KLAUS HEINRICH's Discussions (183)

Discussions Replied To (183) Replies Latest Activity

"UNFORTUNATELY THE TEAPARTY DOES NOT 50 MILLION MEMBERS. MOST AMERICANS ARE IGNORANT…"

KLAUS HEINRICH replied Apr 26, 2016 to What Would You Be Willing To Do If The GOP Steals The Nomination?

6320 Aug 26, 2016
Reply by American 1st

ADMIN

"RAND, YOU ARE NOT A CHIP OFF THE OLD BLOCK. YOU HAD YOUR GOOD MOMENTS BUT SOMEHOW YO…"

KLAUS HEINRICH replied Jul 31, 2015 to Rand Paul attributes Trump's rise to a 'loss of sanity'

40 Aug 2, 2015
Reply by Robert William Metcalf

ADMIN

"CORRECTION MY FRIEND, HIS WIFE IS EMPLOYED BY GOLDMAN SACH. BASICALLY THE SAME CRIMI…"

KLAUS HEINRICH replied Jul 30, 2015 to POLLS: 'The Trump steamroller' continues to crush GOP rivals — even in their own states

59 Aug 1, 2015
Reply by forrest jane cline

ADMIN

"WHILE SOME OF WHAT YOU WRITE IS TRUE TELL ME WHAT EXPERIENCE DID OUR PPRESENT HOMOSE…"

KLAUS HEINRICH replied Jul 30, 2015 to POLLS: 'The Trump steamroller' continues to crush GOP rivals — even in their own states

59 Aug 1, 2015
Reply by forrest jane cline

ADMIN

"  YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY CORRECT,  SHE AND OBAMA WERE WHISKED AWAY FOR ONE DAY TO CHANTI…"

KLAUS HEINRICH replied Apr 26, 2015 to Hillary summoned to May 18 public hearing

12 Apr 26, 2015
Reply by KLAUS HEINRICH

ADMIN

"WHAT DO YOU EXPECT TO ORIGINATE IN AN ALCOHOLIC BRAIN? HE NEEDS TO BE REPLACED AND T…"

KLAUS HEINRICH replied Apr 24, 2015 to BOEHNER: CLINTONS ARE 'GOOD PEOPLE'...

85 Apr 26, 2015
Reply by Mike Travis

"BECAUSE YOU NUT JOBS VOTE THEM IN. GET IT?"

KLAUS HEINRICH replied Apr 16, 2015 to A Major Muslim Group Just Made A Bold Move To Gain More Power In The US Government

32 Apr 18, 2015
Reply by matt mccleary

ADMIN

"SHE HAS TO GO THROUGH THE VETTING PROCESS. SO WE, THE PEOPLE, SHOULD FINALLY AND OFF…"

KLAUS HEINRICH replied Apr 13, 2015 to Let the Gaffes Begin: Hillary's Original Campaign Bio Said She 'Fought Children and Families'

18 Apr 15, 2015
Reply by Homer Chessman

ADMIN

" CHECK OUT HER SEX LIVE RIGHT HERE AND WORST OF ALL YOU PAID FOR IT. Hillary Raped M…"

KLAUS HEINRICH replied Mar 10, 2015 to Hillary Clinton: Using private email was ‘convenient,’ server to stay ‘private’

19 Mar 16, 2015
Reply by kathyet

"  I TOLD YOU 4 MONTH AGO THAT ISIS AND ISIL JUST LIKE AL QAIDA ARE CIA CREATED ENTI…"

KLAUS HEINRICH replied Mar 9, 2015 to Media Blackout after US ally becomes leader of ISIS in Libya

37 Mar 12, 2015
Reply by roy veteto

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service