Terrorism (1,180)

Discussions Replies Latest Activity

ISIS to Iraqi Christians: 'Obey, Pay, or Leave'

By Chris MitchellCBN News Middle East Bureau Chief Friday, June 20, 2014   BARTILLA, Iraq -- Throughout its Iraq campaign, ISIS (Islam…

Started by Melony B. DeFord

15 Jun 22, 2014
Reply by Robert L. Hamilton

There are NO WMD's in Iraq, said every leftist in the Nation, but wait...What's this? ISIS has siezed Saddam's Chem Weapons Compound?

ISIS terrorists have seized Saddam Hussein’s chemical weapons stockpile at the Al Muthanna facility. POLL:  What grade would you give Oba…

Started by Melony B. DeFord

33 Jun 21, 2014
Reply by Tad Taylor

Allen West is sounding the alarm.....

Published on June 18th, 2014 | by Allen West Republic Allen West on June 18, 2014 Security experts have warned that Islamic militants migh…

Started by Melony B. DeFord

19 Jun 20, 2014
Reply by Janice Bloomfield

Obama sending troops to Baghdad to destroy the U.S. embassy ahead of an attack?

On Monday’s radio program, Glenn boldly declared that he hopes the United States detonates its $1 billion Baghdad embassy before it falls…

Started by Melony B. DeFord

51 Jun 19, 2014
Reply by david domacasse


Charity gone bad: When western charities and Islamism combine

The case of, what I would describe as, sham ‘human rights organisation’ Cage Prisoners (now rebranded Cage) is by now well known. Bankroll…

Started by Dee

3 Jun 18, 2014
Reply by Rev. Christine Richardson

Another Attack Discovered at an Electricity Substation Near the Border

A 50,000 gallon diesel fuel tank at a critical transformer substation south of Tucson near a border town that has been the center of immig…

Started by Linda Hahn

43 Jun 18, 2014
Reply by DeniseInAZ


Captured Computer Flash Drives Reveals the Secrets of the ISIS Terror Group in Iraq

Two days before Mosul fell to the Islamic insurgent group Isis (the Islamic State inIraq and the Levant), Iraqi commanders stood eyeballin…

Started by Dee

0 Jun 17, 2014

U.S. evacuates embassy as bombs, fighting rock Iraq

(Photo: Militant website via AP) BAGHDAD – Islamic militant insurgents captured the northern Iraqi town of Tal Afar early Monday,…

Started by Melony B. DeFord

18 Jun 16, 2014
Reply by Kenneth Hall

Iraq Security Forces Fighting Back Against ISIS

U.S. Moves Aircraft Carrier Into Persian Gulf ByMatt Bradley in Erbil, Iraq And Ali A. Nabhan in Baghdad Iraqi security forces fire…

Started by Melony B. DeFord

16 Jun 16, 2014
Reply by Skip peters


Obama DHS Adviser on ISIS: 'Inevitable That Caliphate Returns'

Mohamed Elibiary, a member on the Obama administration's Homeland Security Advisory Council, is at the center of a controversy involving al…

Started by Dee

16 Jun 16, 2014
Reply by June Gagnon




Political Cartoons by AF Branco

Political Cartoons by AF Branco


Horrible: Democrats Set The Constitution On Fire With Fraudulent Impeachment

House Democrats unveiled two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning after an investigation that violated fundamental provisions of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The investigation of the president began with the complaint of a so-called “whistleblower” who turned out to be a rogue Central Intelligence Agency employee, protected by a lawyer who had called for a “coup” against Trump in early 2017.

Democrats first demanded that the “whistleblower” be allowed to testify. But after House Intelligence Committee chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was found to have lied about his committee’s contact with the “whistleblower,” and after details of the “whistleblower’s” bias began to leak, Democrats reversed course. In violation of the President Trump’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accuser, Democrats refused to allow the “whistleblower” to testify. They argue the president’s procedural rights, even if they existed, would not apply until he was tried in the Senate — but they also invented a fraudulent “right to anonymity” that, they hope, might conceal the whistleblower even then.

Schiff began the “impeachment inquiry” in secret, behind the closed doors of the Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facility (SCIF) in the basement of the U.S. Capitol, even though none of the testimony was deemed classified. Few members of Congress were allowed access. Schiff allowed selective bits of testimony to leak to friendly media, while withholding transcripts of testimony.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), having allowed the secret process to unfold, legitimized it with a party-line vote authorizing the inquiry. The House resolution denied President Trump the procedural rights enjoyed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, and denied the minority party the traditional right to object to witnesses called by the majority.

Rather than the House Judiciary Committee, which traditionally handles impeachment, Pelosi also deputized the House Intelligence Committee to conduct fact-finding; the Judiciary Committee was turned into a rubber stamp. Schiff held a few public hearings, but often failed to release transcripts containing exculpatory evidence until after they had passed.

In the course of the Intelligence Committee’s investigation, Schiff quietly spied on the telephone records of his Republican counterpart, Ranking Member Devin Nunes (R-CA). He also snooped on the phone records of a journalist, John Solomon; and on the phone records of former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, acting as President Trump’s personal lawyer.

Schiff’s eavesdropping violated both the First Amendment right to press freedom and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Yet he proceeded undeterred by constitutional rights, publishing the phone logs in his committee’s report without warning, confirmation, or explanation, alleging that Nunes and the others were part of a conspiracy to assist the president’s allegedly impeachable conduct. When Republicans on the Judiciary Committee asked the Intelligence Committee’s majority counsel, Daniel Goldman, to explain the phone logs, he refused to answer,

Ironically, Schiff had done exactly what Democrats accuse Trump of doing: abused his power to dig up dirt on political opponents, then obstructed a congressional investigation into his party’s and his committee’s misconduct.

Democrats’ articles of impeachment include one for the dubious charge of “abuse of power,” which is not mentioned in the Constitution; and one for “obstruction of Congress,” which in this case is an abuse of power in itself.

Alexander Hamilton, writing about impeachment in Federalist 65, warned that “there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of parties, than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.” Democrats have fulfilled Hamilton’s worst fears.

The Trump impeachment will soon replace the 1868 impeachment of President Andrew Johnson — which the House Judiciary Committee staff actually cited as a positive precedent — as the worst in American history.

In service of their “coup,” Democrats have trampled the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Republic has never been in greater danger.

You don't get to interrupt me

© 2019   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service