5 arrested for allegedly trying to blow up Ohio bridge

Five people described as anarchists were arrested Monday in a Cleveland-area park for trying to blow up a bridge, sources tell Fox News.

The public was never in danger from the explosive devices, which were inoperable and controlled by an undercover FBI employee, according to sources close to the investigation.

A criminal complaint was filed Tuesday morning in U.S. District Court in Cleveland, according to an FBI press release.

Court documents say three of the suspects are self-proclaimed anarchists who formed a small group and considered a series of plots over several months.

According to the complaint, the suspects initially planned to use smoke grenades to distract law enforcement so that they could topple financial institution signs atop high rise buildings in Cleveland. However, the plot later called for the use of C-4 explosives, authorities said.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/05/01/5-arrested-for-allegedly-tryin...

Views: 413

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

My first impression is what a crock more cia disinformation

Sounds like home-grown Occupy Wall Street terrorists.

Darla links are no good

another FBI sponsored attack ? Are they really doing their  job or trying to form public opinion ?

Pretty close to my thoughts--"FBI had control of the device."  Then who the heck was responsible for this?  The FBI?  Or was this indeed a home-grown group, then we need to know if the FBI was pulling an illegal group infiltration? 

I'm getting more and more suspicious of our entire govt. with every passing day.  I'm not a "conspiracy theorist"...I still think the 9/11 conspiracy advocates are a bunch of nuts, but the govt's actions as of late have REALLY started me thinking about overall motives...I mean, how much more self-incriminating can our entire govt get? 

"Fast-and-Furious" anyone?

by public opinion, It establishes domestic terrorism, and allows the government to "declare war on them"  the American people, or whomever they declare a terrorist. Public opinion would be the enabler.  WE THE PEOPLE are not the enemy.


May I direct you to the following sites that should change your mind about the attacks of 9/11.

Firefighters For 9/11 Truth. Here you will hear and see testimony from the firefighters that were there that day in real-time news casts. As well as victims stating of the many secondary explosions, some of which occurred in the basements of the WTC buildings BEFORE any planes hit.

A&E Fro 9/11 Truth. Here you will find nearly 1,700 of the top architects and engineers in the world testifying to the impossibility of the governments claims of how those buildings came down.

Pilots For 9/11 Truth. Here you will find thousands of professional pilots that will discount the governments version of 9/11.

Patriots for 9/11 Truth. Literally hundreds of former politicians, military, intelligence agents, law enforcement, scientists ans scholars testifying to 9/11 being an inside job. 

I realize it's disturbing to consider the possibility that elements within our government and media planned, executed and continue to cover-up the crime of 9/11, but it would be even more disturbing to leave these murders in power.

if these things are true, then the truth must be made known. I however can not believe a sitting president would or could orchestrate such an act, but that does leave alot of room for others to operate in, ultilizing agency resources.


Presidents, for the most part are nothing more than mid-level managers. The real power resides behind the scenes, with the military brass, corporate CEO's in the MIC, and most importantly the Central Banks.

Bush couldn't orchestrate himself out of a paper bag. Obama without a teleprompter would chew his own tongue.  

I aint agruing with you, but a telepromter black out would be interesting, if not funny to wittness.

Knowing what I know about the lies spewed by both our government and media my first instinct is to suspect that this is a provocateur inspired incident. 

It's a sad situation when you have to hope that this is what is being reported is true, as opposed to the thought that your own government provokes these events. But history proves that 90% of the terrorist attacks are indeed state sponsored. And that includes the attacks of 9/11. Which I absolutely believe to be an inside job.

 obama employees, perhaps?




Political Cartoons by AF BrancoPolitical Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Angry Dem Impeachment ‘Witness’: Pam Karlan Donated Thousands To Hillary And Was On Clinton’s List For Potential SCOTUS Nomination

Image result for Pam Karlan

The House Judiciary Committee, chaired by Rep. Jerrold Nadler, kicked off its first impeachment circus Wednesday morning.

The four ‘witnesses’ testifying have never actually witnessed any of Trump’s dealings with Ukraine firsthand — the four witnesses are law professors offering legal analysis.

One of the witnesses the Dems rolled out is an angry Hillary Clinton donor who was on Crooked’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

No wonder why this unhinged, dowdy woman is so pissed off!

“Professor Pam Karlan donated thousands of dollars to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination. So she certainly has no vendetta against President Trump,” GOP Rep. Mark Walker said.

Congressman Walker also pointed out that Noah Feldman, the Dems first partisan witness in Wednesday’s hearing tweeted about impeaching Trump right after he was sworn in.

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker

Meet Noah Feldman, House Democrats first partisan witness.

Look at the date of this tweet. He has been trying to get @realDonaldTrump impeached since 46 days into his presidency.

His reason? Trump criticized President Obama.

This is a sham impeachment with sham witnesses. https://twitter.com/NoahRFeldman/status/839185127494254592 

Noah Feldman @NoahRFeldman

Trump's wiretap tweets raise risk of impeachment http://bv.ms/2mY1ueX  via @BV

Rep. Mark Walker   RepMarkWalker

The next witness, Karlan, has donated thousands to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination.

So she certainly has no vendetta against @realDonaldTrump.

These witnesses are as serious as House Democrats impeachment case: not at all.

The entire sham show trial is stacked with partisan hacks who have wanted to impeach Trump from the moment he won in November of 2016.

Norm Eisen, the Democrats’ counsel who is blasting Trump and questioning witnesses in Wednesday’s show trial, tweeted about impeaching Trump before Donald Trump was even sworn into office!

Infantilization of Popular Culture

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service