Replies

    • Valerie,

      This is addressed to you because you have shown yourself to intelligent and capable of comprehension.

      Between you and I, we are very similar in age.   Country club set is laughable.   My father barely started high school  before I was on the way.   Followed very quickly by 3 more.   That did not make him stupid.   He obviously had high IQ and great working motivation in that we always had our needs met.   I should say he was on his own at 13, living in a room and stocking shelves to provide for himself.  Yet he became a multimillionaire, and multi business owner.   IF HE COULD DO IT, ANYONE COULD WHO CHOSE TO WORK HARD AND NEVER SPEND EVERY DIME THEY EARNED.   Failure was unacceptable.

      I went to work for the Army as the divorced mother of 2 teenage girls.  Started at GS2 for 2 weeks. And worked, competed to a GS13/14 step 9  in a little under 30 years.   Relocated 12 times.

      To the instant issue:  Remember back a year or 2 ago when there was a lot of interest in a Convention of the states?  Remember why interest faded"  The goal was a rewrite of Our Constitution.  Imagine the egos that actually believed they could rewrite a document that has stood the test of time for a couple hundred years.   

      Wiser people finally stepped up and reminded everyone that they would be opening a real can of worms with a lot of corrupt politicians just champing at the bit to make all sorts of changes to the document that MAKES AMERICA WHAT SHE IS.  Well, the wiser folks prevailed and commonsense won that round.

      Surely you've heard of BLM and ANTIFA.  And there are others as well with the same goal.  

      THAT GOAL:    The same as many corrupt politicians of both parties.    The fill my pocket bunch.THAT GOAL IS THE  ALINKSY GOAL PUSHED BY 0BLABLA, OVERLOAD THE SYSTEM TIL IT FAILS AND THEN START FROM SCRATCH  TO REBUILD IT THEIR  WAY.

      WELL,maybe you trust their 'doing it their way'.  I don't.  I've seen enough of their way to know that it is the way to failure.

      DO WE NEED CHANGES?  ABSOLUTELY

      DO WE REALLY WANT TO GO SOCIALIST/COMMUNIST?    I SURE AS HELL WOULD NOT WISH THAT ON ANYONE.   IT WOULD BE THE END OF THE USA.  

      WE ARE PERILOUSLY CLOSE TO THAT RIGHT NOW.

    • Again I don't see how anyone can disagree with what you are saying and I do apologize for mischaracterizing you.  I know nothing of you, or your background.  I stand corrected. On to the issue.  When the good Lt. Col says he wants to tear the system down, I don't think he intends to rewrite the constitutional.  I certainly don't.  I don't think any of us see the need to do anything like that, to go quite that far.  But there is an out of control tranche of bureaucracies that can and should be shaken up and, in some cases torn to the ground.  There's the DOJ  for example and FBI, the FISA courts and the intelligence services, all 17 of them that are out of control and byb that I mean specifically unaccountable to the proper authority of elected officials. 

      There's a Dept of Education that needs to be disbanded altogether and a Housing Department that has as it's mission subsidizing housing in substandard conditions for unbelieveable numbers of Americans, on and on.  These Bureaucracies form interagency conconsenus, which are often at odds with elected officials and, or official policy such as, most noteably President Trump.  Such unauthorized centers and nexus of powers need to be destroyed, demolished and legitimate functions that they once served need to be reinstated.  That means tearing them down and reconstituting them in a positive constitutional and proactive manner.  No one suggests any Marxist agenda.  No one suggests opening th edoor to any such Pandora's box. 

    • Thank you for some balance and some sembalance of civility.  I wish I were as adept, had some of your social skills.  I'm not and don't and it's a real short coming, something I accept as a fault.  I think perhaps Marelene is from a different social economic class and sort of expects some country club deference.  Her point seems to center on the fact that Democrats/Marxcists want to tear down our government for radical, sinister, and ideological motives, therefore anyone who also wants to rebalace, or reform and, or rebuild our government must also be a Democrat/Marxist.

      Listen, the reason the corruption is so pervasive and rampant is precisely because there is absolutely no accountability anywhere.  This last election was the absolutel last nail in the coffin for any democratic republic and for any future hope of accountability.  The establishment has overlapping and interlocking fields of power and influence both inside and outside of government.  Even when t heFBI get caugh red handed for example, the DOJ simply doesn't prosecute.  Just so the judicary has proven to be a failed institution.

      Outside of official power, the media doesn't inform.  It shapes public opinion, distorts and hides factual information and otherwise performs a corporate directed control of theai rwaves to rivall that of any dictatorship anywhere in the world.  OBTW I always enjoy your comments and am generally jealous of your tack and people skills.

    • AGREED SO HOW DO WE START THIS ????

    • That's the big question.  I suppose each of us begin by saying no in every way we have at our disposal and wait for more intelligent folks to begin the organizing.  General strikes, tax strikes, consummer boycotts, civil disobedience you tell me.

  • Sounds like a page out of Stalin's book.  I pray there are enough of our military that stand behind you. I do!! I thank you so much for providing hope that some KNOW what is actually happening.

  • This isn't the right discussion to post this info, but I just don't have the right one handy right now.

    SO, HERE GOES:

    This is a direct QUOTE FROM JULY 2020 SCOTUS RULING on ELECTORAL VOTES IN A FRAUDULENT ELECTION.

    "NOTHING IN THE CONSTITUTION EXPRESSLY PROHIBITS STATES FROM TAKING AWAY PRESIDENTIAL ELECTORS' VOTINGDISCRETION."

    Further in the article:

    FRAUD VITIATES (DESTROYS) EVRYTHING IT TOUCHES."

    and the article ends with this, and again I quote,

    "If fraud is poven to have been committed in a presidential election, that act of fraud VITIATES THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTES CAST BY THAT STATE.   Arizona, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan,Nevada, and other states ABSOLUTELY HAVE AUTHORITY to RECALL THEIR ELECTORS AND FORCE THEM TO FAITHFULLY CAST NEW VOTES FOR THE RIGHTFUL WINNER OF THE 2020 ELECTION___ OR, TO SIMPLY STRIP THEIR VOTES AWAY FROM THE FRAUDULENT CANDIDATE WHO CHEATED."

     

    • I don't think that will ever happen, but it is a wonderful thought.

    • And It IS that simple!

    • "NOTHING IN THE CONSTITUTION EXPRESSLY PROHIBITS STATES FROM TAKING AWAY PRESIDENTIAL ELECTORS' VOTING DISCRETION."

       

      Now all the Supreme Court has to explain is how the United States can assure a Republican form of government without conducting proper elections.

      Article IV

      Section 4

      The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

This reply was deleted.