Agree or Disagree!???

On his radio show on Friday, Fox News host Sean Hannity said House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH), along with the rest of the Republican leadership in the House, had to be replaced. 

"I do think leadership in the House needs to change," Hannity said. "I don't think John Boehner is equipped for the job. I don't think he has the stomach to negotiate. I don't think he has the ability to communicate the positive, solution-oriented vision for the country."

"How hard is it?" Hannity asked. "Why aren't these guys out there explaining what their vision is?"

.

Listen to the sound clip in this article! GREAT STUFF!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/10/11/Hannity-Boehner-...

Views: 1218

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I'm glad to hear Sean finally speaking out about Boehner.

 I agree Sean Hannity many times speaks out Both sides of his mouth. He talks tuff but entertains may pretenders on His show. Thus causing confusion to the low information voter.No Romney no Rove been there done that.

I don't think he speaks on both sides of his mouth, but I know what you're saying.  He gives the RINO's a voice sometimes, instead of exposing them.  I know he tries to be fair, but sometimes he's just got to be bold.

Sean is right.......we need leaders in the House of Representatives to protect the interests of the American People and the United States of America.  John Boehner and Eric Cantor are not it.....THEY HAVE TO GO FOR THE GOOD OF THIS COUNTRY!

TOTALLY AGREE GET RID OF ALL OF THEM, THEY ARE NOOOOOOOOOO LEADERS PAID FOR BY THE CORPORATION OF DC!

There comes a time when change must come and come quickly. The top must be replaced. They will sell us down the road. They I think are afraid of Obama. Why

obama's color.

obama's "religion"..evilness...backers....they sold their souls to satan long ago!

Dump the Lump...

No guts, no glory...

obama attended 'occidental college' under a "fullbright scholarship". which is for "foreign nationals".!!

obama was and is an INDONESIAN citizen. that is why obama paid two million with his first executive order

to close his college records.

old sarge,'nam vet,'68,'70

lrrp/abn

ditto Pal

He failed. His grade school report cards are on EBay with the current bid at $587

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Steve Kelley

Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

OMG!!! Ruth Bader Ginsburg Voted Best Real-Life Hero At MTV Awards

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Monday was crowned the best real-life hero at the MTV Movie & TV Awards.

The 86-year old judge — whose 2015 biopic The Notorious RBG help cement her as a cultural icon among Liberals — beat out tennis star Serena Williams, WWE wrestler Roman Reigns, and comedian Hannah Gadsby to take him the award.

Though it wasn’t a clean sweep for Ginsburg last night.

The RGB documentary lost the “Best Fight” category for “Ruth Bader Ginsburg vs. Inequality” to “Captain Marvel vs. Minn-Erva.”

The justice was absent from the ceremony in Santa Monica, California.

Last December, Ginsburg had surgery to remove cancerous growths on her left lung. She was released from the hospital in New York four days later and recuperated at home.

Earlier this year, Ginsburg missed three days of arguments, the first time that’s happened since she joined the court in 1993. Still, she was allowed to participate using court briefs and transcripts.

Ginsburg has had two previous bouts with cancer, in 1999 and 10 years later.

Flashback: Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Pregnant Woman Is Not A ‘Mother’

Celebrated liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in an opinion released Tuesday that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.”

“[A] woman who exercises her constitutionally protected right to terminate a pregnancy is not a ‘mother’,” Ginsburg wrote in a footnote, which in turn responded to another footnote in the 20-page concurring opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas in the Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. case.

As Breitbart News’ legal editor Ken Klukowski reported, the case concerned a law signed by then-Governor (now Vice President) Mike Pence of Indiana in 2016, which required that the remains of an aborted fetus (or baby) be disposed of by cremation or burial. The law also prohibited abortion on the basis of sex, race, or disability alone.

The Court upheld the first part of the law, but declined to consider the selective-abortion ban until more appellate courts had ruled on it.

In his lengthy opinion — which delighted pro-life advocates, and distressed pro-choice activists — Thomas wrote that “this law and other laws like it promote a State’s compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics.” He traced the racist and eugenicist beliefs of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, and warned that the Court would one day need to wrestle with abortion as form of racial discrimination.

In a footnote, Thomas attacked Ginsberg’s dissenting opinion, which argued the Court should not have deferred to the legal standard used by the litigants in the lower courts, but should have subjected the Indiana law to a more difficult standard instead, since it impacted “the right of [a] woman” to an abortion.

Ginsburg cited no legal authority for her claim that a pregnant woman is not a “mother.” The claim that a fetus is not a child is central to pro-choice arguments.

SPECIAL VIDEOS

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service