Joseph T. Ward's Discussions (1,401)

Discussions Replied To (1398) Replies Latest Activity

ADMIN

"Oh hell yes Jack!  SEMPER FIDELIS"

Joseph T. Ward replied Jan 25, 2016 to Michelle Obama On Life At The White House: “I hate this place.”

80 Jan 27, 2016
Reply by William Bolton

ADMIN

"What did Obama say, LET MY PEOPLE GO."

Joseph T. Ward replied Jan 24, 2016 to Obama Admin Releases Al Qaeda Explosives Expert from Gitmo

11 Jan 24, 2016
Reply by Joseph T. Ward

ADMIN

"The disgrace is letting a abject moron experiment on the school children. "

Joseph T. Ward replied Jan 24, 2016 to Is Congress Finally About To Bring Michelle Obama’s AWFUL School Lunch Rules To An End?

21 Jan 24, 2016
Reply by Joseph T. Ward

ADMIN

"You would think these 'educators' would have a modicum of pride, at least enough to…"

Joseph T. Ward replied Jan 24, 2016 to Former Pearson Textbook Exec Reveals Anti-American Agenda in Common Core

17 Feb 6, 2016
Reply by peggy gilliam

ADMIN

"She also organized a hate the veteran movement in the 60s & 70s"

Joseph T. Ward replied Jan 21, 2016 to Jane Fonda Organizing 'Dump Trump' Campaign

69 Jan 24, 2016
Reply by Skip peters

"Roll up your sleeves Patriots, it's time to start cleaning up our cherished home.  S…"

Joseph T. Ward replied Jan 15, 2016 to Fox News Contributor Watches SOTU Address, Instantly Realizes What Obama REALLY Thinks of America

2 Jan 15, 2016
Reply by Joseph T. Ward

ADMIN

"I ain't gonna use my perfectly good hand on the garbage, how bout a stick with a nai…"

Joseph T. Ward replied Jan 11, 2016 to LIBS Lose Their Minds! Ted Cruz Says Hillary Is A Liar, His Daughter Is Spanked For Lying, SHE SHOULD BE TOO!

27 Jan 11, 2016
Reply by Joseph T. Ward

"NO, Muslims shouldn't have firearms, they have an atrocious record for shooting peop…"

Joseph T. Ward replied Jan 8, 2016 to Should Muslims Own Guns?

202 Jan 18, 2016
Reply by ivan scheu

ADMIN

"Right on al pambuena,  RIGHT ON."

Joseph T. Ward replied Jan 1, 2016 to New Year’s Surprise: Obama Regulation To Give Work-Permits To Foreign College-Graduates

24 Jan 5, 2016
Reply by martin smith lll

ADMIN

"Is "Leslie" falling asleep or is she too stupid to open her eyes when she's supposed…"

Joseph T. Ward replied Dec 30, 2015 to Radio Host Defends Trump: Hillary Enabled an ‘Unindicted Rapist’

26 Dec 30, 2015
Reply by Jo Gonzalez

RSS

LIGHTER SIDE

 

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco

ALERT ALERT

Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service