Progressive Chains and “Liberating Tolerance”

A 'Short & to the point' article by my good friend  Jim 'The SEAL' O'Neill

We have been, and are being, manipulated by globalist social engineers who have foisted on us a humorless demand that we live our lives their way...or else

Progressive Chains and “Liberating Tolerance”

Slow and methodical over the last century was the march of socialists / communists / fascists / progressives / collectivists / liberals (they have so many names it is even hard to keep up with that), until Obama’s election when the gears went into overdrive.

...Prior to now it has been incremental, the slippery slope, the inch by inch erosion of unalienable rights.  Like a slow developing disease, they have gradually weakened the main body of country, so as now the disease can just finish it off in big bites at a time; socialized health care, energy restrictions, political correctness, executive edicts without the consent of the governed, continual reductions of property rights, illegal immigration - amnesty, etc.  The centralized power of the Federal government is in full tilt, while individual rights to pursue life, liberty and happiness are becoming a distant dream.—Cheryl Pass “Classical Progressivism Vs American Exceptionalism

“Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you.  May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams  (1722-1803)
Freedom…. [cont.]
Sometimes I feel just like I’m almost gone
Sometimes I feel like I’m almost gone
Sometimes I feel just like I’m almost gone
A long… way…from my home
Richie Havens (1941-2013) “Freedom” (“Motherless Child”)

It is an obvious truism that the larger the government, the smaller the amount of personal freedom.  When I recently wrote that I concur with Thoreau’s axiom “That government is best which governs least,” it was simply another way of saying that I value my freedom.  That government is best that robs you of the least amount of freedom.

It’s not rocket science folks—the bigger your government, the smaller your freedom.  As a government’s bureaucracy grows, so does the amount of concomitant rules and regulations that constrict freedom—as night follows the day.

POLL: Do you believe the United States government is beginning to resemble a totalitarian regime?

That is why America’s Founding Framers (who valued freedom) created the US Constitution.  It was designed specifically to rein-in and control government, and thereby protect the freedom of “we the people.”  The Framers saw the form of government that they invented as being a necessary evil—a compromise between the chaos of anarchy and the oppression of tyranny.  Today we find ourselves far, far removed from what they intended for us, and what they intended our government to be.  Our government “representatives” (and military brass) consistently ignore their oaths to “protect and defend” the US Constitution, and treat their “solemn” oaths as if they were irrelevant jokes. 

The social engineering types that favor big government have zero interest in freedom.  They are interested in forcing you to live your life their way, and only their way.  If you value your freedom, then you must, as a matter of course, stand in opposition to them.

Those of us who were shocked out of our “boiled frog syndrome” daze by the stunning overreach of the Obama Administration, were often dismayed by how far along “the road to serfdom” we awoke to find ourselves (“When did this happen?”).

If you have done your homework, you know that it didn’t happen overnight.  “We the people” find ourselves in our current predicament because we were asleep at the wheel (at least many of us were—all too many still are).  Also, of course, the longtime tireless efforts of the enemies of freedom must be taken into account.

This article is not so much concerned with the chains that have been oh so cleverly, slowly, and gently laid on “we the people” over the last century or so.  It is mainly about one particular link in those chains.

I am speaking of “liberating tolerance” (also called “partisan tolerance”).  “Liberating tolerance” is a term coined by Frankfurt School Marxist extraordinaire, Herbert Marcuse

He meant for it to be used as an antidote to tolerance.  That is, as an anti-tolerance stratagem hidden in plain sight under an innocuous (even uplifting) sounding name.  It was designed to replace classical (i.e. “repressive”) tolerance. 

“Liberating tolerance, then, would mean intolerance against movements from the Right and toleration of movements from the Left.”  Herbert Marcuse [emphasis mine]
“Liberating tolerance” is actually the height (or depth) of hypocrisy and intolerance—and it is increasingly being used to silence dissent and steal our freedoms.

read more:

Views: 260

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I keep saying it, This is a Newly Forming Marxist Country.

if you read anything by cloward and piven, or saul alinsky....Obama is following their doctrine to the exact item by item...its like Obama is just following their lists of how to bring down a democracy....its almost scary to read these two.

We The People can change OUR COUNTRY back to what she was before Obama - - - -

Yes with ties to collective bargaining only for government agents and officials.  All others are not entitled.  The citizenry will be allowed to live in citizen zones only.  One Nation under Fraud with Lies and, spying for all.

Diversity is a dangerous metaphor for division, confusion and
mediocrity. College students fall prey to what G.K. Chesterton said about people, “When people stop believing in God, they don’t believe in nothing, -- they believe in anything.” 
It is the failure of the American Character to retain its Christian belief that we are created by God in His image. As Francis Schaeffer has written, all of these forms of cultural dissolution have “come about due to a shift in worldview...a worldview based on the idea that the final reality is impersonal matter or energy shaped into its current form by impersonal chance.”

I Agree 100% with Your Post, you just left out ONE VITAL thing in their OATHS that take and that is to Perserve, Not To Change .  I think todays Electied Temp. Servants Mouth the words  But have no under standing of the meaning . they say them just to get through a cermoney .  we need to creat a law with sever punshiments for disobaying their Oath Mabey that will Give the words Meaning.

Not much has changed yet.


Nope :/ 

But we Do have a Knight... And we are seeing just whom the the swamp consists of :)

Oh, was just bored, so I snooped around and checked out the blogs.

Just to see who I could wake up !!


I see. Too bad most from the 'old' days are gone :/

No, they are still here, some past away, I read a lot of different blogs, and some was well....not that good.

 But anyway, take care, LOL Tif


Diamond & Silk

Tea Party
Facebook & Twitter


Breaking: Jury Sides With Sheriff Joe
Smacks Down Establishment GOP’s Lawsuit

A jury has sided in favor of conservative icon, former Sheriff Joe Arpaio, against the lawsuit filed by Austin Flake, the son of GOP establishment Senator Jeff Flake, and Austin’s ex-wife, Logan Brown.

Flake and Brown had filed a lawsuit against the Arizona sheriff for “malicious prosecution” after over a dozen dogs died on their watch at a Gilbert dog kennel.

The jury decided Flake and Brown had failed to provide sufficient evidence to back up their accusations of malicious prosecution by Arpaio, The Associated Press reported via

Flake and Brown ran the kennel while Brown’s parents were out of town in 2014, the AP reported.

The two were still in college.

Initially, Flake and Brown were charged in the incident, but the charges were dropped at the prosecution’s request. Later, Flake’s in-laws pleaded guilty to animal cruelty charges after an expert determined that the facility air conditioner failed because it was not properly maintained.

Thus, the owners of the kennel were responsible for the death of the 21 dogs, and they answered for their crimes.

Nonetheless, Flake and Brown reportedly alleged that Arpaio had charged them to gain publicity and deal damage to Senator Flake — an establishment fixture within the GOP.

The two “contended the charges caused them emotional distress, contributed to the demise of their marriage and led the senator’s son to being suspended from college for an honor-code violation,” according to The Associated Press.

Despite the jury’s decision, the U.S. District Judge Neil V. Wake will not issue a final verdict until the defense explains why it didn’t turn over documents that may have benefited the plaintiffs, according to a statement from the plaintiffs’ attorney to The Associated Press.

“The struggle to hold government officials accountable has always required a steep, perilous climb,” the plaintiffs’ attorney said in a Friday statement according to KNPX.

“Although we disagree with the jury’s verdict, we are grateful we had the opportunity to force former Sheriff Arpaio and his subordinates at Maricopa County to account for their indisputably reckless conduct. Near the end of the trial, we discovered that the County failed to turn over documents that might have helped us prove our case,” he continued.

“The Court has ordered the County to explain its failure and indicated that it will not enter a final judgment in the case until a satisfactory explanation is provided. We will access our future options in this fight when the County complies with the Court’s Order.”

Charges that didn’t pan out are an annoyance to those affected — there’s no question of that.

But to claim that those charges — which were dropped — were the reason behind a failed marriage, and that Arpaio needs to pay is completely ridiculous.

What do you think about this story? Please share this on Facebook and Twitter and let us know!

Are you glad about the jury’s decision? Scroll down to comment below!


© 2017   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service