Apocalyptic George Will: If Trump wins the nomination, prepare for the end of the conservative party

If you look beyond Donald Trump’s comprehensive unpleasantness — is there a disagreeable human trait he does not have? — you might see this: He is a fundamentally sad figure. His compulsive boasting is evidence of insecurity. His unassuageable neediness suggests an aching hunger for others’ approval to ratify his self-admiration. His incessant announcements of his self-esteem indicate that he is not self-persuaded. Now, panting with a puppy’s insatiable eagerness to be petted, Trump has reveled in the approval of Vladimir Putin, murderer and war criminal.

Putin slyly stirred America’s politics by saying Trump is “very . . . talented,” adding that he welcomed Trump’s promise of “closer, deeper relations,” whatever that might mean, with Russia. Trump announced himself flattered to be “so nicely complimented” by a “highly respected” man: “When people call you brilliant, it’s always good.” When MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough said Putin “kills journalists, political opponents and invades countries,” Trump replied that “at least he’s a leader.” Besides, Trump breezily asserted, “I think our country does plenty of killing also.” Two days later, Trump, who rarely feigns judiciousness, said: “It has not been proven that he’s killed reporters.”

Well. Perhaps the 56 journalists murdered were coincidental victims of amazingly random violence that the former KGB operative’s police state is powerless to stop. It has, however, been “proven,” perhaps even to Trump’s exacting standards, that Putin has dismembered Ukraine. (Counts one and two at the 1946 Nuremberg trials concerned conspiracy to wage, and waging, aggressive war.)

Until now, Trump’s ever-more-exotic effusions have had an almost numbing effect. Almost. But by his embrace of Putin, and by postulating a slanderous moral equivalence — Putin kills journalists, the United States kills terrorists, what’s the big deal, or the difference? — Trump has forced conservatives to recognize their immediate priority.

read more:


Views: 1041

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

the conservatives did not do much when they got there now they are selling us to obama.

And I no longer call them conservatives.....I call them traitors

I suggest George wil look at king o and minions and billary and the RINOS...oh he is one..I get it....before he knocks us Americans who get what Trump is saying!

Cult Trumptards are claiming conservative, claiming tea party affiliation and yet being led by the blow hard, Jim Jones of this years pres. candidates these alleged consveratives and tea party folks are drinking the foul mouth, classless proven progressive liberal as if they were on the Obama Cult bandwagon of 2008 and 2012, oopsie JUST LIKE THEIR CHOSEN FOOL DONALD TRUMP.  me thinks we had a lot of Obama voters in 2008 and 2012, because there is no other explanation in the world for why they would be drinking this man's kool aid.  And you are putting the future supreme court judge picks in this man's hand DEAR LORD what cliff have you all fallen off of.  p.s. no fan of
George Wills after all he is the moderate of the establishment big time.  But he is right here if conservatives who allegedly espouse PRINCIPLES that are conservative are supporting Donald trump I want NO PART OF THAT CONSERVATIVE PARTY OR TEA PARTY, just as I have no use for the establishment Republican party, because it will be nothing other than a FRAUD.

Then, who do you support?

That and his wife worry me greatly.

His wife has us all worried.  She (and her father) has been so open and active with the OWG agenda, and from some reports, so has Cruz himself.  YES, we are all worried about that, and the fact that DC is not against Cruz at all so it seems, but  only against Trump the truth speaker.

But let's keep vetting them all folks, this is how things get exposed and that is what we need - EXPOSURE !

WE are lucky with Trump since his life all along has been an open book.  But the others have secrets.


Now had Cruz's father obtained his American citizenship ( no one knows if he did or didn't) when he was 18 and escaped to Texas, he'd have made his son a NBC.  That one paper would have made all the difference in the world because the parents only need to be CITIZENS, not NBC.   Parents need to be CITIZENS  when the child is born, but they do not need to be NBC themselves.

I believe this would make Jindal a NBC since both  of his India born parents came here and became citizens early on.  And he was born here, right in our South in Louisiana. Jindal has been there all his life.

Surely Bobby Jindal is born a citizen, but is that defined as "natural-born"? The offspring of "resident" foriegn nationals is a "resident" foriegn national as well. Did Jindals' folks arrive as: resident, naturalized citizen (yet not born here), or natural-born citizen? There is a differance of three conditions here (and potentially a fourth if both parents must be natural-born for the offspring to be the same).

Perhaps the answer is that both parents must be at least naturalized citizens for their child to be a natural born citizen.

This would mean that if Obama's father never attained naturalized status, Obama would be indeed ineligible (I never thought I would say it, but....)

The Constitution does not say parents need to be NBC, just CITIZENS and does not delegate HOW they are to become CITIZENS.  I believe Jindals folks became naturalized citizens the usual way most do. They planned on living here for life and they have.

OKAY! But, LBF (hope you don't mind, but its easier to type), do both folks need to be at least naturalized citizens? The notion that this eliminates conflicts of affiliation for the child to absorb, makes sense (think Obama). Otherwise, anyone could easily make the case (AND SOME WOULD), that just being born on american soil from any parents self-sufficiently constitutes loyalty to this nations interests, and must be assumed. The founders stipulation about citizenship regarding elected federal political office clearly indicates they were wary of this presumption.





Political Cartoons by Chip BokPolitical Cartoons by Gary Varvel

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Joe Biden Vows: Give Taxpayer-Funded Obamacare To All Illegal Aliens In U.S.

Former Vice President and 2020 Democrat presidential primary candidate Joe Biden is vowing to give Obamacare, funded by American taxpayers, to all 11 to 22 million illegal aliens living in the United States.

During an interview with Telemundo’s Jose Diaz-Balart, Biden forgot that Obamacare technically bans illegal aliens from enrolling in healthcare plans — although illegal aliens are still able to obtain subsidized and free healthcare at Americans’ expense — and promised that under his plan, all 11 to 22 million illegal aliens would be able to get Obamacare.

The exchange went as follows:

DIAZ-BALART: When I … NBC moderated that first debate with you, I didn’t … I don’t recall a clear answer, under your plan should … would the 11, 12 million undocumented immigrants that live in the United States, that have been here many for generations, would they have access …


DIAZ-BALART: — to health insurance.

BIDEN: Yes, they … if they can buy into the system like everybody else.

DIAZ-BALART: Because you know, in [Obamacare] they can’t.

BIDEN: Yeah. Yeah, I know. Well they can, that’s my point. They continue to be able to do that.

DIAN-BALART: They cannot under the ObamaCare.

BIDEN: Well and that’s my point, they will though. They will be able to buy into … [illegal aliens] would be able to buy in, just like anyone else could.

Biden joins Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), and South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg — among other 2020 Democrats — in committing to forcing American taxpayers to pay for healthcare for illegal aliens who arrive in the U.S.

Already, due to loopholes, American taxpayers are spending nearly $20 billion every year to provide illegal aliens with subsidized healthcare, emergency room visits, and other health services.

Under the 2020 Democrats’ plan to provide taxpayer-funded healthcare to all illegal aliens living in the U.S., Americans would be billed potentially $660 billion every decade just to cover the costs. Other research has found that the plan would cost Americans at least $23 billion every year.

As Breitbart News has reported, experts have said that giving taxpayer-funded healthcare to effectively all foreign nationals who can make it to America’s borders would drive “strong incentives for people with serious health problems to enter the country or remain longer than their visas allow in order to get government-funded care.”

Despite 2020 Democrats’ continued push for taxpayer-funded healthcare for illegal aliens, American voters are overwhelmingly opposed to the plan. The latest Wall Street Journal/NBC News survey revealed that the healthcare-for-illegal-aliens plan is the least popular policy position, with opposition from 62 percent of U.S. voters.

Similarly, a CNN poll from July discovered that 63 percent of likely swing voters oppose providing healthcare to illegal aliens, along with nearly 6-in-10 of all likely U.S. voters and 61 percent of moderates. A Rasmussen Reports survey also found that likely voters, by a majority of 55 percent, oppose giving healthcare to even the most low-income illegal aliens.

Infantilization of Popular Culture

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service