Nancy Pelosi At AIPAC 2019 — Anti-Semitic Is Anti-American

It’ll be great if they completely self destruct and end up devouring each other.

Democrat internal polling must be horrendous for Rep. Nancy Pelosi to openly call out Rep. Ilhan Omar like that without mentioning her name. It’s almost what she did over a week ago when they made that broad statement against hate speech.

I think another reason why Pelosi and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer gave pro-Israel speeches is that President Trump called out the Democratic Party as anti-Israel coupled with major 2020 Democratic candidates skipping the conference, it looked bad.

Related: Hoyer To Tlaib, Omar and AOC — “We’ve Got 62 New Members. Not three”

You can’t fix a problem until you acknowledge it’s existence and Omar and her Marxist Caucus will continue to grow in power until they are too big to be stopped.

When you truly don’t stand for something you can’t defend it. You can’t change your stance on an issue without people noticing. And Nancy, these days, people notice everything. Your Democratic party has become the party of anti-semitism, anti-American, anti-laws/constitution. There’s no way of getting around it or covering it up.

What you did in the video below is a feel-good moment, but it will be forgotten before next Wednesday.

Without mentioning her by name, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) took a swing at fellow House Democrat Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) for her recent string of anti-Semitic comments, declaring at AIPAC on Tuesday that “to be anti-Semitic is to be anti-American.”

Since being sworn in as a member of the House earlier this year, Omar has found herself at the center of two different anti-Semitic controversies, the last of which caused the House to condemn Omar for suggesting that Jewish Americans have “dual loyalty.”

“In our Democratic societies, we should welcome legitimate debate on how best to honor our values and to advance our priorities without questioning loyalty or patriotism,” Pelosi said. “This month, the full House came together to condemn the anti-Semitic myth of dual loyalty and all forms of bigotry.”

[…]

“I simply declare: to be anti-Semitic is to be anti-American. It has no place in our country,” Pelosi said.

So how is what Pelosi said different from what Judge Jeanine Pirro said? It sounds like they both believe Omar’s fidelity to our constitution is highly questionable.

Talk is pretty cheap Nancy, and as everyone knows, actions speak much louder than words, but we don’t see much in the way of action from you. It’s almost as though you are scared of your members. Just saying.

Omar responded later in the day claiming that the BDS movement was an exercise of free speech.

“A condemnation for people that want to exercise their First Amendment rights is beneath any leader, and I hope that we find a better use of language when we are trying to speak as members of Congress that are sworn to protect the Constitution,” Omar said. [excerpt via Free Beacon]

I think what would satisfy a lot of Americans is that Omar should lose her security clearance by having it revoked. Then she will not be able to serve on these critical committees and can sit on the sidelines until she can love this country.

Omar is factually incorrect when she says, “A condemnation for people that want to exercise their First Amendment rights is beneath any leader.”

There’s an important difference between condemning a particular position and attempting to outlaw a particular position, and Omar is attempting to conflate the two to disarm her opposition. But Nancy is just as free to express her condemnation of Omar’s position as Omar is to express her opinion in the first place; both of these are simple acts of free speech.

This story originally appeared - https://www.waynedupree.com/pelosi-anti-semitic-is-anti-american/

Views: 25

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Nancy Pelosia a European Descendant, she is Anti-Semitic against Christian Jews, Goys, thats none Jews, and she is a IDIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

see this TPCC link below, share that blog with your friends, they will trip out.

http://teapartyorg.ning.com/forum/topics/dems-introduce-bill-forcin...

She is Jewish, and from the EU...LMAO...at the whole system.

Nancy Pelosi and her kind created this Anti-Semitic, Jews that hate Jews. She needs to take her a*s back to the EU with all of her kind her in America, and out of my homeland of Israel.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service