bobbie murphy's Discussions (245)

Discussions Replied To (244) Replies Latest Activity

ADMIN

"HEY PEOPLE ILLEGAL IS NOT A SICK BIRD IT IS ILLEGAL MEANING NOT LEGAL LIKE STEALING…"

bobbie murphy replied Mar 2, 2017 to Illegal Immigrant Speaks Out At Press Conference About Being Illegal, Then Is Promptly Detained By ICE

54 Mar 5, 2017
Reply by Sally Gangi

ADMIN

"SUCH A STUPID PERSON HOW AND WHY DO PEOPLE VOTE FOR HER UGGGGG"

bobbie murphy replied Feb 23, 2017 to Democrat Maxine Waters Calls Trump Cabinet Picks: “A Bunch of Scumbags”

87 Apr 4, 2017
Reply by Marilyn Calkins

"AHOLE THEY ARE BREAKING THE LAW NOT BEING LEGAL DO YOU KNOW THAT WORD LAWYER "

bobbie murphy replied Feb 19, 2017 to Released -Daniel Ramirez’s lawyer: Illegal immigrants have constitutional rights under Obama amnesty -Evidence gang ties

87 Mar 30, 2017
Reply by Jea9

"P,S, GOD BLESS PRESIDENT TRUMP "

bobbie murphy replied Feb 9, 2017 to ‘The Future Is Female’: Hillary Clinton’s First Post-Election Statement Reminds Us Why She Lost

23 Feb 12, 2017
Reply by Bobbi Martin

"LOVE ALL YOUR COMMENTS LAUGHED AT COUPLE AND THANK GOD FOR THE MALES IN THIS COUNTRY…"

bobbie murphy replied Feb 9, 2017 to ‘The Future Is Female’: Hillary Clinton’s First Post-Election Statement Reminds Us Why She Lost

23 Feb 12, 2017
Reply by Bobbi Martin

"COULD YOU IMAGINE IF SHE WON ?? "

bobbie murphy replied Feb 9, 2017 to ‘The Future Is Female’: Hillary Clinton’s First Post-Election Statement Reminds Us Why She Lost

23 Feb 12, 2017
Reply by Bobbi Martin

ADMIN

"ALL THE MYSTERIOUS DEATHS UNDER CLINTON AND OBAMAS WATCH THEY HAVE THE NERVE TO BLAM…"

bobbie murphy replied Feb 7, 2017 to MSNBC’s Tur Suggests Trump Will Be Responsible for ‘Suspicious Deaths’ of Journalists

38 Feb 11, 2017
Reply by Randal W. Howard

"GET HIS ASS IN JAIL ASAP"

bobbie murphy replied Feb 3, 2017 to New White House Petition: ‘Issue an International Arrest Warrant for George Soros’

28 Feb 7, 2017
Reply by John Barr

ADMIN

"i hope so "

bobbie murphy replied Jan 29, 2017 to WOW! Dartmouth College Gets Surprise Visit From Rolling Thunder When Student Announces Plan To Burn Flag

30 Jan 29, 2017
Reply by Philip D. Steenbergen

ADMIN

"I THINK HE IS GETTING MOST INPORTANT THINGS IN ORDER FIRST AND HE WILL LET THE OTHER…"

bobbie murphy replied Jan 29, 2017 to Question of the Day

55 Jan 30, 2017
Reply by Jo Gonzalez

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service