RUBIO MUST DISQUALIFY HIMSELF FROM HIGH OFFICE.
By J.B. Williams
http://www.newswithviews.com/JBWilliams/williams234.htm
January 20, 2013
If so-called “constitutionalists” were better acquainted with the Constitution (Charters of Freedom), they
would not be supporting Marco Rubio for an office he is not eligible to hold and they would have already removed Barack Hussein Obama from the office he currently holds fraudulently. Marco Rubio is in the unique position to solve our nation’s greatest problem, to remove a foreign agent currently assaulting America from within the Oval Office and set the nation back on a constitutional course towards freedom and liberty. Rubio has an opportunity to be a true American hero. Will he be?
Because Rubio was dragged into the political spotlight by Tea Party folks in desperate search of new conservative leadership, and because he shares in common with Obama, constitutional ineligibility for the
offices of president and vice president under Article II requirements, he is uniquely positioned to bring down the most anti-American regime to ever hold political power in the United States.
Unlike “birthers” who are trying to disqualify Obama on the basis of his unconfirmed place of birth (native born
status), which is still in question due to Obama’s fraudulent efforts to hide his real past and true identity, using nondisclosure and forged documents to remain a total mystery, -- true “constitutionalists” who have studied the matter completely and allowed the facts to emerge without partisan purpose, know the whole truth.
1) The foundations for America are stated in the preamble to the Declaration of Independence. Pay particular attention to the parts highlighted.
IN
CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,“When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.”
Contrary to contemporary teachings by revisionists, the legal precepts for everything our Founders created is NOT "British common law" which we separated from via the Declaration and the American Revolution. It is "The laws of Nature and of Nature's God," as stated in the preamble to our nation’s founding document, The Declaration. Just as freedom and liberty are “natural rights” inalienable by men, so is the right of Natural Born Citizenship.
2) Revisionists claim that Natural Born Citizen is not defined in the Constitution. However, the US Constitution does not have a definitions section; therefore, it provides no definition for any of the words or terms used in that document. Of course, as the Charters of Freedom were written in plain simple English so that any citizen could read and comprehend their rights and the limited functions of the government bodies they were to form, no definitions were needed. Everyone alive at the time knew the true meaning of every word and every term, including Natural Born Citizen. But 236 years later, dumbed down by revisionist propaganda, Americans may have to do a little homework to rediscover basic truths.
3) During that period in history, the framing of the Charters of Freedom, our Founders left a perfect record of their concerns and intents in the Federalist Papers. Anyone not able to comprehend the simple English carefully crafted in the Charters of Freedom can study the thoughts behind those words in the Federalist
Papers. If you do not know the Federalists Papers, you do not know the Constitution.
4) There is no guess-work or ambiguity… We know from reading the correspondences of our Founders, that they borrowed the concepts for the Charters of Freedom (Natural Law - Laws of Nature - God's Law - inalienable Law of Nations) -- from the internationally recognized authority on the subject at the time, Vattel, recorded in French and later translated to English, The Law of Nations, written on the inalienable laws of nature respected by all nations and inescapable by man. [Most of the Founding Fathers were as fluent in French as they were
English.] Included, was the term Natural Born Citizen, a citizen by the laws of nature, not the laws of man, in fact, inalienable by the laws of man.
In Vattel's Law of Nations, he defines the term Natural Born Citizen, not in one sentence, but in several sections, 211 – 233 of Book One. One truly seeking the truth about our Charters of Freedom and Natural Born Citizenship should read the entire Law of Nations, it is a brilliant work on Natural Law and it is in fact the cornerstone of the Charters of Freedom created by our Founders.
But in short, Vattel defines Natural Born Citizen as follow;
NOTE: "Birthers" mistakenly (or intentionally) cherry-pick a single sentence from several sections on the subject, discarding all else, including the actual definition. - "The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens." - This is NOT the definition of Natural Born Citizen. It is only a general statement affirming that natives are born in country and naturals are born of citizen parents.
Vattel goes on to define Natural Born Citizen and the reasoning behind it...
* "As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights."
** "The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent."
*** "I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country."
This is why Barack Hussein Obama is a total fraud, constitutionally ineligible for office. Unfortunately, so is Marco Rubio, among others.
If Marco Rubio is the great “American Son” he portrays himself to be, the great young constitutionally conservative leader that so many Tea Party folks hope that he is, he must take a stand for the U.S. Constitution
and America right now, as only he can do. Because many of his loyal followers have such high hopes for his political future, Marco Rubio can secure that future by taking the stand that only he is positioned to take right
now.
Unless and until so-called "constitutionalists" get Article II right, they can forget every right they think they have....because if Article II does not exist in force or affect, neither does any other part of those founding
documents that protect the Natural Rights of all American citizens.
I call upon Marco Rubio to stand and become the great leader he wants to be, the leader so many believe him to be. I call upon Marco Rubio to stand and tell ALL Americans that he is ineligible for the offices of president and vice president, as the natural born son of a Father who was a citizen of Cuba (not the United States) at the time of his birth.
Man-made statutes generously gave Rubio and many others like him, American citizenship, via the 14th Amendment, our immigration and naturalization amendment governing the citizenship rights of immigrants through naturalization, or native born rights.
Rubio is a citizen of the United States by way of man-made laws, not Natural Law. Likewise, no matter whether Obama was born in Hawaii or Kenya, his natural birth Father was at no time in his life a citizen of the United States. Therefore, Obama’s Father could not confer to Barack Hussein Obama II that which he did not possess, U.S. Citizenship.
Marco Rubio can solve this entire issue and much more. He can stop Obama’s Marxist march off the cliff and save the country he claims to care about deeply, as well as freedom and liberty in America. He can do so by standing up before the nation and the world, proclaiming himself ineligible for high office and demanding that Barack Hussein Obama be immediately removed from office and charged with high treason for the most horrific fraud ever perpetrated on the American public and the world.
If Rubio refuses to do so, he is NOT what so many had hoped. He will be nothing more than just another political fraud seeking personal gain at the expense of the U.S. Charters of Freedom and the future of freedom and liberty, not just here, but throughout the free world.
If Article II no longer matters, nothing in the Charters of Freedom matters anymore. I call upon Marco Rubio to take a stand and end this nightmare. Stand and tell the people the truth Mr. Rubio, or become just another disappointment to the people, pandering to the captive Tea Party audience but no less complicit in the massive
fraud.
DO IT NOW… Before a second fraudulent inauguration!
I have sent this call for action directly to Marco Rubio and I call upon you to do the same.
JB Williams is a writer on matters of history and American politics with more than 3000 pieces published over a
twenty-year span. He has a decidedly conservative reverence for the Charters of Freedom, the men and women who have paid the price of freedom and liberty for all, and action oriented real-time solutions for modern challenges. He is a Christian, a husband, a father, a researcher, writer and a business owner. He is
co-founder of action organizations The United States Patriots Union, a civilian parent organization for The Veteran Defenders of America. He is also co-founder of The North American Law Center, a citizen run investigative legal research and activism organization preparing to take on American's greatest legal battles. Williams receives mail at: jb.uspu@gmail.com
Comments
LarryM, misunderstanding here. Before 2008 election, the people who were questioning O's qualifications for President, as per the Constitution, were "Alinskied" immediately. Which since then, if you notice, anyone who challenges anything seems to get labeled and attacked/ridiculed, almost to the level of personal destruction. The eligibility movement just happened to be the first group I remember this happening to. Had nothing to do with you.
In the Constitution, there is only one "extra" requirement for the office of Prez. Article II, Section 1, Paragraph 5, "natural born citizen." The scholars can debate the definition of those words. However; in studying the Federalist Papers, it is very apparent even to a layman like me that those words were specific because they were bestowing Commander in Chief of the military in the Prez. office and they were concerned about a dual loyalty citizen being in charge of the US military. (i.e. British)
Interesting twist...what if O's father is Frank Marshall Davis? But O had created this narrative, and produced a document stating British Citizen Father, that equals dual-citizen by birth.
Anyway, I LOVE Marco Rubio! No matter what his status, he has a lot to contribute to this Country, and the Republican party in general. I recommend his book. He's a humble, God-fearing man, very family oriented. His book talks a lot about his early influence of his grandfather, and appreciation for what his parents sacrificed for the betterment of their family. He is the true epitome of the "American Dream" of immigrants who came here to live in freedom. He also chronicles his election and the dirty politics of Florida and Charlie Crist, and then the RINO Establishment in DC who wanted Crist.
So Larry, guess we'll just have to agree to disagree. And again, I wasn't speaking about any of us here being Alinskied. The O group has done this repeatedly to any group who questioned his background for any reason.
Rubio is not eligible. I have his book. He was 4 years old when his parents became US Citizens.
"An American Son" by Marco Rubio,, U.S. Senator from Florida, Chapter 3, page 24.
"Three of four of his parents children were born American Citizens. Rubio was born May 28th, 1971, in 1975 his parents became US Citizens ( after living in the US for 20 years previous, and realizing that Castro was now a Totalitarian, they could no longer return to Cuba). His older brother Mario "naturalized" after getting out of the Army.
O/T but related: Natural born is born from citizen parents. Congress knows this. Go read the resolution they passed (irony alert, Obama was a sponsor) for John McCain. Also, since before the Terminator wanted to run for Gov of CA there have been I think EIGHT different pieces of legislation to change the Presidential requirement for eligibility. THAT tells me I am correct, (and THEY know and are complicit) even if I hadn't already come to the conclusion that the "Eligibility Movement" is correct (declared Father British Citizen, which means he is a dual-citizen, at the least) by studying the Constitution for 5 years.
Also, I refer to those questioning this as the "Eligibility" movement because I believe that is one of the first Saul Alinksy (isolate/ridicule) tactics that the O team pulled to convince us of those "crazies" and it worked.
There is a Supreme Court ruling in the 1800's on natural born citizens. I do not know the date.. Someone who is good with the computer can help. Maybe with WND archives and some of Obama's eligibility cases. I now it was mentioned in his cases.
"Native-born" is not the same as "natural-born"; were they the same, we would not have two [different] terms. "Natural-born" comes from "natural law"; "natural law" prevails over any law made by man. Once again, The Founders used Emmerich deVattel's Law of Nations as their guiding document/source because it was recognized world-wide as the definitive reference for law and international relations at the time, and it was important that the fledgling government be recognized as legitimate among the other nations of the Earth.
Many argue that "natural born" is not defined in The Constitution. Neither is "vote" nor "people" nor "tax" nor hundreds of other terms. Indeed, our Constitution does not have a glossary, having been written in the "common" vernacular of the day so that any literate man could read and understand it. That there is, today, discussion and confusion about the terms used in The Constitution is but further evidence of how far we have strayed from the original intent of The Founders.
Senator Rubio is "native-born", but he is not, according to Emmerich deVattel (the Founders' guide) "natural born".
No more argument from me; substituting anything for dogma is nearly always exhausting and pointless.
Carry on, Mr. Bulow.
Resident aliens, tourists and students on visas, foreign dignitaries...
...There are lots of ways to be "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" than citizenship. Being in a country legally does not, necessarily, require one to be a citizen.
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
of 14 Next