Dale E. Martin's Discussions (166)

Discussions Replied To (166) Replies Latest Activity

ADMIN

"I have not watched their stupid participation trophy award crap for the last 40 year…"

Dale E. Martin replied Feb 12, 2017 to Grammys producer wants stars to be political during speeches

50 Feb 14, 2017
Reply by Frankmusic

ADMIN

"Intresting concept. I wonder if she starts singing like a canary if shes comes to a…"

Dale E. Martin replied Feb 11, 2017 to WOW! Corrupt Florida Democrat Corrine Brown Faces 357 YEARS IN PRISON

98 Mar 31, 2017
Reply by Marilyn Calkins

"I have never ever bought a Starbucks coffee. All that fancy crap is just that, fancy…"

Dale E. Martin replied Jan 30, 2017 to Starbucks Has a Response to President Trump’s Immigration Ban: Hire 10,000 Refugees

57 Feb 3, 2017
Reply by Arron Armand Grottolo

ADMIN

"I was thinking the same thing. Cough on me and my food = landing on your ass."

Dale E. Martin replied Jan 17, 2017 to Obamacare supporters cough on diners at Trump NYC hotel

38 Jan 18, 2017
Reply by Debra A Shawver

"As would I."

Dale E. Martin replied Jan 15, 2017 to Riot Stand Down: Obama to Fire National Guard Chief During Inauguration

98 Jan 24, 2017
Reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret)

"I have no problem with that."

Dale E. Martin replied Jan 15, 2017 to Riot Stand Down: Obama to Fire National Guard Chief During Inauguration

98 Jan 24, 2017
Reply by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret)

"He's a piece of white trash. Ship his butt to Russia (they have an Interpol warrent)…"

Dale E. Martin replied Jan 13, 2017 to BREAKING – George Soros HACKED, Revelations Point Straight to The Supreme Court

38 Jan 15, 2017
Reply by Thomas

ADMIN

"But, but I thought that the employment picture was all so rosey! Well I guess the pa…"

Dale E. Martin replied Jan 10, 2017 to ‘There Are No Jobs’: Obama Loyalists Scramble To Find Work

41 Jan 11, 2017
Reply by Ruth Webster

ADMIN

"Totally agree with that accessment. There are a lot of people in DC that need to be…"

Dale E. Martin replied Jan 6, 2017 to No US carriers were at sea for the past week. That hasn't happened since World War II

30 Jan 8, 2017
Reply by Jea9

ADMIN

"I totally concur with your statement. The Democrats are going to learn a valuable le…"

Dale E. Martin replied Jan 6, 2017 to Senate rejects effort to force 60 votes for Obamacare repeal

23 Jan 11, 2017
Reply by arthur

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service