Then said he unto the disciples, It is impossible, but the offenses will come, but woe unto him through whom they come! It were better for him that a millstone was hanged about his neck, and he cast into the sea than that he should offend one of these little ones – Luke 17:1-2

After years of being called a liar, a misogynist, and a fascist President Trump raised the ire of the baby killers of the socialist left .Trump has once ruled that healthcare workers and doctors who have religious beliefs or moral convictions cannot be forced to take part in the performance of abortions. While the ACLU and Planned Parenthood are clutching their pearls and call it an obstruction to the access a woman needs to procure her “healthcare needs,” most citizens of our country do not believe that abortion on demand at any stage of pregnancy is good policy. The debate can no longer be on the abortionist’s terms, but on the terms stipulated through religious texts. It is not about being for or against a woman’s “right to choose,” it is about the baby’s right to live, which is the fundamental right of all persons. The National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association claim “that it gives individuals and organizations new rights to refuse to provide healthcare services.”

It’s time to be honest. Abortion is not “healthcare services,” “reproductive services,” or family planning. Is it considered “healthcare” when a newborn is now legally left to die within sight of its mother on the cold steel of a hospital tray? Is it healthcare for those who perform this procedure ignore the movement, the crying, the pain the child goes through as it slowly dies in their sight. As trained medical professionals, do they not believe in the sanctity of life? It is by all measures the conduit of using the murder of an innocent child as birth control in many cases. These same groups are fine with graphic sex educations starting at 5, of teaching about oral sex and condoms to middle schoolers.

Planned Parenthood president Leena Wen claims that “No one should have to worry if they will get the right care or information because of the providers’ personal beliefs. My question is this- if you are concerned with getting the proper knowledge or attention because of the providers’ beliefs, wouldn’t it make more sense to have a provider who agrees to perform the abortion procedure with no conscience or ill feelings?

It is not a question of the woman’s right. But the responsibility of the woman to follow the laws that make us better than animals. It is a natural law that is at issue. As stated in the Constitution, “We are endowed by our Creator with the right to life.” We have no right, except in the case of war, to take an innocent life with some form of punishment in this world of the next.

Or is this explained by a lust for power, for attempting to force everyone to agree or keep silent? Isn’t this in and of itself a form of tyranny? The attacks on any who disagree, the violence and insults against the Christian belief that abortion is wrong a form of fascism. And how can you explain the anger and abrogation of civil rights for those of fundamental Christian beliefs? Is this not a violation of their civil rights? Why is it permissible to tears down pro-life posters, or allow pictures of the procedure, or even let the woman to see a sonogram of her child before she kills it? It’s because those who perform these procedures know that it is, in fact, the taking of innocent life.

Embryological science has advanced to the point that it can known with certainty that the unborn are human beings from the point of conception. Those who raise the flag for abortion ignore the last 40 years of science and want you to consider the opinions they hold to be more relevant. They proclaim that abortion is a “constitutional civil human right.”

A short time ago, a church in Delaware County, the Notre Dame de Lourdes Parish was defaced with pro-abortion graffiti in Philadelphia. Abortion is part of a full attack on Christians and the beliefs of those Christians that they do their best to live out every day. Strengthened by the progressive socialists, they feel that they must force religion into the background to complete the agenda that have for the country. Disconcerting to them is the rise in the pro-life dedication of millennials who are more than willing to be outspoken and passionate in the beliefs they hold. The younger generation has the ability to see their child very early on due to advances in science. They understand that the baby responds to music at 14 weeks and at 20 weeks has a complete nervous system that can feel pain. They know that a baby before being born is not just a clump of cells or a parasite as has been taught.

They are more concerned with the profit factor, so much so, that they expect the American taxpayers to subsidize these barbaric acts. The newest fight is over the Hyde Amendment, which prohibits the use of government funds for abortions. Rather than doing away with the Hyde Amendment, why doesn’t Planned Parenthood use the monies they receive from selling baby body parts and forgo another Lamborghini?

Illinois and New York are infanticide states that now support legal abortions up to and after the moment of birth. The blood of innocent children is on their hands, and yet the progressive socialists who pass such laws actually stood up and applauded the passage of these bills. The called that Healthcare rights of the women in the state. I would love to see them explain these rights to a husband and wife who have tried to have a child for six years. When the couple finally got pregnant, after three months she miscarried. Tell them about healthcare rights. I want to see one of these baby killers look the woman right in the eyes and tell her that her miscarriage was a good thing and no big deal, it was just a clump of cells.

And please, don’t claim that pregnancies cannot be prevented if you don’t want the child. Various forms of birth control, condoms, and yes, even abstinence are all choices if you choose not to get pregnant. Even our past President talked of saddling a teenage girl with a baby is not a choice. It is a choice, live a clean moral life under God’s laws, and the pregnancy is no longer a problem. Even if you can’t, there are ways to avoid pregnancy as mentioned above. It is not the responsibility of any woman to abort her baby because she refuses to take responsibility for the bad choices that she makes. The three primary reasons for abortions are the concern or responsibility for another human being, the inability to afford to raise a child, of not wanting the intrusion of a child on work or life in general.

Hollywood, in the absurd ranting of those like Alyssa Milano, has also contributed to the degradation of the American culture and the American family. They have called for a boycott of Georgia and Alabama over news laws restricting most abortions. These self-same self-important celebrities are more concerned with how chickens are treated in the fast food business than they are about murdered children.

Related Articles:

  http://www.intellectualconservative.com/the-progressives-socialist-...

    http://www.intellectualconservative.com/the-progressive-socialist-a...

   http://www.intellectualconservative.com/the-progressive-socialists-...

John Veliseks’ new book “One Patriots Opinion- for the Forgotten Men and Women of America” is now available on Kindle/Nook. Patriots! It is time to fight back.

https://www.amazon.com/One-Patriots-Opinion-Forgotten-America-ebook...

Views: 13

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

 I will not buy from the globalist website Amazon. But this is a nice share.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Bob Gorrell

Political Cartoons by Tom StiglichPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

YIKES!!! Chelsea Clinton Emphatically States A Person With A Beard And A Penis Can ‘Absolutely’ Identify As A Woman

  • The one issue Hillary and Chelsea don’t appear to agree on entirely is transgender self-identification
  • In an interview with The Sunday Times, journalist Decca Aitkenhead asked the Clintons about transgender self-identification
  • Chelsea Clinton replied ‘yes’ emphatically when asked if someone with a beard and penis can ever be a woman
  • ‘It’s going to take a lot more time and effort to understand what it means to be defining yourself differently,’ Hillary said
  • Aitkenhead said Hillary became ‘uneasy’ when the question was asked while Chelsea shot a ‘furious stare’ at the journalist as her mother answered
  • Hillary added: ‘It’s a very big generational discussion, because this is not something I grew up with or ever saw’

(Daily Mail) – It may appear Hillary and Chelsea Clinton always see eye-to-eye, but in a recent interview one topic cracked the facade of the like-minded mother-daughter power duo.

The one issue Hillary and Chelsea don’t appear to agree on entirely is transgender self-identification.

In an interview with The Sunday Times, journalist Decca Aitkenhead asked the Clintons if someone with a beard and a penis can ever be a woman, to which Chelsea replied emphatically, ‘Yes.’

However, as Aitkenhead describes it, Hillary looked ‘uneasy’, and blamed generational gaps for being less accepting.

‘Errr. I’m just learning about this,’ Hillary responded. ‘It’s a very big generational discussion, because this is not something I grew up with or ever saw. It’s going to take a lot more time and effort to understand what it means to be defining yourself differently.’

The Clintons sat sown with Aitkenhead to promote the book they co-authored, The Book of Gutsy Women: Favorite Stories of Courage and Resilience.

The book features Danica Roem, the first trans woman elected to a U.S. state legislature.

According Aitkenhead’s account, she tells Hillary during the interview that many British feminists of Hillary’s generation have a problem with the idea that a ‘lesbian who doesn’t want to sleep with someone who has a penis is transphobic.’

Hillary nods in agreement, while Chelsea ‘stiffens and stares at me’, according to Aitkenhead.

The journalist then adds that many women of Hillary’s generation are uncomfortable with biological males sharing women’s bathrooms.

‘I would say that, absolutely,’ Hillary nods firmly. ‘Absolutely. Yes.’

That’s when Chelsea begins shooting a ‘furious stare’ at Aitkenhead, who points it out to her.

‘I’m a terrible actor’, Chelsea laughs.

Chelsea then says she is thrilled with the National Health Service’s decision to assign patients to single-sex wards according to the gender they identify as, instead of their biological make up.

‘How can you treat someone if you don’t recognize who they feel and know in their core they are?’ Chelsea says.

‘And I strongly support children being able to play on the sports teams that match their own gender identity,’ she adds. ‘I think we need to be doing everything we can to support kids in being whoever they know themselves to be and discovering who they are.’

At this point Hillary looks conflicted.

‘I think you’ve got to be sensitive to how difficult this is,’ Hillary says. ‘There are women who’d say [to a trans woman], ”You know what, you’ve never had the kind of life experiences that I’ve had. So I respect who you are, but don’t tell me you’re the same as me.” I hear that conversation all the time.’

Despite the clear tension in the room, the pair say they don’t argue about this topic.

But according to Aitkenhead, ‘I get the impression they don’t like to present anything less than a united front to the world.’

BONUS VIDEO

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service