RUBIO MUST DISQUALIFY HIMSELF FROM HIGH OFFICE.
By J.B. Williams
http://www.newswithviews.com/JBWilliams/williams234.htm
January 20, 2013
If so-called “constitutionalists” were better acquainted with the Constitution (Charters of Freedom), they
would not be supporting Marco Rubio for an office he is not eligible to hold and they would have already removed Barack Hussein Obama from the office he currently holds fraudulently. Marco Rubio is in the unique position to solve our nation’s greatest problem, to remove a foreign agent currently assaulting America from within the Oval Office and set the nation back on a constitutional course towards freedom and liberty. Rubio has an opportunity to be a true American hero. Will he be?
Because Rubio was dragged into the political spotlight by Tea Party folks in desperate search of new conservative leadership, and because he shares in common with Obama, constitutional ineligibility for the
offices of president and vice president under Article II requirements, he is uniquely positioned to bring down the most anti-American regime to ever hold political power in the United States.
Unlike “birthers” who are trying to disqualify Obama on the basis of his unconfirmed place of birth (native born
status), which is still in question due to Obama’s fraudulent efforts to hide his real past and true identity, using nondisclosure and forged documents to remain a total mystery, -- true “constitutionalists” who have studied the matter completely and allowed the facts to emerge without partisan purpose, know the whole truth.
1) The foundations for America are stated in the preamble to the Declaration of Independence. Pay particular attention to the parts highlighted.
IN
CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,“When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.”
Contrary to contemporary teachings by revisionists, the legal precepts for everything our Founders created is NOT "British common law" which we separated from via the Declaration and the American Revolution. It is "The laws of Nature and of Nature's God," as stated in the preamble to our nation’s founding document, The Declaration. Just as freedom and liberty are “natural rights” inalienable by men, so is the right of Natural Born Citizenship.
2) Revisionists claim that Natural Born Citizen is not defined in the Constitution. However, the US Constitution does not have a definitions section; therefore, it provides no definition for any of the words or terms used in that document. Of course, as the Charters of Freedom were written in plain simple English so that any citizen could read and comprehend their rights and the limited functions of the government bodies they were to form, no definitions were needed. Everyone alive at the time knew the true meaning of every word and every term, including Natural Born Citizen. But 236 years later, dumbed down by revisionist propaganda, Americans may have to do a little homework to rediscover basic truths.
3) During that period in history, the framing of the Charters of Freedom, our Founders left a perfect record of their concerns and intents in the Federalist Papers. Anyone not able to comprehend the simple English carefully crafted in the Charters of Freedom can study the thoughts behind those words in the Federalist
Papers. If you do not know the Federalists Papers, you do not know the Constitution.
4) There is no guess-work or ambiguity… We know from reading the correspondences of our Founders, that they borrowed the concepts for the Charters of Freedom (Natural Law - Laws of Nature - God's Law - inalienable Law of Nations) -- from the internationally recognized authority on the subject at the time, Vattel, recorded in French and later translated to English, The Law of Nations, written on the inalienable laws of nature respected by all nations and inescapable by man. [Most of the Founding Fathers were as fluent in French as they were
English.] Included, was the term Natural Born Citizen, a citizen by the laws of nature, not the laws of man, in fact, inalienable by the laws of man.
In Vattel's Law of Nations, he defines the term Natural Born Citizen, not in one sentence, but in several sections, 211 – 233 of Book One. One truly seeking the truth about our Charters of Freedom and Natural Born Citizenship should read the entire Law of Nations, it is a brilliant work on Natural Law and it is in fact the cornerstone of the Charters of Freedom created by our Founders.
But in short, Vattel defines Natural Born Citizen as follow;
NOTE: "Birthers" mistakenly (or intentionally) cherry-pick a single sentence from several sections on the subject, discarding all else, including the actual definition. - "The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens." - This is NOT the definition of Natural Born Citizen. It is only a general statement affirming that natives are born in country and naturals are born of citizen parents.
Vattel goes on to define Natural Born Citizen and the reasoning behind it...
* "As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights."
** "The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent."
*** "I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country."
This is why Barack Hussein Obama is a total fraud, constitutionally ineligible for office. Unfortunately, so is Marco Rubio, among others.
If Marco Rubio is the great “American Son” he portrays himself to be, the great young constitutionally conservative leader that so many Tea Party folks hope that he is, he must take a stand for the U.S. Constitution
and America right now, as only he can do. Because many of his loyal followers have such high hopes for his political future, Marco Rubio can secure that future by taking the stand that only he is positioned to take right
now.
Unless and until so-called "constitutionalists" get Article II right, they can forget every right they think they have....because if Article II does not exist in force or affect, neither does any other part of those founding
documents that protect the Natural Rights of all American citizens.
I call upon Marco Rubio to stand and become the great leader he wants to be, the leader so many believe him to be. I call upon Marco Rubio to stand and tell ALL Americans that he is ineligible for the offices of president and vice president, as the natural born son of a Father who was a citizen of Cuba (not the United States) at the time of his birth.
Man-made statutes generously gave Rubio and many others like him, American citizenship, via the 14th Amendment, our immigration and naturalization amendment governing the citizenship rights of immigrants through naturalization, or native born rights.
Rubio is a citizen of the United States by way of man-made laws, not Natural Law. Likewise, no matter whether Obama was born in Hawaii or Kenya, his natural birth Father was at no time in his life a citizen of the United States. Therefore, Obama’s Father could not confer to Barack Hussein Obama II that which he did not possess, U.S. Citizenship.
Marco Rubio can solve this entire issue and much more. He can stop Obama’s Marxist march off the cliff and save the country he claims to care about deeply, as well as freedom and liberty in America. He can do so by standing up before the nation and the world, proclaiming himself ineligible for high office and demanding that Barack Hussein Obama be immediately removed from office and charged with high treason for the most horrific fraud ever perpetrated on the American public and the world.
If Rubio refuses to do so, he is NOT what so many had hoped. He will be nothing more than just another political fraud seeking personal gain at the expense of the U.S. Charters of Freedom and the future of freedom and liberty, not just here, but throughout the free world.
If Article II no longer matters, nothing in the Charters of Freedom matters anymore. I call upon Marco Rubio to take a stand and end this nightmare. Stand and tell the people the truth Mr. Rubio, or become just another disappointment to the people, pandering to the captive Tea Party audience but no less complicit in the massive
fraud.
DO IT NOW… Before a second fraudulent inauguration!
I have sent this call for action directly to Marco Rubio and I call upon you to do the same.
JB Williams is a writer on matters of history and American politics with more than 3000 pieces published over a
twenty-year span. He has a decidedly conservative reverence for the Charters of Freedom, the men and women who have paid the price of freedom and liberty for all, and action oriented real-time solutions for modern challenges. He is a Christian, a husband, a father, a researcher, writer and a business owner. He is
co-founder of action organizations The United States Patriots Union, a civilian parent organization for The Veteran Defenders of America. He is also co-founder of The North American Law Center, a citizen run investigative legal research and activism organization preparing to take on American's greatest legal battles. Williams receives mail at: jb.uspu@gmail.com
Comments
Rubio was born in Miami but his parents were citizens of Cuba and never filed for citizenship until 4 yrs after Rubio was born. Also according to Amendment 12 last sentence Rubio is not even qualified to run as VP by not being a Natural Born Citizen. He is at most a naturalized Citizen because of his birth in Miami.
Sorry, I meant Ralph's daughter is a NBC.
Terry, Steve is not out of line especially since many, including Sean Hannity, often suggested before the previous primaries and after Romney was picked that Rubio would make an excellent choice for the VP spot.
The ongoing talk in the Republican Party is WHO is going to be their nominee in the 2016 election and Rubio and even Jindel's names are continually being suggested. We need to put a stop to this now before it wrecks what remains of the conservative voice in the Republican Party.
I love Rubio's sometimes conservative voice but would never vote for him as president/vp. I have objected to Obama over the years and his ineligibility and for me to vote for Rubio for the same office would make me a hypocrite would it not?
Yes, without doubt McCain is a NBC. I wish Obama was vetted as much as the democrats vetted McCain. Fact is anyone born to a mother AND father who are American citizens even if born on foreign soil is considered as NBC as long as neither of the parents adopted foreign citizenship before the birth.
Bob is exactly right. His daughter is a NBC.
Ralph,
I think you're right. "Born in the country" would seem to equate with "born within the jurisdiction of the United States". In your daughter's case, as well as McCain's, birth on a US military base seems to have satisfied the jurisdictional requirement.
Ralph, you misunderstood my post. I guess I should have been more specific. mccain is a natural born citizen but didn't want the fight over the issue so he and his lackeys backed down, as is his normal proceedure. NBC is determined by the citizenship of the parents at the time of birth not the child. I understand that mccain was born in a civilian hospital but that still doesn't matter. He backed down because he is a liberal coward who cares more about ruling than governing. republicrats knew mccain and mitty the poo, the all-white obama couldn't win, that is why they were annointed by the ruling elites. A true conservative could have won either election but that isn't the purpose of the RNC.
Diane is absolutely on target with her comment. Rubio is the annointed one for 2016 and if they make an issue of eligibility it will bite them when they announce Rubio's nomination. Just as with mitty the Poo, the all-white obama, the liberal elites in the republicrat establishment have their patsy lined up for years ahead. They don't care about our nation, liberty, or what We the People want. Government of the people, by the people, and for the people is not on the agenda of either political party.
I suspect that one of the main reasons why the Republicans have not made the issue of Obama not being 'natural born' is because two of their favorite sons, Rubio and Jindel, are not natural born themselves. It is almost as if they give Obama a pass so they can nominate their own 'not eligible' candidate in 2016.
Marco Rubio's son without condition is natural born since he was born here of US citizens.
Steve,this is not about the grand-son, if I understand your point. Rubio was born here and therefore his son, but not himself, would be natural born having been parented by two U.S. citizens. I do agree that Rubio is pushing many Latino issues some of which are of no benefit to the United States sovereignty but are geared toward a select group. That is not Americanism but separatism in my eyes, no different than Obama and his poor vs rich or his phony black heritage arguments.
Why won't the GOP approach the issue of Obama's fraud presidency? Bunch of chickens!
I am sad to say Marco Rubio is not qualified and the ones positioning him need to STP....
Last time I checked, Marco Rubio wasn't running for Presidaent or VP! Steve Smith- you are a bit out of line.
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
of 14 Next