White House senior adviser Dan Pfeiffer appears on CBS's "Face the Nation" in Washington on May 19, 2013. (AP Photo)

( - Introduced on ABC's "This Week" as "the strategist at the center of White House damage control," Dan Pfeiffer may have done additional damage in his appearance on the five Sunday talk shows.

Pfeiffer, struggling to address the IRS targeting of conservative groups, at one point told ABC's George Stephanopoulos, "The law is irrelevant."

Stephanopoulos asked Pfeiffer if President Obama believes it was illegal for IRS employees to single out conservative groups for extra scrutiny when those groups applied for special tax treatment.

- See more at:

Views: 1051

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Point Man, let's set the Record straight Mr., The Law is very much Relevant! Just how damn far is your head up Obama's ass, You little Whore?

Uh ... what? This little twerp should be canned NOW1

He got his head shoved up his illegal in chief leader's ass so far his head is sticking out of Oblammama's mouth.

Yes, thank you for that response these front men need to be aware of "Our Laws" not Sharia laws,it won't

fly here in USamerica, not as long as we have people like you watching out for USAmerica, we do need to take USAmerica back from those in D.C. they are watching out for themselves, I've been saying this for sometime now they aren't worried about USAmericans, they will always be paid even if we oust them

unless we get them for "Treason" also through "Aiding & Abetting terrorists supplying the Syrian Rebels

with weapons and the Muslime Brotherhood" in Egypt with millions and weapons of war !!!  :(  :(  :(

Only one question. Does he still have a job? he should have been fired immediately.

On the contrary: Oblamea just gave him a promotion and a hefty pay raise. Oblamea's minions NEVER GET FIRED OR PROSECUTED FOR ANY CRIMES THEY COMMIT.

Our government has become IRRELEVANT! When the law maker and law enforcers do not follow the law and break the laws then there is no law. There is no government either only a fight to survive government Tyranny!

Do I hear "Red Dawn" approaching our shores don't forget we have terrorists already living here from

overseas, from Egypt, Syria,Libya,Iran and many others, they ahve already admitted that they are sending for 'Russian Troops" for security purposes as they call it, "The White House Trojan Horses".

If they were merely irrelevant, we could ignore them. So let me propose that they are criminal and deserving of the punishment for criminals, depending upon which laws they have broken, of which treason is but one.

"You don't really mean the law is irrelevant, do you?" Stephanopoulos asked Pfeiffer.

"What I mean is that, whether it's legal or illegal is not important to the fact that the conduct doesn't matter. The Department of Justice has said they're looking into the legality of this....

Yeah ... I've heard that "... looking into that" before. That is just another Obama stall when the administration is doing everything it can to destroy our nation.

"looking into it" means it is in the trash can.




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service