pfeiffer

White House senior adviser Dan Pfeiffer appears on CBS's "Face the Nation" in Washington on May 19, 2013. (AP Photo)

(CNSNews.com) - Introduced on ABC's "This Week" as "the strategist at the center of White House damage control," Dan Pfeiffer may have done additional damage in his appearance on the five Sunday talk shows.

Pfeiffer, struggling to address the IRS targeting of conservative groups, at one point told ABC's George Stephanopoulos, "The law is irrelevant."

Stephanopoulos asked Pfeiffer if President Obama believes it was illegal for IRS employees to single out conservative groups for extra scrutiny when those groups applied for special tax treatment.

- See more at: http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/obamas-point-man-law-irrelevant...

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/obamas-point-man-law-irrelevant

Views: 1051

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Irrelevant put on trial for treason and see if it is.

White House self indictment if I ever saw it.

The fraud and usurper barack hussein obama broke the law when he took the oath of office . The Supreme Court Justice that did the swearing in of this fraud and usurper barack hussein obama broke the law in 2009 and 2013.

The "law" is only relavent when it supports "their" agenda. A Country of Laws?  BS! Our "laws" are like "tools" on the vast shelves of the national warehouse. They just pick and choose which one is useful for the current issue and pull it down and apply it. The Supreme Court seems not to have any problem with this.

Well... That is what liberals believe. For years the word illegal has been ignored. Look where it has gotten us now.

All who know where the Liberals live stand up and shout out their addresses so all can be rounded up, what they are doing is illegal,they are not above the "Laws of USAmerica" they need to be prosecuted to the extent of our "Laws" so we can have some real justice for those of us who live on the outside of D.C.,take away their outrageous pay checks which they only work part time ...like 20 hours per week, they need to be there when Obummer is doing his illegal work and put his feet in "Hell's Fire" as they (Say Feet First "LOL". !!!

If they don't care about the law then why should we? Anarchy or Impeachment. Which will come first? Either we are a country of laws or not. Which is it?

No, Pfeifer, YOU and your slimy boss are irrelevant. Got that??

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service