Bill Clinton Says Rape Of Juanita Broaddrick Was ‘Acceptable’ In 1978


Bill Clinton justifies rape of Juanita Broaddrick, saying it was acceptable in 1978

 Bill Clinton claims the brutal rape of Juanita Broaddrick was “acceptable” when he did it in 1978 because societal norms were different back then.

Speaking with PBS last Friday, Clinton shocked viewers by dismissing his devious behavior, including the sexual assault and rape of former colleagues.

Clinton told the PBS host that he believes things that would have been acceptable in regards to sexual consent when he was in office are now considered to be disqualifying.

Juanita Broaddrick immediately hit back at Mr. Clinton’s assertion that norms have “changed” on what you can do to someone without their consent.

Juanita Broaddrick @atensnut

Sooooo....Bill Clinton thinks he should get a pass because it was 1978 when HE RAPED ME....and HE knows it’s not acceptable in today’s society???: https://twitter.com/atensnut/status/1006273442352631808?ref_src=tws...

Dailycaller.com reports: “I think it’s a good thing that we should all have higher standards,” Clinton said. “I think the norms have really changed in terms of, what you can do to somebody against their will, how much you can crowd their space, make them miserable at work.”

Broaddrick, who accuses Clinton of raping her in 1978 when he was running for governor of Arkansas, tweeted about Clinton’s statement on Monday.

“Bill Clinton thinks he should get a pass because it was 1978 when HE RAPED ME,” she wrote. “and HE knows it’s not acceptable in today’s society?

https://yournewswire.com/bill-clinton-rape-juanita-broaddrick-accep...

Views: 23

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

 Now, what can a person say?

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by Jerry Holbert

Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

ALERT ALERT

CRIME!! -> Clinton Nightmare! Chief Financial Officer Of Clinton Foundation Turns Government Informant On Crime Family

Donations to the Clinton Foundation plummeted by 90% over a three-year period since Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 election to President Donald Trump.

But that may be the least of the her worries.

John Solomon from The Hill dropped another bombshell that will keep the Clintons up at night.

The former Chief Financial Officer of the Clinton Foundation has turned on the crime family and is now working as a government informant.

This could spell doom for the Clinton Crime Family.

American Thinker reported:

John Solomon of The Hill reveals the story that has been percolating for a long time but kept tightly under wraps – because that is what serious prosecutors do, especially when grand juries are poring over evidence and issuing indictments that remain sealed until the right moment comes. The trigger for the story coming out now probably is a House subcommittee hearing scheduled next week by Mark Meadows, chair of the House Freedom Caucus, while the GOP still can set the agenda of House hearings.

[A] GOP-led congressional subcommittee, led by Rep. Mark Meadows (N.C.), is planning to hold a hearing next week to review the work of John Huber, the special U.S attorney named a year ago to investigate all things Clinton.

It turns out that whistleblowers inside and outside the Clinton Foundation have amassed “6,000 pages of evidence attached to a whistleblower submission filed secretly more than a year ago with the IRS and FBI.” Among that evidence can be found:

Those reviews flagged serious concerns about legal compliance, improper commingling of personal and charity business and “quid pro quo” promises made to donors while Hillary Clinton was secretary of State.

The submission also cites an interview its investigators conducted with Andrew Kessel that quotes the foundation’s longtime chief financial officer as saying he was unable to stop former President Clinton from “commingling” personal business and charitable activities inside the foundation and that he “knows where all the bodies are buried.”

Their own investigation! That’s hard to put down as politically motivated.

Having the chief financial officer of the Clinton Foundation turn informant is a nightmare for the Clintons. The CFO has to process all the cash, and because that person usually is on the hook for any criminal violations, there is ample incentive to turn state’s evidence.

That evidence was assembled by a private firm called MDA Analytics LLC, run by accomplished ex-federal criminal investigators, who alleged the Clinton Foundation engaged in illegal activities and may be liable for millions of dollars in delinquent taxes and penalties.

In addition to the IRS, the firm’s partners have had contact with prosecutors in the main Justice Department in Washington and FBI agents in Little Rock, Ark.

© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service