A legislative proposal in South Dakota’s House of Representatives seeks to give the state’s attorney general the authority to review presidential executive orders and possibly nullify those deemed unconstitutional.

“State Rep. Aaron Aylward (R-Harrisburg) introduced HB 1194, which is described as an act ‘to authorize the review of certain executive orders issued by the President of the United States,'” the Daily Wire reported Monday.

The process starts with a review by the Executive Council of the Legislative Research Board, then a referral from the Council sent to the state attorney general and the governor, according to KELO.

“Once the referral has been made, the attorney general may examine the order to determine whether the state can seek an exemption or declare it unconstitutional,” the report continued:

The proposed bill would also allow the attorney general to block implementation of any order deemed unconstitutional if the order refers to:

  • A pandemic or other public health emergency
  • The regulation of natural resources
  • The regulation of the agricultural industry
  • The regulation of land use
  • The regulation of the financial sector through the imposition of environmental, social, or governance standards
  • The regulation of the constitutional right to keep and bear arms

“This isn’t just a President [Joe] Biden issue but rather an overall executive overreach issue that we’ve been experiencing for a long time,” Aylward said.


read more here:

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Email me when people reply –


  • How about nullifying Beijing Biden the crook who sits in OUR Whte House against our laws? We should start there, and drag him out in chains if need be.

  • Anything I could do to HELP???  Someone PLEASE !!!!

  • So, I'm not sure if the States will be prepared for the federal government to halt all monies provided to them for various activities! 

    • I'm sure that the reply, "WELL, NO MORE COVID NONSENSE. WE ARE OPEN FOR BUSINESS" will catch the federal governments attention. It needs lip service support for this Federal medical farce to be sustained at any level.

    • Let the States become creative... let the states engage in coordinated anti-commandeering law...  for funds, let the States issue State Certificates or Notes (not currency), and shut down all but law enforcement, education, health, and first responder federal programs... Kill or drastically defund all non-essential Federal Programs environmental, EEO, and other social programs... let the Fed's choke on that. 

      State certificates and notes would operate more like Bonds... not a currency as they could not be used as payment for public debt... only as investments and for State Debts... taxes, fees for services to the state, etc. and in as a type of barter-exchange with other private companies or individuals willing to accept them.  Let the state guarantee payment of such certificates at dates certain in US Currency accrued thru taxes and impounds of federal revenues held in trust.

      Finally, let the State Legislatures pass payroll tax and excise tax laws that require all withholdings and excise taxes to be forwarded to the State Capitol... where the State's share can be withheld and any Federal share, remaining... forwarded at the end of each quarter.  Tell the Fed any enforcement actions against employers or others will result in the state deporting the agents involved, or prosecuting them for obstruction of justice and jailing them.

      Time to get tough at the State Level... in every Red State... these acts need to be coordinated and simultaneously implemented thus over loading the Federal Governments ability to respond effectively... any Federal Court orders to the contrary should be ignored and the Judges told that their orders (jurisdiction) end at the Federal Court House Steps...

    • I found a present to share with you if you have not seen it yet:

      What is the Lesser Magistrate Doctrine? - Defy Tyrants

      Enjoy (hopefully)

      What is the Lesser Magistrate Doctrine?
      <strong>The Lesser Magistrate Doctrine</strong> teaches that when the superior or higher ranking civil authority makes immoral/unjust laws or policie…
    • Exactly...  and part of that doctrine is the use of anti-commandeering tactics to stop federal overreach.

      However, the lesser magistrate doctrine requires the lesser magistrate to act... too, resist the superior magistrate. The States and the People need the fortitude to organize and resist the superior federal magistrate, should the superior magistrate show up with the force of arms needed to enforce his will upon the people.   The lesser magistrate must be willing to go to war with the superior magistrate, to defend his rights under the law.  That is the problem. The States and the people are operating as lesser magistrates and are unwilling to resist the superior magistrate's overreach.  

      The STATES are effectively agents of the Federal Government... they refuse to defend their rights and those of their people.  If they had a pair they'd be defending their borders and evicting federal agents who interfered with their right to secure their state from invasion.  or attempted to blockade it.

      If Ron DeSantis had a pair he would have told Pres. Biden that a ban on entering and leaving Florida would be seen as a BLOCKADE... an overt act of war levied on Florida by the Federal Government.  He should have informed the President that Flordia would respond appropriately to any act of war levied against it.  It is time Governors defend their State soverignty.

      Push has come to shove... the several States and their Citizens... the PEOPLE... are now left with one choice... too, either enforce the US Constitution as intended or submit to tyranny.  They must reign in their FEDERAL SERVANTS by using State and Public power, to restrain the overreach of the Federal Government.  CivilWar may need to begin if the President uses such draconian force as blockading a state to get it to accent federal mandates in the form of unconstitutional EO's.

  • This could be very effective if other states scrupulously do not network in plain view to nullify illegal federal domestic acts of the Biden adminstration. (it is interesting how a lot of Bidens current work is international themed E.O.s)

    If conspiracy to commit insurrection can be demonstrated, Bidens operators will have him attempting what Mr. Trump did not do, since no obvious conflict of personal interest (election) will discourage military or federal agency action. IMHO

    • Hey! Michael, do you think they are going to follow what you suggested? I don't think so because we are beyond that.

    • To avoid the hassel of a Biden adminstration eager to show just how much they are in charge of everything, YUP!

      Remember old "Fast and Furious" Eric Holders' reaction when Arizona declared it would enforce security on the southern border?

      He rode on down in his jet and loudly explained that border security was the Federal governments responsibilty to enforce (or to choose not to),

      and that border states would just have to suck it up or face criminal charges.

      So I would hope that states would avoid an opportunity for a Biden (really Obama) administration photo-op for fascism,

      and simply perform the nullification acts without overt co-ordination. Of course the Obama-ites really prefer the word, "collusion", don't they?

This reply was deleted.