If a new bill that has been introduced in Congress eventually becomes law, the 2nd Amendment will still be in the U.S. Constitution, but for all practical purposes the rights that it is supposed to guarantee will be dead and gone.  H.R. 127 was submitted on January 4th, and if you have not read it yet you can find the full text right here.  It contains a lot of technical language, and so in this article I am going to try to break down what it means very simply.  Now that the Democrats control the White House, the Senate and the House of Representatives, there is going to be a major push to ram through some form of gun control legislation.  If it is not this bill, it will be another one, so we need to be diligent.

One of the biggest things that H.R. 127 would do is that it would create a national firearms registration system that would literally be accessible by anyone

HR 127 establishes a federal firearms registration system that will be accessible by federal, state, and local governments, including the military – even the GENERAL PUBLIC! The system will track the make, model, and serial number of all firearms, their owners, the dates they were acquired, and where they are being stored.

So if your neighbor, a co-worker, or someone that just wanted to rob your home wanted to know how you were armed, all they would have to do would be to look it up in the firearms registration system.

This bill would also apply retroactively.

Within three months, you would have to report to the government where you bought all of your guns, when they were purchased, and where they are currently being stored.

Needless to say, if the government knows where all of your guns are being stored, it would make it that much easier to grab them from you at some future date.

H.R. 127 would also require all gun owners to be federally licensed.

That would mean that owning a gun would no longer be a right.  Instead, it would be reduced to a “privilege” that the government could take away at any time.

According to the bill, the licensing procedure would include “a psychological evaluation”

The licensing requirement mandates that the license applicant undergoes a criminal background check, and then submits to a psychological evaluation to determine whether the person is psychologically unsuited to possess a firearm. Successful licensees must show they have an insurance policy which will cost $800.

I know a lot of guys out there that would definitely not want to go through any sort of a “psychological evaluation” by a government-approved psychologist.


read more here:

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Email me when people reply –


    • They are already trying to say we are domestic terrorist for supporting Trump

    • Thats why I gave a terse reply. 

      No peace officer obedient to his oath would go pro active in enforcing unconstitutionality.

      Those that would ought to fear the blowback (literally).

      So why talk when the topic is at the "crap or get off the pot" point.

      Firearms sales are peaking. Go figure.

  • Any and all state law or Federal statute in contradiction or modification of the Second Amendments meaning is void.

    An Amendment is required.

    • Exactly, the 2d Amendment  clearly states: "... the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." 

      No law, regulation, or order may modify, change, or seek to after the right to keep and bear arms... All laws, all regulations, all government orders, that seek to modify, abridge, or infringe on that right are UNCONSTITUTIONAL.  If any judge is unable to discern the simple meaning and context of the 2d Amendment, they need to be IMPEACHED and Barred from practicing law... they are unfit to be officers of the Court in any capacity.

    • Yes, I beleive you are correct.

This reply was deleted.