The progressive endgame, and how to prevent it

Posted by Jeff G

It is clear now that the Obama/Reid plan to refuse negotiations — again, the GOP is asking for universal delay of ObamaCare rather than Obama’s selective waivers; and it asking that Congress be compelled to follow the law it passed, nothing more — is orchestrated and intended to move directly to the debt limit debate, which the President, his administration, progressives, the news media, academics, and leftwing law professors (but I repeat myself) are busy laying the rhetorical ground work for. The play is this:  Obama will (and already has) try to draw a distinction between the government “shutdown” (which is really nothing more than the temporary closing of non-essential governmental functions and the furloughing of employees who will be reimbursed after the shutdown for time missed) and what he’s calling an impending “economic” shutdown, which he is using to try to worry the markets, scare those who receive social security or disability benefits, etc., and gin up a Constitutional “crisis” that the left has been plotting for some time now:  using the 14th Amendment (and completely inverting the INTENT of specific language), the President plans to argue — and receive intellectual and media cover — that if the House refuses to raise the debt limit, he is put into an untenable position:  either he follow the Constitution and abides the House, in which case, he’ll claim, the US will “not be able to pay its bills” and will “default”; or else he must of necessity circumvent the Constitution and unilaterally raise the debt limit without Congressional authorization in order to avoid a “default” and a world-wide economic collapse. He will be lying. First, there will only be a default should Jack Lew and the President refuse to prioritize spending and pay the interest on the debt, bonds, and essential services — and monthly revenues are in excess of those payments.  Meaning, revenues are in excess of any supposed lack of money to bring about default.  Lew has already indicated he is willing to go this route, calling the prioritizing of spending “unworkable” — which is a falsehood, but even were it not, it should indicate to every American that the federal government has lost fiscal and economic control altogether and is simply spending until an inevitable collapse.

- See more at:

Views: 652

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Good summary, telling it like it is! Thanks.

If they don't pay Social Security  there will be big trouble. People will get really mad and hungry.


Could it be Satan?

How much more warning do we need, before we act and send BHO and Harry out to pasture?  Are we paying attention, or are we asleep?  Let's not wait until we all are confront by gun wielding government goons.  Sound off your anger to Congress and the White House.  Send letters, emails, and make phone calls.  Then, when you ge the chance, vote these traitors out for good!

We'll fight these Progressive Marxists until Hell freezes over~~Then we'll fight'em on the ice~~America will survive and these Usurpers will Not~~Tyrants don't learn from history~~Mussolini~~His Whore~~Sadam and his henchmen~~Hitler all ended up dying the hard way~~We The People~~Not~~We The Sheeple~~as the Hero Todd Beemer said on flight 93~~"Let's Roll" !

Playing the Cloward Piven Strategy to the end! Hold firm!
Look at the comments in the "call to action " posting on the Oath Keepers website.

If the Democrats refuse to negotiate the shutdown is on them and they already said they didn't care how long it lasts.  The Republican Bill funds every bit of the government needs except Obamacare which 60% of the American people do not want, again proving that the Republican Party is truly the party that represents the people.  If they negotiated and debated the bill  AS THEY SHOULD then there would be no problem as the Senators are not all stupid and I am sure they could come up with an equitable solution.

So what is new. I think the media is not so sure of it's being able to push this Administrations agenda to the degree it has in the past. In addition to flooding ones Congressional members, we the people, should take the fight right to the doorsteps of the lame-stream medias offices and studios. Let them know we will not stand for their lying, we will correct those lies and pass on the truth loud and clear. If they won't report on the protesters on their doorsteps, oh well there are plenty of other media outlets who will, and millions of phone with video cameras willing and able to make the videos and put them up on YouTube. Thus making the rounds faster than Madam First Lady can put out a new edict to the American people to change their evil eating habits. The American people know the truth of this matter, and are keeping pressure on Congress through their grass-roots upsurge, which will not be squelched by anyone, no matter how much they rail against us.

It has been clear to conservatives what the administrations intent was all along. They hate Christians, success in any people not belonging to the communist party, I mean progressive party! From the Potus saying the US is not a nation of Christians and his wife Michele saying for the first time in her life she was proud of the US all the while hating the Flag and what it stands for. People we surely have a lot of pain and probably blood we will give in order to get the United States back to the land of Freedom and the dream of the rest of the world. Focus is needed and an undying spirit. We will overcome!

"Circumventing the Constitution" is a criminal act for anyone who has taken an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution; AND OBAMA HAS. Any reason offered to the contrary including preventing the stars from falling from the heavens simply does not signify.




Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by Michael RamirezPolitical Cartoons by Bob Gorrell


YIKES!!! Chelsea Clinton Emphatically States A Person With A Beard And A Penis Can ‘Absolutely’ Identify As A Woman

  • The one issue Hillary and Chelsea don’t appear to agree on entirely is transgender self-identification
  • In an interview with The Sunday Times, journalist Decca Aitkenhead asked the Clintons about transgender self-identification
  • Chelsea Clinton replied ‘yes’ emphatically when asked if someone with a beard and penis can ever be a woman
  • ‘It’s going to take a lot more time and effort to understand what it means to be defining yourself differently,’ Hillary said
  • Aitkenhead said Hillary became ‘uneasy’ when the question was asked while Chelsea shot a ‘furious stare’ at the journalist as her mother answered
  • Hillary added: ‘It’s a very big generational discussion, because this is not something I grew up with or ever saw’

(Daily Mail) – It may appear Hillary and Chelsea Clinton always see eye-to-eye, but in a recent interview one topic cracked the facade of the like-minded mother-daughter power duo.

The one issue Hillary and Chelsea don’t appear to agree on entirely is transgender self-identification.

In an interview with The Sunday Times, journalist Decca Aitkenhead asked the Clintons if someone with a beard and a penis can ever be a woman, to which Chelsea replied emphatically, ‘Yes.’

However, as Aitkenhead describes it, Hillary looked ‘uneasy’, and blamed generational gaps for being less accepting.

‘Errr. I’m just learning about this,’ Hillary responded. ‘It’s a very big generational discussion, because this is not something I grew up with or ever saw. It’s going to take a lot more time and effort to understand what it means to be defining yourself differently.’

The Clintons sat sown with Aitkenhead to promote the book they co-authored, The Book of Gutsy Women: Favorite Stories of Courage and Resilience.

The book features Danica Roem, the first trans woman elected to a U.S. state legislature.

According Aitkenhead’s account, she tells Hillary during the interview that many British feminists of Hillary’s generation have a problem with the idea that a ‘lesbian who doesn’t want to sleep with someone who has a penis is transphobic.’

Hillary nods in agreement, while Chelsea ‘stiffens and stares at me’, according to Aitkenhead.

The journalist then adds that many women of Hillary’s generation are uncomfortable with biological males sharing women’s bathrooms.

‘I would say that, absolutely,’ Hillary nods firmly. ‘Absolutely. Yes.’

That’s when Chelsea begins shooting a ‘furious stare’ at Aitkenhead, who points it out to her.

‘I’m a terrible actor’, Chelsea laughs.

Chelsea then says she is thrilled with the National Health Service’s decision to assign patients to single-sex wards according to the gender they identify as, instead of their biological make up.

‘How can you treat someone if you don’t recognize who they feel and know in their core they are?’ Chelsea says.

‘And I strongly support children being able to play on the sports teams that match their own gender identity,’ she adds. ‘I think we need to be doing everything we can to support kids in being whoever they know themselves to be and discovering who they are.’

At this point Hillary looks conflicted.

‘I think you’ve got to be sensitive to how difficult this is,’ Hillary says. ‘There are women who’d say [to a trans woman], ”You know what, you’ve never had the kind of life experiences that I’ve had. So I respect who you are, but don’t tell me you’re the same as me.” I hear that conversation all the time.’

Despite the clear tension in the room, the pair say they don’t argue about this topic.

But according to Aitkenhead, ‘I get the impression they don’t like to present anything less than a united front to the world.’


© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service