ADMIN

Hidden FDA Doc Explains Why "Liar" Fauci Opposes ...

A federal district court judge has rejected a claim by the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine being administered under Emergency Use Authorization is interchangeable with Pfizer’s Comirnaty vaccine, which in August was fully licensed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

In an order issued Nov. 12 in Doe et al. v. Austin, U.S. Federal District Judge Allen Winsor of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida denied a preliminary injunction requested by 16 service members against the U.S. Military’s COVID vaccine mandate. A hearing is scheduled for Sept. 14, 2022.

However, the judge’s acknowledgment that “the DOD cannot mandate vaccines that only have an EUA” is significant for two reasons.

One reason pertains to the difference in ingredients and manufacturing process between Pfizer’s EUA vaccine and the approved Comirnaty vaccine, and the other pertains to the legal difference between a fully licensed vaccine and an EUA vaccine.

The latter reason would apply not just to the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, but also to the vaccines produced by Moderna and Johnson & Johnson (Janssen), both of which are authorized only as EUA products.

A federal district court judge has rejected a claim by the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine being administered under Emergency Use Authorization is interchangeable with Pfizer’s Comirnaty vaccine, which in August was fully licensed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

 

Under law, everyone has ‘right to refuse’ EUA product

When the FDA approved Pfizer’s Comirnaty COVID-19 vaccine in August, approval was accompanied by a series of confusing documents and equally confusing public statements.

read more:

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/judge-allen-winsor-pfizer-eua-comirnaty-vaccines-interchangeable/

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Fauci indeed needs to stand trial for Crimes against the World. Setting aside the Covid Virus being his own initiation. He personally blocked the use of "Proven Available Treatments" while pushing for Worldwide Mass Vaccination on the basis "No other options available." The Mortality Rate among healthy populations was .0002% and rose as high as .1% among the health compromised population. The "Vaccines" in order to be effective contain a "Masking Quality" which allows the vaccine to seek out and destroy the Covid. However, the "Masking Factor" also disabled the Host's own immunity system against seeking out and destroying known "Foreign Destructive Agents" within the body including previous "Heart and Cancer Diseases." All other Worldwide Vaccinations previously conducted Humanity had built up its own "Herd Immunity" over generations of time, thus allowing no chance of a particular virus, such as Small Pox to mutate. Comparatively, Today's Covid's Tier Vaccinations are rapidly creating mutations to an end potential demonstrated with the over use of "Antibacterial" against Bacteria Infections creating Complete Drug Resistant Bacteria impossible to cure! The Bacteria took approximately 80 years of abuse while Fauci is succeeding in less than 3 with a Virus. In addition, the knowledge of this outcome was well known prior to the creation  of Covid or the Vaccine. Fauci pushed it through anyway.  Fauci's Vaccine, The World's Pharmaceutical Vaccines all were completely away of the above stated facts. All were completely aware that none of the "Vaccines" created qualified under the Geneva Convention Title X "Terms and Conditions for Vaccines." Yet all Nations and thus their Pharmaceutical Manufacturers were signatories to the Convention Agreement, which includes Processes for Violations and Punishment. Unless the People of the World who choose Representatives to Stand in Their Stead in this Agreement, Force the Agreement, the words remain meaningless scribbles on paper. It is always the People who enforce the Oact, and never the Governing Body.

    Lynn Bryant DeSpain

  • The little worm would find a way to slither around the truth just like he always does.

This reply was deleted.