Author Marcia Wood (Grandmother of seven awesome angels)

Wake up America this is 2012 and we’re being placed under lock and key by the one some call Obama. The abuse that African Americans have taken since 2008 is beyond belief and it’s due to the actions of the “real Obama, “not the fake one. The fake one promised African Americans the whole ball of wax, better schools, better teachers, jobs, help with their homes being repossessed, transparency, lower taxes – 95% of the African American community voted for him in 2008.

Still after the bashing the African Americans have received the majority will vote for him in 2012 – go figure. Here’s what they received from the greatest snake salesmen of all times. Higher unemployment, no jobs, homes were repossessed, absolutely no transparency and horrifically poor conditions in many of their schools due to Union control. Obama allowed the Unions to take over their schools and the trickle down affect has been inferior teachers who pretty much work banker hours for a pay check and a hefty retirement.

Like Maxine Waters insinuated Obama is MIA most of the time, not spending time in their communities – he’s too busy playing footsy with his big bundlers, the Unions, the Muslim Brotherhood and Soros’s special interest groups. In fact he’s treated them like second handed citizens and would prefer handing money out to the Gay Community then helping his own people.

Obama told African Americans to “Take off your bedroom slippers, put on your marching shoes. Shake it off. Stop complaining, stop grumbling, stop crying.” it’s not exactly the type of comment you would expect from the Commander in Chief” of America.

But after all of the lies and false promises to the African American Community many are still hanging on to his coat tails and will obediently vote for him in 2012. Instead of working with other Americans who just want to take back their Government and Country, they have bought into his class warfare and racism malarkey.

Isn’t it time for the sake of their children, grandchildren and future generations to quit hanging on to Obama’s false “Hope and Change?” He flushed their “Hope” down the toilet in early 2009 and the “Change” that they were promised was nonchalantly tossed out the White House window because Obama wanted their votes for one reason only. In a nutshell, Obama had plans to put all of us in shacks, give us enough food and water to barely make it from one meal to the next and take away our God given freedoms and rights.

The very people the African Community consider their friends and saviors are the culprits who are taking food from their mouths and money from their pockets laughing all the way to the bank. Maxine Waters, Louis Farrakhan, Al Sharpton, Van Jones, Valarie Jarrett and others are terrorizing the African American communities. These people have turned on their own people misusing and abusing them to promote a false ideology that has never worked in the history of mankind.

The African Americans who plan to vote for Obama in 2012 might want to at least check out some very special resources – they’re true Patriots and they care about all Americans and our beautiful Nation.

KristyLonestar http://tpaoa.wordpress.com/

Condoleezza Rice http://www.ranker.com/review/condoleezza-rice/766377

Alan Keyes http://www.ranker.com/review/alan-keyes/419009

Herman Cain http://www.ranker.com/review/herman-cain/1155547

Please go to this website for some of the best of the best African Americans in our Nation.

http://www.ranker.com/list/republican-and-african-american-or-the-black-republican-list/famous-conservatives?page=3

May God Bless America

As Always,

Little Tboca

The Center for Individual Freedom is a non-partisan, non-profit organization with the mission to protect and defend individual freedoms and individua…

The 'Fairness' Fraud

Thomas Sowell

During a recent Fox News Channel debate about the Obama administration's tax policies, Democrat Bob Beckel raised the issue of "fairness."

He pointed out that a child born to a poor woman in the Bronx enters the world with far worse prospects than a child born to an affluent couple in Connecticut.

No one can deny that. The relevant question, however, is: How does allowing politicians to take more money in taxes from successful people, to squander in ways that will improve their own reelection prospects, make anything more "fair" for others?

Even if additional tax revenue all went to poor single mothers -- which it will not -- the multiple problems of children raised by poor single mothers would not be cured by throwing money at them. Indeed, the skyrocketing of unwed motherhood began when government welfare programs began throwing money at teenage girls who got pregnant.

Children born and raised without fathers are a major problem to society and to themselves. There is nothing "fair" about increasing the number of such children.

A more fundamental problem with the "fairness" issue raised by Beckel and many others is the slippery vagueness of the word "fair."

To ask whether life is fair -- either here and now, or at any time or place around the world, over the past several thousand years -- is to ask a question whose answer is obvious. Life has seldom been within shouting distance of fair, in the sense of even approximately equal prospects of success.

Countries whose politicians have been able to squander ever larger amounts of a nation's resources have not only failed to make the world more fair, the concentration of more resources and power in these politicians' hands has led to results that were often counterproductive at best, and bloodily catastrophic at worst.

More fundamentally, the question whether life is fair is very different from the question whether a given society's rules are fair. Society's rules can be fair in the sense of using the same standards of rewards and punishments for everyone. But that barely scratches the surface of making prospects or outcomes the same.

People raised in different homes, neighborhoods and cultures are going to behave differently -- and those differences have consequences. The multiculturalist dogma may say that all cultures are equal, or equally deserving of respect, but treating cultures as sacrosanct freezes people into the circumstances into which they happened to be born, much like a caste system.

While talk about "fairness" may provide a fig leaf to cover politicians' naked attempts to grab more and more of the nation's resources to spend, there is no assurance that raising tax rates on "the rich" will result in any more tax revenue for the government. High tax rates have too often simply caused wealthy people to put their money into tax-free securities or to send it overseas.

Four years ago, TV interviewer Charles Gibson pointed out to candidate Barack Obama that raising capital gains tax rates had on a number of occasions led to less capital gains tax revenue being collected -- and, conversely, lowering the capital gains tax rates had on other occasions increased the amount of capital gains revenue collected by the government.

Obama readily admitted that. But he said that "fairness" justified a higher tax rate on "the rich." Yet how does a higher tax rate on paper, without a real increase in the amount of taxes actually collected, promote fairness?

However, raising tax rates on "the rich" pays off politically, even if the government loses revenues when the rich put their money into tax shelters.

High tax rates in the upper income brackets allow politicians to win votes with class warfare rhetoric, painting their opponents as defenders of the rich. Meanwhile, the same politicians can win donations from the rich by creating tax loopholes that can keep the rich from actually paying those higher tax rates -- or perhaps any taxes at all.

What is worse than class warfare is phony class warfare. Slippery talk about "fairness" is at the heart of this fraud by politicians seeking to squander more of the nation's resources.

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center

Comments

Clint Counts May 31, 2012 at 8:00pm

Join our page; HTTPS://www.Facebook.com/groups/111472616689/

Center for Individual Freedom

The Center for Individual Freedom is a non-partisan, non-profit organization with the mission to protect and defend individual freedoms and individua…
Clint Counts May 31, 2012 at 7:58pm
The 'Fairness' Fraud

Thomas Sowell

During a recent Fox News Channel debate about the Obama administration's tax policies, Democrat Bob Beckel raised the issue of "fairness."
He pointed out that a child born to a poor woman in the Bronx enters the world with far worse prospects than a child born to an affluent couple in Connecticut.

No one can deny that. The relevant question, however, is: How does allowing politicians to take more money in taxes from successful people, to squander in ways that will improve their own reelection prospects, make anything more "fair" for others?

Even if additional tax revenue all went to poor single mothers -- which it will not -- the multiple problems of children raised by poor single mothers would not be cured by throwing money at them. Indeed, the skyrocketing of unwed motherhood began when government welfare programs began throwing money at teenage girls who got pregnant.

Children born and raised without fathers are a major problem to society and to themselves. There is nothing "fair" about increasing the number of such children.

A more fundamental problem with the "fairness" issue raised by Beckel and many others is the slippery vagueness of the word "fair."

To ask whether life is fair -- either here and now, or at any time or place around the world, over the past several thousand years -- is to ask a question whose answer is obvious. Life has seldom been within shouting distance of fair, in the sense of even approximately equal prospects of success.

Countries whose politicians have been able to squander ever larger amounts of a nation's resources have not only failed to make the world more fair, the concentration of more resources and power in these politicians' hands has led to results that were often counterproductive at best, and bloodily catastrophic at worst.

More fundamentally, the question whether life is fair is very different from the question whether a given society's rules are fair. Society's rules can be fair in the sense of using the same standards of rewards and punishments for everyone. But that barely scratches the surface of making prospects or outcomes the same.

People raised in different homes, neighborhoods and cultures are going to behave differently -- and those differences have consequences. The multiculturalist dogma may say that all cultures are equal, or equally deserving of respect, but treating cultures as sacrosanct freezes people into the circumstances into which they happened to be born, much like a caste system.

While talk about "fairness" may provide a fig leaf to cover politicians' naked attempts to grab more and more of the nation's resources to spend, there is no assurance that raising tax rates on "the rich" will result in any more tax revenue for the government. High tax rates have too often simply caused wealthy people to put their money into tax-free securities or to send it overseas.

Four years ago, TV interviewer Charles Gibson pointed out to candidate Barack Obama that raising capital gains tax rates had on a number of occasions led to less capital gains tax revenue being collected -- and, conversely, lowering the capital gains tax rates had on other occasions increased the amount of capital gains revenue collected by the government.

Obama readily admitted that. But he said that "fairness" justified a higher tax rate on "the rich." Yet how does a higher tax rate on paper, without a real increase in the amount of taxes actually collected, promote fairness?

However, raising tax rates on "the rich" pays off politically, even if the government loses revenues when the rich put their money into tax shelters.

High tax rates in the upper income brackets allow politicians to win votes with class warfare rhetoric, painting their opponents as defenders of the rich. Meanwhile, the same politicians can win donations from the rich by creating tax loopholes that can keep the rich from actually paying those higher tax rates -- or perhaps any taxes at all.

What is worse than class warfare is phony class warfare. Slippery talk about "fairness" is at the heart of this fraud by politicians seeking to squander more of the nation's resources.
sandi a. May 31, 2012 at 7:49pm

Marcia Wood sure has it right, and well spoken. Our children and grand children need a better country than Obama is trying to make it. He has done enough damage in a little over 3 years. I shutter to think what will happen in another 4 years. "I will have more wiggle room, after the election" Heaven help America if he does.
Andrew Gober May 31, 2012 at 7:45pm

Jim,
I understand your frustration when you have been awakened and you are no longer blinded by the Obama (NWO) deception. Please realize that all of us were at one time fooled and blinded to the truth. It will take time and détermination to wake up everyone.
Barbara J. Siegfried May 31, 2012 at 6:51pm

Print that in the newspapers.....if you can. Take it door to door.
James Higginbotham May 31, 2012 at 6:49pm

Howdy.

those SLAVE MINDED BLACKS will vote for this Muslim USURPER only because he is BLACK

they CAN'T or wont see beyond SKIN COLOR.

he is THEIR BOY RIGHT OR WRONG OR LEGAL, all they care about is GETTING OVER ON WHITEY and that's the TRUTH OF IT plain and simple.

Semper Fi.

Jim.

of 2

This reply was deleted.

ACTION

The Real Obama – Not the Fake One

Comments

The 'Fairness' Fraud