politician. He says things without sugar coating anything. That's why I voted for him. He'll say what's on his mind.


But non-careful wording allow the weakminded, not to mention the bums & communists to misinterpret his statements.




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service