Bill Kristol Says ‘Lazy’ White Working Class Should Be Replaced By ‘New Americans’

Bill Kristol (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Weekly Standard editor-at-large Bill Kristol said Tuesday afternoon that the white working class should be replaced by immigrants as they have become “decadent, lazy” and “spoiled.”

“Look, to be totally honest, if things are so bad as you say with the white working class, don’t you want to get new Americans in?” Kristol told author Charles Murray during an event hosted by the American Enterprise Institute titled “It Came Apart: What’s Next for a Fractured Culture.” Murray recently wrote a book, entitled “Coming Apart,” which focuses on the cultural separation between the wealthiest and most educated white Americans and the poorest and least educated white Americans.

Before delving into his theory about replacing the white working class, Kristol said that he hopes “this thing isn’t being videotaped or ever shown anywhere. Whatever tiny, pathetic future I have is going to totally collapse.”

The event was filmed by AEI, but as of press time is marked “unlisted” on the think tank’s YouTube channel, so that it doesn’t come up in search results.

“You can make a case that America has been great because every — I think John Adams said this — basically if you are in free society, a capitalist society, after two or three generations of hard work everyone becomes kind of decadent, lazy, spoiled — whatever,” Kristol said.

“Then, luckily, you have these waves of people coming in from Italy, Ireland, Russia, and now Mexico, who really want to work hard and really want to succeed and really want their kids to live better lives than them and aren’t sort of clipping coupons or hoping that they can hang on and meanwhile grew up as spoiled kids and so forth. In that respect, I don’t know how this moment is that different from the early 20th century,” he added.

WATCH:

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2017/02/08/bill-kristol-says-lazy-white-work...

Views: 767

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

billy is so full of crap...i stopped following him a long time ago. 

billy boy is right, except it is the lazy clowns like him that sit back and spew trash that must be replaced 

then all so called hard working white should boycott the weakly standard

The fact that a large percentage of illegal alien Mexicans want to eventually take over political power in this country isn't mentioned? Most Mexicans new to the US look upon Americans as interlopers upon stolen Mexican lands. Just ask them?

Great points as anyone who knows about La Raza & the Reconquista movement knows to be true.  The traitors in government also know you are speaking the truth but they don't give a damn. All they want is to hold on to the illicit power and wealth they have stolen from Americans.

You are right but there is a problem..........they will be fighting the muslims for control and guess who would win.   I say would, because, hopefully, us real Americans, white, black and latino,will put a stop to all who want to overtake our government.  Those who love America are out there, we just need to stay together and we are going to have to fight.

People like Kristol as well as other elitists are the problem in this country, If the were reduced to middle class status they would not be able to survive. What a putrid animal he is.

It is soooo refreshing to have Billy tell us that while  we work 3 jobs,  because Obumocare  lost us our 40  hour week,  we are lazy.   While we get   side jobs to help us out,  we are called undesireables.   Our kids cannot get  jobs in fast food restrarants  because these businesses cannot pay someone coming into the work force $15 a hour.   Our Schools are teaching a dz languages    none of them well.   The teaching  profession it seems is to dumb down  our youth.   But while you,   Billy,   swill your scotch in your quiet library with your other swells,   we try to run our businesses.   Do our jobs.   Raise our kids with having to send them to lousy schools with brain dead teachers.     Fined by the Feds because your hogs gave birth to 8 piglets not 6....        What really needs to go are tooo lmany govt employees who do not know HOW TO WORK. 

Slap the shit out of him.

So how are you different from the intolerant violent Left?

If your so good at recognizing the problems Roberto, give us the solution.

Phil is not for violence... as the primary tool for government reform.  He reluctantly takes up the sword. 

However, the left's entire premise for government transformation... relies on violence.  Violence is a key element in their policy to invoke revolution.  That is a very big difference... Philp reluctantly takes up the sword in defense of liberty and as the last resort... where as, the left willingly engages violence as principal part of their ideology... violence is the lefts key to revolution and transformation.

There is a big difference between Phil's use of violence to defend liberty and that of the lefts engagement of violence as a matter of ideology and practice... to create revolution.

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service