Progressive Chains and “Liberating Tolerance”

A 'Short & to the point' article by my good friend  Jim 'The SEAL' O'Neill

We have been, and are being, manipulated by globalist social engineers who have foisted on us a humorless demand that we live our lives their way...or else

Progressive Chains and “Liberating Tolerance”

Slow and methodical over the last century was the march of socialists / communists / fascists / progressives / collectivists / liberals (they have so many names it is even hard to keep up with that), until Obama’s election when the gears went into overdrive.

...Prior to now it has been incremental, the slippery slope, the inch by inch erosion of unalienable rights.  Like a slow developing disease, they have gradually weakened the main body of country, so as now the disease can just finish it off in big bites at a time; socialized health care, energy restrictions, political correctness, executive edicts without the consent of the governed, continual reductions of property rights, illegal immigration - amnesty, etc.  The centralized power of the Federal government is in full tilt, while individual rights to pursue life, liberty and happiness are becoming a distant dream.—Cheryl Pass “Classical Progressivism Vs American Exceptionalism

“Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you.  May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams  (1722-1803)
Freedom…. [cont.]
Sometimes I feel just like I’m almost gone
Sometimes I feel like I’m almost gone
Sometimes I feel just like I’m almost gone
A long… way…from my home
Richie Havens (1941-2013) “Freedom” (“Motherless Child”)

It is an obvious truism that the larger the government, the smaller the amount of personal freedom.  When I recently wrote that I concur with Thoreau’s axiom “That government is best which governs least,” it was simply another way of saying that I value my freedom.  That government is best that robs you of the least amount of freedom.

It’s not rocket science folks—the bigger your government, the smaller your freedom.  As a government’s bureaucracy grows, so does the amount of concomitant rules and regulations that constrict freedom—as night follows the day.

POLL: Do you believe the United States government is beginning to resemble a totalitarian regime?

That is why America’s Founding Framers (who valued freedom) created the US Constitution.  It was designed specifically to rein-in and control government, and thereby protect the freedom of “we the people.”  The Framers saw the form of government that they invented as being a necessary evil—a compromise between the chaos of anarchy and the oppression of tyranny.  Today we find ourselves far, far removed from what they intended for us, and what they intended our government to be.  Our government “representatives” (and military brass) consistently ignore their oaths to “protect and defend” the US Constitution, and treat their “solemn” oaths as if they were irrelevant jokes. 

The social engineering types that favor big government have zero interest in freedom.  They are interested in forcing you to live your life their way, and only their way.  If you value your freedom, then you must, as a matter of course, stand in opposition to them.

Those of us who were shocked out of our “boiled frog syndrome” daze by the stunning overreach of the Obama Administration, were often dismayed by how far along “the road to serfdom” we awoke to find ourselves (“When did this happen?”).

If you have done your homework, you know that it didn’t happen overnight.  “We the people” find ourselves in our current predicament because we were asleep at the wheel (at least many of us were—all too many still are).  Also, of course, the longtime tireless efforts of the enemies of freedom must be taken into account.

This article is not so much concerned with the chains that have been oh so cleverly, slowly, and gently laid on “we the people” over the last century or so.  It is mainly about one particular link in those chains.

I am speaking of “liberating tolerance” (also called “partisan tolerance”).  “Liberating tolerance” is a term coined by Frankfurt School Marxist extraordinaire, Herbert Marcuse

He meant for it to be used as an antidote to tolerance.  That is, as an anti-tolerance stratagem hidden in plain sight under an innocuous (even uplifting) sounding name.  It was designed to replace classical (i.e. “repressive”) tolerance. 

“Liberating tolerance, then, would mean intolerance against movements from the Right and toleration of movements from the Left.”  Herbert Marcuse [emphasis mine]
“Liberating tolerance” is actually the height (or depth) of hypocrisy and intolerance—and it is increasingly being used to silence dissent and steal our freedoms.

read more:

Views: 263

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I keep saying it, This is a Newly Forming Marxist Country.

if you read anything by cloward and piven, or saul alinsky....Obama is following their doctrine to the exact item by item...its like Obama is just following their lists of how to bring down a democracy....its almost scary to read these two.

We The People can change OUR COUNTRY back to what she was before Obama - - - -

Yes with ties to collective bargaining only for government agents and officials.  All others are not entitled.  The citizenry will be allowed to live in citizen zones only.  One Nation under Fraud with Lies and, spying for all.

Diversity is a dangerous metaphor for division, confusion and
mediocrity. College students fall prey to what G.K. Chesterton said about people, “When people stop believing in God, they don’t believe in nothing, -- they believe in anything.” 
It is the failure of the American Character to retain its Christian belief that we are created by God in His image. As Francis Schaeffer has written, all of these forms of cultural dissolution have “come about due to a shift in worldview...a worldview based on the idea that the final reality is impersonal matter or energy shaped into its current form by impersonal chance.”

I Agree 100% with Your Post, you just left out ONE VITAL thing in their OATHS that take and that is to Perserve, Not To Change .  I think todays Electied Temp. Servants Mouth the words  But have no under standing of the meaning . they say them just to get through a cermoney .  we need to creat a law with sever punshiments for disobaying their Oath Mabey that will Give the words Meaning.

Not much has changed yet.


Nope :/ 

But we Do have a Knight... And we are seeing just whom the the swamp consists of :)

Oh, was just bored, so I snooped around and checked out the blogs.

Just to see who I could wake up !!


I see. Too bad most from the 'old' days are gone :/

No, they are still here, some past away, I read a lot of different blogs, and some was well....not that good.

 But anyway, take care, LOL Tif





Rush Limbaugh Explains How Robert Mueller
Will Attempt To Financially Destroy President Trump

 Special Counsel Robert Mueller has crossed President Trump’s “red line” after issuing a subpoena for documents related to the Trump Organization’s business dealings with Russia.

New York Times reports:

The special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, has subpoenaed the Trump Organization to turn over documents, including some related to Russia, according to two people briefed on the matter. The order is the first known time that the special counsel demanded documents directly related to President Trump’s businesses, bringing the investigation closer to the president. […] The Trump Organization has said that it never had real estate holdings in Russia, but witnesses recently interviewed by Mr. Mueller have been asked about a possible real estate deal in Moscow. In 2015, a longtime business associate of Mr. Trump’s emailed Mr. Trump’s lawyer Michael Cohen at his Trump Organization account claiming he had ties to President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia and said that building a Trump Tower in Moscow would help Mr. Trump’s presidential campaign.

Radio host Rush Limbaugh theorized on his program Friday that one of Mueller’s true objectives is to financially destroy President Trump.

Partial transcript via Breitbart News:

And these requests, the subpoena for documents from the Trump Organization, I ask you again, what has that to do with the campaign and with collusion and with the Russians? They’ve already been looking into Trump business in Russia with the Miss, what is it, USA, whatever his pageant is.

Do you all remember during the early days of the campaign there was news that Trump, in a tax return something like 20 years ago, took a $900 million deduction that was granted and survived an audit by the IRS? Now, I forget the details. It had to do with losses that he had incurred in that year in building things. It was around 900 or $920 million deduction. I’ll never forget when it was reported because most people will never come close to ever having that in a lifetime, and to have a guy personally write that much off?

Anyway, I think Mueller wants that $920 million back. I think Mueller wants to prove that that was a faulty deduction. I think that they want to go back, they want to get Trump’s tax returns because they want to nullify that $900 million deduction, and then they want to collect 20 years of interest and penalties and wipe Trump out.

In the meantime, President Trump’s lawyers are in the process of negotiating with special counsel Robert Mueller to bring the Russia probe to an end, reports Rebecca Ballhaus and Peter Nicholas of the Wall Street Journal.

Mueller’s tentacles continue to reach further and further.

CNN reported that investigators are attempting to determine whether former Blackwater chief Erik Prince misled the  House Intelligence Committee about a meeting he had in Seychelles in January of 2017.

Prince is accused of using the meeting as an opportunity to establish a secret back channel with Russia.

Fox News’ Catherine Herridge spoke with one of President Trump’s personal lawyers about the new subpoena request by Special Counsel Mueller.

According to Herridge, Trump’s lawyer was unaware of the subpoena and said it may be a ‘wrap up’ subpoena or ‘clean up’ subpoena which may signal the end of the investigation.


© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service