ACTION

un (25)

Rajjpuut's Folly: Do you know what our House of Representatives just did?

Posted by Bob VanDeHey on September 26, 2010 at 12:00pm

“If the folks in the Gulf were angry about the six-month drilling moratorium Obama sent them, this is a permanent moratorium on Gulf oil drilling operations . . . did you even notice? Put down that %&$(*$@%)#$% remote! Our country is being sent down the toilet and you’re watching television?” Rajjpuut

Would you Vote to Give America Away to the U.N.?

For all those of you who just can’t believe that America and the American dream are expendable in progressive-Democratic** eyes, open your eyes NOW. The United States House of Representatives under Democratic control (specifically led by Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer) and only needing a simple majority to pass any bill just voted to put great chunks of our oceans, our coasts and our oil under control of the United Nations. Would you vote to do that? Would you authorize your representative to do that. The Senate will soon take this matter up for vote. Would you authorize your state’s senators to vote for this?

Yesterday in this Rajjpuut’s Folly blog . . . .

http://rajjpuutsfolly.blogtownhall.com/

http://rajjpuutsfolly.blogtownhall.com/2010/09/25/lacking_testicles,_republican_leaders_submit_to_obama_lies.thtml

we showed you a monstrous truth that apparently the Republican leadership hasn’t got the brains, guts or testicles to put out before you. Today’s truth about the so-called “CLEAR ACT” HR 3534 . . . .

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-3534

shows you just exactly what happens when Americans are too busy watching their sit-coms and Irreality TV shows and too busy to pay attention to what the progressives (“we need to ‘progress’ beyond the outdated and flawed United States Constitution in order to bring about a Utopia here on earth”) in government are doing to us. In a nutshell . . . while most Americans are twiddling their thumbs and dipping their potato chips into unhealthy triple-cheese concoctions the global-thinking progressives in the House have just voted to give away our land, oceans and adjacent land masses and even the Great Lakes to an international body which will make us pay $900 million per year 2040. Would you vote for that? Would you authorize your rep to vote for that; or your senator to make it a law this coming week?

HR 3534 is designed to put America back into the year 1905. But it is far worse than that . . . . It is first of all: UNCONSTITUTIONAL. HR 3534 mandates membership in something called “the Law of the Sea Treaty” without the required two-thirds vote to ratify it in the U.S. Senate as is required of all treaties the country enters into. It creates permanent obstacles to normal American energy operations. It will be a permanent roadblock to American and drive American companies out of the Gulf permanently, delay future drilling, increase dependency on foreign oil, and will implement climate change legislation and youth education programs; but most important, it mandates membership in the Law of the Sea Treaty without the required two-thirds vote to ratify it in the U.S. Senate. If the folks in the Gulf were angry about the six-month drilling moratorium Obama sent us, this is a permanent moratorium on Gulf oil drilling operations . . . did you even notice? Put down that %&$(*$@%)#$% remote! Our country is being sent down the toilet and you’re watching television?”

http://www.boogai.net/top-story/breaking-us-house-puts-oceans-coasts-under-un-senate-vote-will-seal-the-deal/

We won’t dwell on how evil all this is, after all, you deserve it if you’re not paying attention and especially if you voted for progressives in the last three elections (about 85% of the Democrats and 10% of the Republicans in the House and Senate) . . . but, now that your eyes are open, are you going to let them pass this bill in the senate without a whimper from you?

Ya’all live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut

** If you’ve been paying attention, you know that the progressive control of this country is now pushing 100% for Marxist aims . . . two months ago, a liberal think-tank did a poll in which 55% of Americans said the label “socialist” was fitting for Obama . . . well 90% of Americans haven’t paid attention. Obama is a Marxist and Marxists think globally (Workers of the world, UNITE!) and in their thinking, not just rich Americans but all Americans must “suffer a little” to redistribute wealth globally for the benefit of all (From each according to their ability, to each according to their needs.) and if you haven’t the brains or guts to realize what’s happening, it’s called a “Fire Sale” on America.

Read more…

obama bashes arizona

Posted by james c. cochran on August 24, 2010 at 5:00pm
Obama Hauls Arizona Before the UN Human Rights Council
By Ben Johnson, Floyd Reports
Apparently Barack Obama is not content to make a federal case out of his immigration feud with Arizona; he wants to make it an international one.

The president’s first-ever report on U.S. human rights to the UN Human Rights Council contains a rich vein of offensive material. So far, one aspect has not been reported: our petty president used the situation to bash Arizona’s immigration law. Throughout the report — while sounds like an Obama campaign speech — the president discusses “the original flaw” of the U.S. Constitution, America’s tolerance for slavery, and his version of our long and despicable history of discriminating against and oppressing minorities, women, homosexuals, and the handicapped. After each complaint, he addresses how he is delivering us from ourselves, patting himself on the back for such initiatives as ending “torture,” promoting Affirmative Action, and passing health care legislation.

In his section on “Values and Immigration,” he praised the Department of Homeland Security’s efforts to provide better medical care for detainees and increase “Alternatives To Detention” (e.g., letting them go). Then he turned to the one state that has had the temerity to stand in his way of fundamentally transforming the American electorate:
Read more…

Don't give Parental Rights to the United Nations; block it now before O'Bama submits UN Treaty for ratification by the Senate.

Posted by GrizzlyMama on June 9, 2010 at 10:30am

We must stop ratification of UN Treaty!

ParentalRights

Why Not? - http://eepurl.com/BV9x Call and ask your Senator WHY NOT cosponsor SR 519 to halt the UN CRC?

SR 519 is sponsored by Sen. De Mint to stop Pres. Obama from even introducing the UN Treaty right of a child. Frankly I don't want anything to do with the UN Treaty and I believe it must not be ratified. Don't wait for OBama to bring it to the floor of the Senate. Act now! GOP Senate Names and Phone Numbers are provided for those Senators who have not signed the resolution to block OBama...

Read more…

U.N. can go straight to Hell!!

Posted by Tommy Henderson on May 12, 2010 at 7:06am
Now the U.N. is telling American's how to govern their own people? They can go straight to Hell!! Are they currently aware who foot's the majority of U.N. Fund's? We do. They are so unable to act in a way that is unbias. They like to pretend they can accomplish everything without the U.S., and while they show resentment towards us, they are cashing our check. Let's cancel some of those checks and then lets see how much they can truly accomplish? I find no real proof of racism or ethinc discrimination anywhere in Arizona's Law. They want us to keep our border's wide open and unsafe. Why do we support the U.N.? And as for the ethnic studies I don't believe that a race specific class is equality. They are allowed to have a racial Identity and we are not. How is that fair? You try and be proud for being white and they will call it racism. So minorities are encouraged to be proud while whites are demonized for it. and what happens when the minority becomes the majority? Will those practices still be allowed? of course. If your going to be proud for being black, then I'm going to be proud for being white. As simple as that. We may have made mistakes in our past, but whites are not only. Why are Hispanics not mentioned for their part in slavery? Why are African slave traders not mentioned in slavery? Why are Arab's not mentioned for their big part in slavery? Interesting. And are people aware that African's also had African slaves? or that they also had white slaves? Again interseting. And i think it's to funny how African Americans and Hispanic Americans ally themselves with Democrats. It's like they aren't aware that Democrats were actually for slavery. LOL!! Humans are so funny acting. Now I have no problem for racial identity if its fair for all of us. This Nation is full of unfairness and inequality when it comes to race. Why can't we just be human? Anywho I'll be back with more, I need to get some of that good old coffee!! God bless!!
Read more…

Rajjpuut's Folly: Obama Objects NOT to Iran on U.N. Women's Rights Commission

Posted by Bob VanDeHey on May 9, 2010 at 2:00pm
U.S. Fails to Oppose U.N. Women's Rights Commission Seat for Iran

When it comes to former enemies and disfunctional Muslim regimes, Barack Obama has a yellow streak a mile wide coloring his back. And his lackeys? Even worse it seems as U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice rather than opposing Iran’s new seat on the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) was out getting her hair done or nails or, who can know because our U.N. representative skipped the U.N. altogether rather than showing up to oppose Iran being seated on the important international women’s rights commission at the U.N.

Naming Hitler “Rabbi” would probably be less offensive than seating Iran on any panel dealing with women’s rights, if there is a more hostile regime on earth toward women than Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s little insane asylum, Rajjpuut is unaware of it .

Item: Less than three weeks ago, Iranian cleric Ayatollah Kazem Sedighi of Tehran said that women’s immodest behavior and clothing was the cause of earthquakes. Good job, Kaze, Rajjpuut is very interested in what makes the earth move for men and women . . . .

Item: Women in Iran are stoned to death if their husband merely claims infidelity.

Item: Women can be arrested for sunbathing or sporting a tan.

Item: Accusations of homosexual behavior by women by their husband is grounds for execution. Male homosexuality gets flogging, and the homosexuality must be proved.

Item: Wearing of western style clothing by a woman is grounds for immediate arrest and imprisonment.

Item: 9-year old girls can be married off by their families.

Item: No matter if the husband in an arranged marriage is 60 years older than his girl-bride, she has no recourse if her father sells her off.

Item: Iranian Men who drink alcohol or gamble can be publically whipped; women doing the same thing are eligible for death by stoning.

Item: Men who even feel their wife is “uppity” can beat her as much as they wish. Much Islamic discussion in Iran is spent discussing the size and flexibility of the recommended rod used for such beating. Actually, Rajjpuut is NOT opposed to this one . . . . : )

Item: The Iranian dress code for women and policy of discouragement of women’s education is closely akin to the Taliban’s.

Item: Iran’s own women’s rights activists (while dodging stones?) wrote a letter to the U.N. Commission on the Status of Women declaring that placing Iran on the CSW would seriously set back the cause of women everywhere.

Item: Unmarried Iranian women caught having sex may be executed.

Item: Women expressing opposition to sharia (strict Islamic code of behavior and punishment as outlined in the Koran) law can be executed.

Item: An Iranian woman who offends her husband, for example by trying to stop his beating of her, and strikes him in the process can have her hand chopped off. It’s recommended that she repent after the mutilation . . . you think?

This hideous regime being nominated to any position of power or influence is utter infamy. The American delegation could have stopped the move in its tracks by merely raising an objection. Rajjpuut suggests that here, if ever there was one, is an opportunity to rail against the regime’s track record on women’s rights. Not a peep. So beginning in 2011, Iran will start help setting policy for women’s treatment around the world. NICE!!! Nice job, Mr. Obama!

Ya’ll live long, strong and ornery,

Rajjpuut

Read more…