hillary (129)

By Jim Mullen

The American electoral process, especially on the federal level, has always been something less than genteel. From the earliest days of our founding, political office seekers attacked each other unmercifully, and acted more like unruly, spiteful children than educated, brilliant men who had just formulated the greatest concept in government ever conceived by man.

Likewise, the news media of the day, newspapers and periodic magazines, chose sides and muckraked politicians and disparaged their families. They used their newborn constitutional freedom to guarantee only the fiercest, thick-skinned individuals survived the ordeal.

In this year’s Democrat primaries, voters are not flocking to the polls as they did in the last two presidential elections. The voters who are voting are split because Hillary Clinton is not radical enough or redistributionist enough. The far-left, after seven years of encouragement by Obama, feels they have a mandate to go for the full Monty, flat-out communism.

Hillary Clinton and her Marxist supporters are deathly afraid Barack Obama’s absence from the ticket will mean blacks will fail to make extraordinary efforts to vote in the fall election. They equally fear that women will get the “I’ve had it up to here” blues and avoid the polls.

What this means is, they must go after the black, and women vote with a vengeance. The country must be ready for an all-out assault on Middle America. Every value and principle, on which this Republic was founded, will be laid low by these two deeply flawed, radical Marxists and their lemming-like supporters.

The Communist indoctrination Sanders and Clinton supporters received in the classrooms of schools and American colleges and universities, will compel them to demonize evil capitalism and demand total control by the federal government. These useful idiots have no concept of the real world or what the country would be under a system they so mindlessly crave and pursue with such zeal.

It’s an understatement to say the left doesn’t play nicely with the truth. Indeed, the two are at war. Leftists use every weapon at their disposal to kill the truth. Marxism depends upon lies, misinformation, indoctrination, intimidation, and finally violence on its path to tyranny.

 “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.”  - Joseph Goebbels

From now until Election Day, Goebbel's indoctrination philosophy will be prominent on the national political stage by the party of racism; the Democrat Party. Because they are the party of racism, they incessantly call others racist to deflect from their own history.

For example, they have a history of Jim Crow, the Klan, segregation, Woodrow Wilson, and Hillary Clinton’s favorite, one of the most wicked, immoral racists in history, Margaret Sanger. Founder of Planned Parenthood, she advocated the extermination of blacks, the poor, and any people with infirmities.

They frantically run from their sordid past, but cannot hide when faced with the truth. They rewrite history books, but cannot change history. For years, the Democrat Party has fashioned a public image of working to help the poor and middle class while hiding the reality that it targets the vulnerable.

Liberal progressives tell any lie, use every dirty trick known to man, and then utilize street riots, and civil disobedience to viciously defend their lies. Mischief and mayhem will be standard fare on every left-wing menu until the November election.

They will, of course, be led and abetted by the uber-liberal Main Stream-Media and Hollywood. Using their own version of justifying the unjustifiable, and defending the indefensible, they will shamelessly divide the nation by race, gender, religion, class, and any other possibilities of creating friction.

Being historically racist, the Democrat Party must persist in repeating the big lie that Democrats are the ones that help blacks. What they have done successfully, with help from some liberal Republicans, is placing millions on the Democrat welfare plantation where their policies lay waste to millions of lives. Drug and crime infested ghettos fed by a culture of dependency and a corrupt education system, capture and securely hold generation after generation. By keeping them uneducated, poor, and dependent, Democrats wall off minorities and poor whites keeping them enslaved on government-run plantations and reservations.

The New Socialist Democrat Party has several automatic reset buttons when facts and events connive to reveal the truth about their past. When this happens, their blatant, illusions and lies stand starkly against clear, blue reality. That’s when they desperately reach for the buttons of racism, sexism, homophobia, xenophobia, class warfare, and religious division. Liberals use the fear of being called these names to chill speech. Let the epithets begin!

Truth will never fill the gullet of congenital or ideological liars. Likewise, it falls much too harshly on delicate liberal ears. Therefore, liberals result to pretense, lies, and pettifoggery combined with street riots, physicality, and thuggery to control thought and speech. Angry mobs shouting down truth don’t change the truth. Neither do the media, Hollywood, and Marxist ideologues’ change truth when they attempt to indoctrinate the masses. However, they use extraordinary means to bury it beneath an avalanche of fascist nonsense. 

From now until November, our streets and airways will exhibit the anti-American left fire every fraudulent, deceitful bullet from their big guns. Likewise, we will be regaled with every nonsensical, irrational notion dribbling from the little minds of the useful idiots.

In the next seven months, Democrats must convince minorities and women that Republicans hate them, while making everybody forget the sordid history Democrats have with blacks. Not to mention, Clinton and all the leftists must lie about the Marxist policies that keep most women and minorities poor and under the heel of government. As extraordinarily twisted as it sounds, Hillary and Company must repeatedly convince those on the plantations and those struggling low-income earners that they are lucky to have such caring Marxists on their side.

Yes, that’s correct. Hillary needs the votes of those she helped put on the plantations, so she can continue the policies to keep them there.

Turn on your truth meter, brace yourself, and hold on tight! With Clinton and Obama electioneering, your meter and your head just might explode.

Jim Mullen

https://twitter.com/freedomforusnow

https://www.facebook.com/jim.mullen.73

http://freedomforusnow.com/Page_8.php#Truth_meters...

Read more…

Benghazi's Other Victims

The mainstream media is loath to admit it but Hillary Clinton had a very bad day testifying before the Benghazi committee. When Congressman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) confronted the former Secretary of State with her own emails concerning the 2012 terrorist attack, Mrs. Clinton flailed gracelessly and backpedaled from previous statements.

The emails concern the motive for the attack and its perpetrators. It was never about “The Innocence of Muslims,” a Youtube video that portrayed the historical Mohammad as a truly villainous character. Nearly everyone now admits that the video did not spark the great Benghazi conflagration that left four Americans dead and a consulate in ruins—and by “everyone,” I mean members of the Obama Administration. It was like pulling teeth to get them to concede the point but they apparently have. Their current position is that they made an honest mistake in the Clausewitzian “fog of war.” As difficult as it was to defend the “honest mistake” narrative before Clinton’s emails were uncovered, it is now impossible—or at least it’s impossible for people who care about facts.

Three emails discovered on Mrs. Clinton’s illegal private email server—the one she wiped to stymie investigators—reveal that the secretary never believed the Youtube yarn for a moment. The night of the attack she confided in her daughter Chelsea via email that the compound had been besieged by an “al-Qaeda like group.” She said something similar to the president of Libya, and to Egyptian Prime Minister Hesham Qandil she wrote: “We know the attack in Libya had nothing to with the film. It was a planned attack not a protest.” These words were written approximately twenty-four hours after the attack.

Being the skilled liar that she is, Clinton actually tried to deny that she had ever claimed otherwise. Clearly it was a terrorist attack, not a spontaneous protest gone awry, and she had said so all along!

Okay, not really. On the night of the attack, she addressed the nation, saying:

“Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind.”

So there are two lies in that brief statement—that our government values religious tolerance (LOL!) and that the attack was spurred by a video. I’m sure her defenders, weasels that they are, will argue that Clinton never definitively blamed the video but only claimed that “some” sought to justify the attack on those grounds. Who those “some” are is unclear, especially when one considers that the rumor was spawned at the highest levels of the US government. In any case, it’s weak sauce. She was clearly blaming “The Innocence of Muslims,” just as the rest of the administration did. They had their talking points coordinated and they spoke with one voice—blame the video!

This new revelation should go a long way toward debunking the results of the sham investigation concluded last November which found the administration blameless. How anyone could have come to that conclusion without examining all the evidence is beyond me. They obviously never subpoenaed the secretary’s emails or they would have discovered, months before anyone else did, that Hillary was using a private, unsecured email server. They didn’t find any fault because they didn’t look very hard.

It would be prudent at this point for Mrs. Clinton and her former boss to apologize to the American public for misleading them. It’ll never happen, I know. But there’s another person, a non-American, who also deserves an apology. His name is Nakoula Bassely Nakoula and he produced the video under the pseudonym “Sam Bacile.” Mr. Nakoula was the administration’s sacrificial lamb led to the slaughter so that the administration could appease the mob, escape blame, and win reelection. Besides the four dead Americans and their families, of course, no one has suffered more than he.

When Mrs. Clinton attended the funeral of Tyrone Woods, a security contractor and former Navy SEAL who gave his life trying to hold back the angry hordes, she approached Charles Woods, the victim’s father, and told him that she would seek retribution—not against the barbarians who killed his son, of course, but against Nakoula Bassely Nakoula. According to Mr. Woods, Clinton said “We’re going to make sure that the person who made that film is arrested and prosecuted.” Yikes!

Nakoula was of course arrested and imprisoned just as Clinton promised he would be. I could hardly believe my eyes when I saw the picture of a man being hauled off by Los Angeles County sheriffs, his identity obscured behind a hat, a heavy buttoned-up coat, and what appears to be gauze across his face. It was another one of the many “They can’t do that in America!” moments that I’ve witnessed in recent years. Our government doesn’t jail people for making movies; or at least it’s not supposed to. That’s the kind of stuff you think happens only in places like China and Venezuela. It can’t happen here.

Oh, but it can and did. Granted, the man wasn’t charged with making an inflammatory film. He was charged with violating the terms of his probation, which forbad him, among other things, from using aliases. He also lied to the police about his involvement in the film. Both of his minor crimes can be understood as the actions of a man in fear for his life and those of his family.

I’m not so naïve as to believe that the charge was really the charge. It’s no coincidence that he was arrested just four days after the Benghazi attack though his video had been on Youtube for three months. His arrest and prosecution fulfilled Hillary Clinton’s promise to Charles Woods and appeased the Muslim world—at the expense of the first amendment, of course. Authorities had to find something to charge Nakoula with and minor probation violations were a good fit. Nakoula was sentenced to a year in prison.

What a disgraceful episode in American history. While no one in the government was obliged to defend the content of the video, someone should have stood up for our sacred freedoms. The current administration instead caved to the mob’s cries for vengeance. Barack Obama even appealed directly to Youtube, asking it to review the video to determine if it violated its terms of service, a clear suggestion that it should be removed. That’s too close to government censorship for my liking. To its credit, Youtube did not comply.

I was reminded of Nakoula again when I recently learned of Clinton’s 2010 meeting with the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) in Istanbul, where she promised to curb “Islamophobia” through the employment of “some old-fashioned techniques of peer pressure and shaming, so that people don’t feel that they have the support to do what we abhor.” The OIC advocates for laws that would criminalize criticism of Islam as illegal “defamation.” Clinton was essentially meeting them halfway, trying to demonstrate that the “defamation” they feared could be rooted out by softer forms of censorship.

If this doesn’t frighten you, it should. Government officials should never talk this way. While peer pressure and shaming may sound like constitutional methods for making people shut their pie holes, they can quickly devolve into first amendment violations when practiced by the government. The dustup over “The Innocence of Muslims” offers an excellent case in point. No, the government won’t jail a man for making a video—it will find a pretext and jail him for that instead. No, the government won’t order Youtube to censor the film—it will ask Youtube to review its terms of service in hopes of persuading someone else to censor it instead.

See? It’s all perfectly legal!

Nakoula Bassely Nakoula paid a price that no one in a free society should ever have to pay for making a film. The administration should have had some testicular fortitude and told the Muslim world where to stick it. But it did the cowardly thing instead, as you knew it would, and fed the ravenous alligators in hopes of being eaten last. The Benghazi attack’s death toll ought to include the names of four dead Americans, of course, but also the first amendment, which died a little that day in September 2012.

Read more…

This is part 2 of a five part series taken from my blog at whileweslept.org

Former Indiana Senator Evan Bayh once described the vetting process for high political office as ‘totally invasive… like having a colonoscopy, except they use the Hubble telescope on you.’ And he would certainly know, after being on the shortlist of VP candidates for Al Gore, John Kerry, and Barack Obama. By comparison the vetting process employed by the media and the American public is much less invasive but has the potential to be considerably more deadly. Consider the swift rise and abrupt collapse of Howard Dean’s candidacy back in 2004.

On December 9, 2003 Al Gore endorsed Howard Dean by saying, “I’m very proud and honored to endorse Howard Dean to be the next president of the United States of America..”

Al Gore’s endorsement was highly coveted, and CNN reported that it “could cement Dean’s status as the leading Democratic candidate….

On January 19 after placing third in the Iowa primary, Dean gave a passionate speech, saying:

“If you had told us one year ago that we were going to come in third in Iowa – well, we’d have given anything for that. And you know something, not only are we going to New Hampshire; we’re going to South Carolina, and Oklahoma and Arizona and North Dakota… and then we’re going to Washington D.C. and we’re going to take back the White House…”

And then it happened: he let out a cackly, off-pitched battle cry. Watching this clip now, more than a decade later, is nothing less than heartbreaking. He is standing there surrounded by flags and supporters in what for him was a pinnacle moment. It’s impossible not to feel sorry for this man who at the time had no idea that he was destroying his bid for the White House. There is no teleprompter. There are no speech notes. There is just Howard Dean – bright-eyed and fully charged with raw emotion. That battle cry, that joyful “hee-ya!” was all anyone needed to convict him, in their own minds, of a rabid lust for power.

That was just over ten years ago. Things have certainly changed. We are less than a year away from both Democrats and Republicans announcing their presidential candidates. Earlier this morning I came across an article about Hillary Clinton’s inevitable nomination that stated, “Unless she is indicted, she will surely win the Democratic nomination.”

Let’s reflect on that for a moment.

Amidst all of the allegations swirling around the Clinton campaign, I wonder if there is anything that could prove to be as damaging as Howard Dean’s Rebel Yell… Certainly Benghazi and the subsequent private server/email findings as well as the gross mishandling of classified material all should have been – not to mention the very real links to Hillary Clinton using the Clinton Foundation as a channel for terrorist nations and regimes to purchase backing from the State Department. Somehow it has all managed to withstand public scrutiny.  

For those of us who are old enough to vividly recall the scandalous years of the Clinton White House, this is beyond belief, yet not at all surprising. However, for the 93 million Millennials who will be able to cast a vote in 2016, who were born after ‘Billary’, the seriousness of understanding the Clinton standard of fraudulence cannot be understated. While she herself may regard her own history of ruthless and illicit conduct as “old news”, it is vital that we endeavor to apply the same ‘intrusive and rigorous’ vetting procedures to her just as we would to anyone else seeking the highest office in our land.

Even the most casual meandering through our recent history reveals a very real and disagreeable pattern – travelgate, whitewater, filegate, pardongate and the dozen or so others. These colorless terms certainly benefit the culprits by sounding trivial and easily discarded. I’m sure that most folks, given the opportunity, would prefer to hear about a sex scandal over one involving the White House travel office. However, when held to proper scrutiny, these scandals reveal a consistently contemptuous, underhanded, self-serving, and dangerous political duo that are eerily comparable to Frank and Claire Underwood in House of Cards.

While campaigning for the Presidency in 1992, Bill Clinton remarked that by voting him into the White House, America would be getting ‘two for the price of one’ in reference to the role Hillary would play in his administration. At the time, such an admission was certainly provocative, even exciting to our nation. It had been less than a generation since the integration of the Feminist Movement into our collective principles.

Four months into their Presidency, the first of more than a dozen public scandals, Travelgate, surfaced. Four months after the Clintons took office, they announced that they would be firing all seven of the employees in the White House office that arranges travel for the media and first family. Though it may seem inconsequential to most, this announcement was particularly striking to the media and Washington insiders. These seven employees had faithfully served the administrations of seven Presidents – Republican and Democrat alike – and were well-known, respected civil servants.

After reportedly denying longtime Clinton business acquaintance Harry Thomason access to the White House charter business (worth 31 billion dollars annually), Travel Office Director Billy Dale was promptly locked out of his office while officers removed several boxes of paperwork.

Shortly after being allowed back into his office Mr. Dale was told that he, along with the six others who comprised the travel office team, had been fired for criminal misconduct. Additionally, he was slapped with a lawsuit for allegedly embezzling fourteen thousand dollars because the logs were ‘missing’. Also during this time, out of pure coincidence I’m sure, Mr. Dale received a letter from the IRS informing him that was to be audited, and for the next thirty months he was investigated. His son and daughter were subpoenaed. As the case went to trial in the fall of 1995, a long line of Washington journalists volunteered to serve as character witnesses to Mr. Dale. The jury needed less than two hours to reach a verdict of not-guilty.

Though the final report found that Mrs. Clinton’s sworn statement was ‘factually inaccurate’ and that she had indeed spoken with Harry Thomason on numerous occasions regarding his takeover of the travel office, Billy Dale did not get his job back despite being only a few months away from retirement. Further investigations by the FBI, Department of Justice, and The House Oversight Committee scrutinized Hillary Clinton for playing a central role in this debacle and for making false statements under oath.

The methods administered by Hillary Clinton – the whimsical misuse of law enforcement authority while dragging someone’s reputation and family through the mud in retribution for having been inconvenienced – are contemptible and terrifying.

In that same year, Mrs. Clinton had hired Craig Livingstone for the position of Director of White House Security and given him the highest security clearance despite lacking any sort of high-level security experience – unless you would count working as a bouncer in a D.C. nightclub as sufficient.

While investigating the Travelgate catastrophe, the House Committee on Government Reform and Oversight had found that some 900 unauthorized FBI background reports had been pulled by Livingstone at the request of Mrs. Clinton. The FBI files covered White House employees from Republican administrations and then current political adversaries. The Director of the FBI acknowledged this as an “egregious violation of privacy”, as the files contained detailed information about such things as extramarital affairs and personal medical problems. The politics of personal destruction made easy by improperly obtained, private files of political rivals to be used for professional gain.

The House Oversight Committee ordered an investigation on September 24, 1996 to determine if the events surrounding the files were “a blunder, the result of colossal incompetence, or whether they are established to be more serious or even criminal.” During the investigation the FBI learned that Craig Livingstone – the man who had obtained the files at her request – was the son of a friend of Hillary Clinton’s. They had managed to find photographs with Mrs. Clinton and Mrs. Livingstone. Hillary maintains that she doesn’t know her and that she had nothing to do with hiring Mr. Livingstone. Following this debacle, the FBI closed its White House Liaison Office after more than thirty years of service to seven presidents.  

Also in July of 1993, Bill Clinton fired FBI Director William Sessions. This was the first time that an FBI Director had been fired by a President. Clinton-appointed Attorney General Janet Reno said that Sessions had exhibited some “serious deficiencies in judgement” by using an FBI plane to visit his daughter on several occasions. Sessions denied that he had acted improperly and refused to give a letter of resignation. On the 19th, Clinton used his powers to dismiss him immediately.

The very next day, Vincent Foster – long-time friend, coworker and confidant of Hillary Clinton and then current Deputy White House Council – was found dead in a federal park in Virginia. He’d been shot in the head. Due to the recent vacancy of FBI Director, the park police were assigned to handle the case. The park police had certainly never dealt with a case of this magnitude and were vastly unqualified. The official position was that Foster, who had recently been prescribed a suspect dosage of trazodone for insomnia and depression, had killed himself.

After searching his briefcase a full three days later, a suicide note did turn up. It had been torn into twenty-eight pieces, of which twenty-seven were recovered. There were no fingerprints to be found. After examining the remaining pieces forensic experts agreed that the ‘note’ was a fake.

A few months later, a White House volunteer intern named Kathleen Willey nervously made claims to other White House staffers that President Bill Clinton had kissed and groped her during a private meeting regarding the possibility of Willey joining the permanent White House staff in the Oval Office. The alleged encounter occurred on November 29. Hours after her meeting with Clinton concluded, her husband Edward Willey committed suicide over a large debt. Another puzzling coincidence, I’m sure. The Clintons again escaped any sort of charges. The final report of the U.S. Office of Independent Council reads – “Willey and President Clinton are the only direct witnesses to their meeting, and their accounts differ substantially on the crucial facts of what occurred”.

These situations all end in a similar fashion: due to a lack of evidence the final verdict comes down to a ‘your word versus mine’ scenario. While digging through this ‘old news’, I often wonder what Mrs. Clinton and our media would have to say about these wrongdoings if they involved, say, a Republican Senator from Texas or a conservative Governor from Florida. Would they even be allowed the opportunity to run any sort of campaign, let alone one for the highest office in the land?

Over the years, time and time again when publically addressing her innocence in any one of these scandals the narrative changes from her involvement in them to how she responds to being asked about them. Instead of realizing and reflecting on the kind of character that emerges from the connecting of these innumerable dots, we instead hear about how she is “unflappable”, that “the real message is her attitude and poise” and that her “confiding tone and relaxed body language immediately draws approving reviews”.

And now, when people in her own party and large segments of the electorate describe her as “a terrible candidate”, “not easy to trust”, and Secret Service members consider it a punishment to be assigned to her detail because she is so foul and mean-spirited, it is crucial to remember that Hillary Clinton is the first First Lady to come under criminal investigation – not once – but several times.

There is a deeply troubling standard that arises even when considering these accounts individually, but when they are assembled into a timeline we are confronted with the fact that when a Clinton is granted a position of influence we really do get “two for the price of one”.  

Read more…

This is part one of a five part piece taken from my blog at whileweslept.org

As the tide of political correctness rolls over our nation there are millions of Americans who will wear their vote as a civic crown of acceptance; of broad-mindedness. Just as a vote for Barack Obama seven years ago was seen as an exclusive gesture of modernity by pronouncing our transcendence of race, this election may well be the same for gender. The landscape seems to have been assembled with that in mind.

Let us realize that for over thirty years Hillary Clinton has been the beneficiary of the American public’s short-sighted memory. And now, as she hopscotches her way into position as the front-runner for the Democratic Party it is important the we look objectively at the trail of wreckage that both she and her husband have left behind.

Has there ever been a Presidential candidate so mired in controversy? For example, as I write this, despite the preponderance of evidence that during her time serving as Secretary of State she broke a number of federal laws – regarding the handling of classified material as well as operating on a personal server instead of the required government appointed one – there are still millions of people who seem to regard the Oval Office as Mrs. Clinton’s just reward for her long pursuit of it.

Many people who may vote in the democratic primary election and the general election in 2016 have no genuine knowledge of Mrs. Clinton. Millions of first-time voters will not remember the dozens of prior scandals that date back to the late-seventies. As the public’s critical vetting of a candidate has been reduced to an embarrassing confluence of smack-down banter and feckless mudslinging many have lost sight of Hillary Clinton’s sustained tradition of using felonious methods to further her own self-interest.

For those of us who remember headlines like ‘Travelgate’, ‘Filegate’ and ‘Whitewater’ this will serve as a reminder; for those whose image of her is a convoluted knot of sound-bytes about the ‘middle class’ and ‘college loans’, this will exhibit a forty year quest by an arrogant, sanctimonious, and reckless collectivist who has created inexhaustible resources through deceit and treacherous means.  

Surely, most potential voters are likely to associate Hillary with Benghazi but what does it mean? During a recent conversation with a lifelong Democrat and Clinton supporter I asked what she thought about what happened in Benghazi: “C’mon, it’s just like everything that happens over there.”

Actually, it isn’t.

It is in fact, a grotesque and criminally negligent mishandling of a terrorist attack that occurred on the eleventh anniversary of the World Trade Center attacks. On September 11, 2012 a group of Islamist militants launched an organized attack the American Consulate. Chris Stevens had been appointed to Ambassador just two months prior to the attack. Upon his arrival in Benghazi he’d asked for an additional 13 security guards citing the increasingly dangerous situation on the ground. His request went unanswered. 5 weeks prior to attack, Ambassador Stevens sent an urgent cable to Hillary Clinton personally requesting a protective detail bodyguard. Three days later, Hillary Clinton ordered the removal of his entire security team. In fact, there were hundreds of messages sent to the State Department and to Mrs. Clinton personally describing how Al-Qaeda militias had been patrolling the area around the Benghazi Consulate. There had been as assassination attempt on the British Ambassador nearby. In April of 2012, terrorists threw an IED (improvised explosive device) over the Consulate wall. In June of that same year terrorists blew a large hole in the Consulate gate.

At the onset of the attack on September 11, 2012 newly appointed Ambassador Chris Stevens and State Department Information Manager Sean Smith become separated from their meager security. They take refuge in the main building of the compound behind a fortified door with metal bars but the militants set fire to the building. Shortly thereafter, Ambassador Stevens is captured. He is raped and tortured before being killed. His body is dragged through the streets. Sean Smith dies of asphyxia caused by smoke inhalation.

A militant group advocating the strict implementation of Sharia law across all of Libya – Ansar al-Sharia – claims credit for the attack.

Around this time a U.S. surveillance drone arrives over the compound. It sends real-time footage back to the White House, the State Department and the CIA.

About a mile from the Consulate Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty (both former Navy Seals) were at the CIA Annex when the attack began. They radioed to their higher headquarters asking for permission to help and they were denied per the State Department. Also nearby, a Foreign Emergency Support team trained specifically for when a Consulate comes under terrorist attack had been deployed – but was held back by the State Department under the direction of Hillary Clinton. CIA officers on the ground nearby during the attack sent three separate requests for help but those, too, were denied. Woods and Doherty waited another hour and sent another request that was immediately denied. In a devastating exhibit of heroism, while knowingly disobeying their orders, they made their way to the Consulate to help. They requested air support. They called for ground support. The fighting went on for more than six hours with an unarmed drone hanging in the sky directly above them. Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods were killed by a mortar shell nearly seven hours after the fight began. One of them was on the roof with a laser pointer on the mortar team – that laser could have helped guide in an armed drone easily. Tyrone’s body was found slumped over his machine gun.

Eight minutes after Doherty and Woods were killed Hillary Clinton issued an official statement in which she claims that the attack was a spontaneous response to ‘inflammatory material posted on the internet” and not a planned terrorist attack. The alleged ‘inflammatory material’ turned out to be a low budget satirical depiction of the early life of Muhammad.  

Two days later, as Doherty and Woods were returned to the U.S. in boxes, Obama again blamed the attack on this internet video. Hillary Clinton told Charles Woods, the father of Tyrone, “We will make sure the person who made that film is arrested and prosecuted” and indeed the filmmaker was jailed. On September 20 the White House began airing apology ads for the internet video – apology ads.

This is the story the precedes the current email scandal.

Perhaps that according to Mrs. Clinton is another attempt by the ‘vast right wing conspiracy’ to knock her off from her pedestal.  

Perhaps you have scrolled through various headlines reporting on recent developments in this ongoing email scandal that alleges that while Clinton was Secretary of State she operated her communications through a private email server instead of the government-issued server. An email scandal may not have a dire ring to it – unless of course, the emails and files that were deliberately scrubbed from Mrs. Clinton’s private server contained detailed information regarding the illegal shipment of millions of dollars of arms to terrorist cells operating in Syria, Qatar, Libya, and Turkey.

In 2011 then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton with the aid of President Obama authorized the sale of literally hundreds of millions of dollars in arms to the government of Qatar which then, at their request, were sold and given to Libyan and Syrian rebel groups in the hopes that these rebels would overthrow their governments. It is a chilling fact that the Libyan rebels who attacked the American Consulate in Benghazi did so with weapons procured from Mrs. Clinton’s State Department.

This is what all the headlines spring from. The irritating banter from the ‘vast right wing conspiracy’ that Mrs. Clinton has been advancing for so many years has been brought on by her own criminal arrogance.  

The State Department has the power to authorize the sale of weapons to other countries and organizations. They can also declare a country or state a terrorist nation, in which case the selling of arms to these nations would be a felony. However, Libya and Syria were on the U.S. terror list hence the sale of weapons to them is a felony. This is where Hillary’s private server comes into play. If Hillary Clinton had been conducting business as the U.S. Secretary of State on her government-issued email address (you know, ending in .gov instead of clintonemail.com) then her emails would have been subject to the Freedom of Information Act. That means that anyone can access them at any time through the proper legal channels. Government servers are encrypted and backed up regularly. Her personal email address had no encryption, meaning that it is safe to assume that the rumors alleging that both Russia and China had hacked her email account years ago are true.

By mandate, all electronic government communication is copied, stored and backed up. Since Mrs. Clinton was running her email through a personal server her communications were completely off the grid.

In fact, her tenure as Secretary of State enriched more than Syrian rebels and terrorist cells from Qatar. Though it is against the law to pay an government employee like a Secretary of State directly for any services, Hillary Clinton found a convenient loophole by using The Clinton Foundation as well as payments made to her husband Bill for ‘speaking engagements’. Isn’t it curious that in 2011 the Kuwait American Foundation wanted to buy arms from Boeing and shortly thereafter Bill Clinton gets paid 175,000 dollars by that very same foundation for giving a forty-five minute speech at a gala event. Quite suddenly, Kuwait is no longer considered a terrorist nation – so it is absolutely safe to sell weapons to them. In that same year, Bill Clinton is paid 625,000 dollars to speak at an event put on by Goldman Sachs (one of the largest donors to Hillary’s 2016 campaign). Two days later Goldman Sachs is awarded a contract to sell arms to Algeria; arms that would aid in the human trafficking industry. At the time Senator Richard Luger noticed these parallels and reported it to the media, who promptly tossed the story in the dustbin of history. Let us not forget that it is our job to discover who our ‘public servants’ really are. Hillary Clinton is banking on the notion that you won’t. 

 

Read more…

By Craig Andresen – The National Patriot and Right Side Patriots on cprworldwidemedia.net

delete-1.jpg?width=230When you are a presidential candidate, and you have a super PAC called…”Correct the Record” you have a problem, in that if said candidate had a clear and transparent record, it would not need correcting by those with a particular bias.

Hillary Clinton IS a presidential candidate, for the time being, and SHE has a super PAC called “Correct the Record.”

Hillary Clinton has a problem and it’s getting worse by the day.

According to State department spokespeople, given the fact that 4 of the first 40 emails an Inspector General looked at…contained classified material. Subsequently, many more were discovered to contain classified material and now, those spokespeople are telling us that HUNDREDS of pieces of classified material are most likely contained in even MORE of Hillary’s private server…private email account emails.

That is what we already knew but here is where the “it gets worse” comes in…

According to a former operations officer for the U.S. Army in Europe and former operations officer for the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Willes Lee, a man who knows how such things work…“It is hard to move classified documents into the non-classified system. You couldn’t move a document by mistake.” In other words…classified material carries a specific designation or marker that makes it all but impossible to transfer from a secured, government approved server or email account to one which is unsecured and private…like Hillary Clinton’s servers and email accounts.

Clinton, for her part, continues to claim that none of those emails containing classified information were MARKED as classified when she either received or sent them.

Oh really?

READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE!!!

Read more…

 

Hillary Clinton has stated that of the 60,000 emails she exchanged as Secretary of State half or 30,000 were personal. Randall Sorensen, CPA decided to provide Hillary’s boss, the taxpayers with the estimated cost of her lost work productivity. Based on her salary and workplace statistics, Hillary’s emails cost taxpayers $125,000

Hillary Clinton’s private server will confirm for the FBI whether any classified information was inadvertently passed.  The server will also provide an exact timeline of her emails.  Randall Sorensen, CPA and Certified in Financial Forensics decided to determine how much Hillary’s personal emails cost American taxpayers.    

Mr. Sorensen reviewed Hillary’s tax returns for years 2009 through 2012 and found that as Secretary of State she was paid an average annual salary of $158,000.  Presidential candidate tax returns can be viewed at www.taxhisory.org.  Also, according to the CATO Institute the average federal worker receives an additional 42% in fringe benefits ($34,000 avg. ben/$81,000 avg. pay).  When you multiply her annual salary of $158,000 by 142%, Hillary’s annual cost to taxpayers was $224,000. www.downsizinggovernment.org/overpaid-federal-workers.

Next, Sorensen relied on the McKinsey Global Institute regarding the amount of time worker’s spend on emails. MGI’s research shows employees spend up to 28% of their day on emails. www.mckinsey.com/insights/high_tech_telecoms_internet/the_social_economy

Therefore, if you multiply Hillary’s annual wages and benefits of $224,000 times 28%, the effective cost to taxpayers for her to read and send emails was $62,700.  Since Hillary has stated that 50% (30,000 of 60,000) were personal we would need to multiply $62,700 by 50% for a net cost to her boss, the taxpayers, of $31,350.  Multiplying $31,350 times four years as Secretary you arrive at a rather staggering cost of cost of $125,000.

Mr. Sorensen said tongue in cheek, “imagine walking into your boss’s office tomorrow and announcing that you plan to prepare 30,000 personal emails over the next four years at a cost to the company of $125,000 and you expect them to pay for it”.   Before attempting this, Sorensen stated “I recommend that your boss have a good sense of humor to prevent your sudden unemployment”.

In summary, Hillary’s urgency to instantly contact a loved one or repairman is human nature. The content of Hillary’s personal emails isn’t any business of the rest of the world…..   except maybe when you’re the Secretary of State and your being compensated by hard working taxpayers. Hillary should be applauded for teaching us all a valuable lesson…….     emails can and will come back to bite you!

Read more…

By Oscar Y. Harward

 

‘Freedom of the Press’ is a ‘Right’ giving Medias openness in preventing a tyrannical federal government from destroying our freedoms; not is co-opting and directing a left-wing political party.

 

There are many references in recent years where impious worms within the ‘Main-stream’ Medias have exposed themselves; coming out of their own decays; rather than exposing corruption(s) within our government.

 

The more current exposure is now showing as ABC News Anchor George Stephanopoulos displays his political partisanship by donating $75,000 to the Clinton Foundation but failing to report this ‘partisan’ gift even to his ABC bosses or anyone else.

 

Stephanopoulos continues his support of Democrat Party’s Presidential candidate and former Sec. of State Hillary Clinton, who most likely violated US Code multiple times; time will tell.  Stephanopoulos chastises Republicans and others for questioning Hillary’s ‘quid pro quo’.  Stephanopoulos says Hillary Clinton did not violate any laws. 

 

What is worse within Stephanopoulos’s hidden support of the Clintons, Stephanopoulos sought to moderate the 2016 GOP Presidential Primary debates; even though he shows his dislike for Republicans.  With Stephanopoulos as Moderator, he may be capable in swaying American voters to his own left-wing schemas.

 

For these reasons, George Stephanopoulos must be removed and fired.

Read more…

4064098826?profile=original

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3f01MDEGXP4

 

  1. It appears Hillary Clinton is continuing her 2016 Presidential campaign and maintaining her support for women as if men are/were restricting her; whereas, Hillary Clinton’s own female employees in her Senate office were paid less than men.

     

  2. As we learned last week in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech to Congress, it may be that President Obama and his administration may be close to agreeing with Iran on a very dangerous agreement; allowing Iran to have a nuclear bomb, and many of them.

     

    Former Sec. of State, Hillary Clinton criticizes Senate Republicans for submitting a warning letter to Iran.  After several years of Iranian lies after other failed negotiations on Iran’s nuclear program, Senate Republicans may have been warning Iran’s officials that even if President Obama and his Senate Democrats will not protect America and the State of Israel, Senate Republicans will.

     

    It appears Hillary Clinton is in step with President Obama, his State Department team, and most Capitol Hill Democrats in an effort to support  Iran, the world’s worst government supporting ‘TERRORISTS’ groups and, perhaps, determined to destroy the State of Israel. Americans must remember how the 2012 Democrat National Committee (DNC) Delegates and Alternates at the Charlotte, NC Convention voted to reject the word ‘God’ and ‘Jerusalem’ as the Capitol of the State of Israel, into the National Democrat Party’s Platform.

     

    President Obama must/should never be allowed to use or share any US military equipment or other armed forces, in any way against any US allies, and more specifically the State of Israel.

     

  3. Hillary Clinton must have forgotten her own 2007 speech of ‘illegal’ E-mails. http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/03/flashback-hillary-attacks-bush-officials-for-secret-email-accounts-video/    

     

  4. Hillary Clinton ‘chose’ to ‘deny or reject’ a ‘secure’ US State Department E-mail setup while using what appears to be an ‘unsecure’ E-mail server setup.  Hillary Clinton’s decision may have allowed enemy nations and other ‘terrorists’ Islamic groups to see and read any and/or all non-secured E-mails.

     

  5. By setting up her own personal E-mail server system, Hillary Clinton controlled any and all information that was, or was not, transferred and copied at the State Department.  You may see that Hillary Clinton addresses that these copies were all job related.  She is confirming her total control of all E-mails of what she decided as to what the State Department receives.

     

  6. Hillary Clinton clarifies that the State Department delivered some 55,000 E-mails upon request or demand; all as she says were work related.  Hillary Clinton believes we should trust her on all.  She is not in a position for her to determine all E-mails as to whether E-mails are job related or personal and/or what were put on her own personal E-mail server system and going to the State Department.  She must understand these entire job related E-mails are not to be determined to her.  All E-mails must be confirmed by others whether these E-mails are work related or personal.

     

  7. Here again, Hillary Clinton is saying she asked the State Department to release all job related E-mails.  Again, all E-mails received to the State Department were only what E-mails she would release to the State Department from her own E-mail server system.

     

  8. While Hillary Clinton says she is so proud of her work as Secretary of State, this means she must be so proud of employing members of al-Qaeda for the ‘security’ at the Benghazi, Libya Embassy facility where as US Ambassador and 3 others died.

     

  9. Mrs. Clinton, convenience may have cost the lives of our US Ambassador and 3 others Americans. When any and all Americans are at risk for your personal convenience, your service is a disgrace to our State Department, the White House, and to all of America and our citizens.

     

  10. What may be even worse, Mrs. Clinton, Americans have no idea as to how much of your personal convenience may have provided national security information to other ‘terrorists’ Islamic Muslim groups.        

Read more…

ISLAM OUR ENEMY??

THIS IS SO SCAREY. READ THE WHOLE THING

WE TRUE AMERICANS ARE REALLY BLESSED..


Islam our Enemy??

Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond's book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The
Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat

Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it is a
Complete, total, 100% system of life.

Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and military
Components. The religious component is a beard for all of the other
Components.

Islamization begins when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to
Agitate for their religious privileges.

When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree
To Muslim demands for their religious privileges, some of the other
Components tend to creep in as well.

Here's how it works:

As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given
Country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving
Minority, and not as a threat to other citizens. This is the case in:

United States -- Muslim 0.6%
Australia -- Muslim 1.5%
Canada -- Muslim 1.9%
China -- Muslim 1.8%
Italy -- Muslim 1.5%
Norway -- Muslim 1.8%

At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and
Disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among
Street gangs. This is happening in:

Denmark -- Muslim 2%
Germany -- Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom -- Muslim 2.7%
Spain -- Muslim 4%
Thailand -- Muslim 4.6%

From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their
Percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the
Introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing
Food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on
Supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves -- along with threats
For failure to comply. This is occurring in:

France -- Muslim 8%
Philippines -- 5%
Sweden -- Muslim 5%
Switzerland -- Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands -- Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago -- Muslim 5.8%

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to
Rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The
Ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase
Lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris, we are
Already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam and results
In uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam , with opposition to Mohammed
Cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly
In Muslim sections in:

Guyana -- Muslim 10%
India -- Muslim 13.4%
Israel -- Muslim 16%
Kenya -- Muslim 10%
Russia -- Muslim 15%

After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia
Formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and
Jewish synagogues, such as in:

Ethiopia -- Muslim 32.8%

At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks,
And ongoing militia warfare, such as in:

Bosnia -- Muslim 40%
Chad -- Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon -- Muslim 59.7%

From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all
Other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic
Cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax
Placed on infidels, such as in:

Albania -- Muslim 70%
Malaysia -- Muslim 60.4%
Qatar -- Muslim 77.5%
Sudan -- Muslim 70%

After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run
Ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the
Infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been experienced and in
Some ways is on-going in:

Bangladesh -- Muslim 83%
Egypt -- Muslim 90%
Gaza -- Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia -- Muslim 86.1%
Iran -- Muslim 98%
Iraq -- Muslim 97%
Jordan -- Muslim 92%
Morocco -- Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan -- Muslim 97%
Palestine -- Muslim 99%
Syria -- Muslim 90%
Tajikistan -- Muslim 90%
Turkey -- Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates -- Muslim 96%

100% will usher in the peace of 'Dar-es-Salaam' -- the Islamic House of
Peace. Here there's supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the
Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such as in:

Afghanistan -- Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia -- Muslim 100%
Somalia -- Muslim 100%
Yemen -- Muslim 100%

Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states the most
radical Muslims intimidate and spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust by
killing less radical Muslims, for a variety of reasons.

'Before I was nine, I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me
against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against
my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; the tribe against the
world, and all of us against the infidel. -- Leon Uris, 'The Haj'

It is important to understand that in some countries, with well under 100%
Muslim populations, such as France, the minority Muslim populations live in
ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and within which they live by
Sharia Law. The national police do not even enter these ghettos. There are
no national courts, nor schools, nor non-Muslim religious facilities. In
such situations, Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. The
children attend madrasses. They learn only the Koran. To even associate with
an infidel is a crime punishable with death. Therefore, in some areas of
certain nations, Muslim Imams and extremists exercise more power than the
national average would indicate.

Today's 1.5 billion Muslims make up 22% of the world's population. But
their birth rates dwarf the birth rates of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists,
Jews, and all other believers. Muslims will exceed 50% of the world's
population by the end of this century.

Well, boys and girls, today we are letting the fox guard the henhouse. The
wolves will be herding the sheep!

Obama appoints two devout Muslims to Homeland Security posts. Doesn't this
make you feel safer already?

Obama and Janet Napolitano appoint Arif Alikhan, a devout Muslim, as
Assistant Secretary for Policy Development.

DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano swore in Kareem Shora, a devout Muslim who
was born in Damascus , Syria , as ADC National Executive Director as a
member of the Homeland Security Advisory Council (HSAC).

NOTE: Has anyone ever heard a new government official being identified as a
devout Catholic, a devout Jew or a devout Protestant...? Just wondering.

Devout Muslims being appointed to critical Homeland Security positions?
Doesn't this make you feel safer already??

That should make the US ' homeland much safer, huh!! Was it not "Devout
Muslim men" that flew planes into U.S. buildings 8 years ago?

Was it not a Devout Muslim who killed 13 at Fort Hood ?

Also: This is very interesting and we all need to read it from start to
finish. Maybe this is why our American Muslims are so quiet and not speaking
out about any atrocities. Can a good Muslim be a good American? This
question was forwarded to a friend who worked in Saudi Arabia for 20 years
The following is his reply:

Theologically - no . . . Because his allegiance is to Allah, The moon God of
Arabia. Religiously - no. Because no other religion is accepted by His Allah
except Islam (Quran, 2:256)(Koran).

Scripturally - no. Because his allegiance is to the five Pillars of Islam
and the Quran.
Geographically - no. Because his allegiance is to Mecca , to which he turns
in prayer five times a day.

Socially - no. Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends
with Christians or Jews.

Politically - no. Because he must submit to the mullahs (spiritual leaders),
who teach annihilation of Israel and destruction of America , the great
Satan.

Domestically - no. Because he is instructed to marry four Women and beat and
scourge his wife when she disobeys him (Quran4:34).

Intellectually - no. Because he cannot accept the American Constitution
since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be
corrupt.

Philosophically - no. Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran do not allow
freedom of religion and expression.. Democracy and Islam cannot co-exist.
Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic.

Spiritually - no. Because when we declare 'one nation under God,' the
Christian's God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as
Heavenly father, nor is he ever called love in The Quran's 99 excellent
names.

Therefore, after much study and deliberation.... Perhaps we should be very
suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS in this country. - - - They obviously cannot be
both 'good' Muslims and good Americans. Call it what you wish, it's still
the truth. You had better believe it. The more who understand this, the
better it will be for our country and our future. The religious war is
bigger than we know or understand.

Can a Muslim be a good soldier???

Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, opened fire at Ft. Hood and Killed 13. He is a
good Muslim!!!

Footnote: The Muslims have said they will destroy us from within. So look in the

Congress and the white house today.

SO FREEDOM IS NOT FREE.

ANNE L. BRENNAN

Read more…

OBAMA: THE UNANSWERED MYSTERY OF THE CENTURY

This came from a union guy in Chicago who didn't vote for Obama. Very curious perspective that I never thought of in this light.

It will be interesting to see what they put in his "Presidential Library" about his early years, when he is out of office.

In a country where we take notice of many, many facets of our public figures' lives, doesn't seem odd that there's so little we know about our current president, Barack Obama.

For example, we know that Andrew Jackson's wife smoked a corn cob pipe and was accused of adultery; Abe Lincoln never went to school; Jack Kennedy wore a back brace; Harry Truman played the piano.

As Americans, we enjoy knowing details about our newsmakers, but none of us know one single humanizing fact about the history of our own president.

We are all aware of the lack of uncontestable birth records for Obama; that document managing has been spectacularly successful.

There are however, several additional oddities in Obama's history that appear to be as well managed as the birthing issue.

One other unusual item... there are no birth certificates of his daughters that can be found?

It is strange that no one who ever dated him has shown up. The charisma that caused women to be drawn to him so strongly during his campaign, certainly would, in the normal course of events, lead some lady to come forward, if only to garner some attention for herself. We all know about JFK's magnetism, that McCain was no monk and quite a few details about Palin's courtship and even her athletic prowess. Joe Biden's aneurisms and hair plugs are no secret; look at Cheney and Clinton, we know about their heart problems. Certainly Wild Bill Clinton's exploits before and during his White House years, were well known. That's why it's so odd, that not one lady has stepped up and said, "He was so-oo shy..." or "What a great dancer..."

It's virtually impossible to know anything about this fellow.

Who was the best man at his wedding? Start there. Then check groomsmen.

Then get the footage of the graduation ceremony. Has anyone talked to the professors? It is odd that no one is bragging that they knew him or taught him or lived with him.

When did he meet Michele, and how? Are there photos? Every president gives to the public all their photos, etc. for their library. What has he released? And who in hell voted for him to be the most popular man in 2010? Doesn't this make you wonder?

Ever wonder why no one ever came forward from President Obama's past saying they knew him, attended school with him, was his friend and so on?

Not one person has ever come forward from his past.

It certainly is very, very intriguing.

This should be a cause for great concern. To those who voted for him, you may have elected an unqualified, inexperienced shadow man. Have you seen a movie named "The Manchurian Candidate"

As insignificant as each of us might be, someone with whom we went to school will remember our name or face, someone will remember we were the clown or the dork or the brain or the quiet one or the bully or something about us.

George Stephanopoulos of ABC News said the same thing during the 2008 campaign. He questions why no one has acknowledged the president was in their classroom or ate in the same cafeteria or made impromptu speeches on campus. Stephanopoulos also was a classmate of Obama at Columbia -- the class of 1984. He says he never had a single class with him.

If he is such a great orator, why doesn't anyone in Obama's college class remember him? Why won't he allow Columbia to release his records?

Nobody remembers Obama at Columbia University.

Looking for evidence of Obama's past, Fox News contacted 400 Columbia University students from the period when Obama claims to have been there... but none remembered him.

Wayne Allyn Root was, like Obama, a Political Science major at Columbia, who also graduated in 1983. In 2008, Root said of Obama, "I don't know a single person at Columbia that knew him and they all know me. I don't have a classmate who ever knew Barack Obama at Columbia, ever."

Nobody recalls him. Root adds that he was also, like Obama, Class of '83 Political Science, and says, "You don't get more exact or closer than that. Never met him in my life, don't know anyone who ever met him. At the class reunion, our 20th reunion five years ago, who was asked to be the speaker of the class? Me. No one ever heard of Barack! And five years ago, nobody even knew who he was. The guy who writes the class notes, who's kind of, as we say in New York , 'the macha' who knows everybody, has yet to find a person, a human who ever met him."

Obama's photograph does not appear in the school's yearbook and Obama consistently declines requests to talk about his years at Columbia, provide school records, or provide the name of any former classmates or friends while at Columbia.

Some other interesting questions:

Why was Obama's law license inactivated in 2002?
It is said there is no record of him ever taking the Bar exam.

Why was Michelle's law license inactivated by court order?
We understand that was forced, in order to avoid criminal fraud charges.

It is circulating that, according to the U.S. Census, there is only one Barack Obama, but 27 Social Security numbers and over 80 aliases connected to him.

The Social Security number he uses now, originated in Connecticut, where he is never reported to have lived. It was originally registered to another man (Thomas Louis Wood) from Connecticut, who died in Hawaii while on vacation there.

As we all know, Social Security Numbers are only issued 'once, they are not re-used'

No wonder all his records are sealed!

Please continue share this with everyone. Somewhere, someone had to know him in school...before he "reorganized" Chicago and burst upon the Scene at the 2004 Democratic Convention.

Read more…

by COL. ROBERT F. CUNNINGHAM and PATRICK RISHOR, The Gilmer Mirror Quit trashing Obama's accomplishments. He has done more than any other President before him. Here is a list of his impressive accomplishments: First President to be photographed smoking a joint. First President to apply for college aid as a foreign student, then deny he was a foreigner. First President to have a social security number from a state he has never lived in. First President to preside over a cut to the credit-rating of the United States . First President to violate the War Powers Act. First President to be held in contempt of court for illegally obstructing oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico . First President to require all Americans to purchase a product from a third party. First President to spend a trillion dollars on "shovel-ready" jobs when there was no such thing as "shovel-ready" jobs. First President to abrogate bankruptcy law to turn over control of companies to his union supporters. First President to by-pass Congress and implement the Dream Act through executive fiat. First President to order a secret amnesty program that stopped the deportation of illegal immigrants across the U.S. , including those with criminal convictions. First President to demand a company hand-over $20 billion to one of his political appointees. First President to tell a CEO of a major corporation (Chrysler) to resign. First President to terminate America ’s ability to put a man in space. First President to cancel the National Day of Prayer and to say that America is no longer a Christian nation. First President to have a law signed by an auto-pen without being present. First President to arbitrarily declare an existing law unconstitutional and refuse to enforce it. First President to threaten insurance companies if they publicly spoke out on the reasons for their rate increases. First President to tell a major manufacturing company in which state it is allowed to locate a factory. First President to file lawsuits against the states he swore an oath to protect - (AZ, WI, OH, IN). First President to withdraw an existing coal permit that had been properly issued years ago. First President to actively try to bankrupt an American industry - (coal). First President to fire an inspector general of AmeriCorps for catching one of his friends in a corruption case. First President to appoint 45 czars to replace elected officials in his office. First President to surround himself with radical left wing anarchists. First President to golf more than 150 separate times in his five years in office. First President to hide his birth, medical, educational and travel records. First President to win a Nobel Peace Prize for doing NOTHING to earn it. First President to go on multiple "global apology tours" and concurrent "insult our friends" tours. First President to go on over 17 lavish vacations, in addition to date nights and Wednesday evening White House parties for his friends, paid for by the taxpayers. First President to have personal servants taxpayer funded) for his wife. First President to keep a dog trainer on retainer for $102,000 a year at taxpayer expense. First President to fly in a personal trainer from Chicago at least once a week at taxpayer expense. First President to repeat the Quran and tell us the early morning call of the Azan (Islamic call to worship) is the most beautiful sound on earth. First President to side with a foreign nation over one of the American 50 states - ( Mexico vs Arizona ). First President to tell the military men and women that they should pay for their own private insurance because they "volunteered to go to war and knew the consequences." Finally, he was the First President to tell the members of the military that THEY were UNPATRIOTIC for balking at the last suggestion. It's hard to comprehend all this guy has gotten away with. Any other president would have been impeached! What in God's name is wrong with our government that they allow this guy carte blanch. It absolutely boggles the mind! I feel much better now. I had been under the impression he hadn't been doing ANYTHING! But as you read these summary, indeed he has... FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGED THIS GREAT REPUBLIC, while those that have infinite knowledge of the above, lack the cojones, or whatever, to raise hell... Is it perhaps that these folks who know about so much wrong, fear the consequences of - "THE RACE CARD" or, political correctness at its worse?

Read more…

MY DADDY IS AN EXOTIC DANCER

MY DADDY IS AN EXOTIC DANCER

One day a fourth-grade teacher asked the children what their fathers

did for a living. All the typical answers came up -- fireman,
mechanic, businessman, salesman, doctor, lawyer, and so forth.

However, little Justin was being uncharacteristically quiet, so when

the teacher prodded him about his father, he finally replied,
'Okay... my father's an exotic dancer in a gay cabaret and takes off

all his clothes in front of other men and they put money in his

underwear. Sometimes, if the offer is really good, he will go home

with some guy and stay with him all night for money.'

The teacher, obviously shaken by this statement, hurriedly set the

other children to work on some exercises and then took little
Justin aside to ask him,

'Is that really true about your father?'

'No', the boy said, 'He actually works for the Democratic National

Committee and helped get Barack Obama elected President last
year, but I was too embarrassed to say that in front of the class.'

Read more…

WILL YOU VOTE?

What I see on a daily basis tends to upset me. I see a structure of what I always believed to be the greatest country in the world crumbling.

4063925977?profile=original

One must believe it started somewhere. I believe that education is a very big part of where we are today. Without educated young people, there will be no intelligent older people growing up.

4063997256?profile=original

Why must people today be vulgar and constantly put other people down? Why are the common people addressing an election with statements of wishing death upon those who they do not like? Lack of proper education comes to mind, once again.

The Liberals did have a plan when they wanted to take over this nation. It stems from beliefs like those of the late Saul Alinsky. He mentions that if you make the people happy by ridiculing others, you will have them doing it with no effort needed to have them keep it up. He had some brilliant concepts to take over a people and a nation. The key here is not to fall into the traps of what his concepts were.

4063997275?profile=originalHillary Clinton did her Thesis on Alinsky's fundamental beliefs. She added in a few more thoughts of her own. She will use the methods she believes in to make America a socialist/communist country if she runs and gets elected.

My worst nightmare is that she will win. The people voted blindly to get a 'black president'. What the people got was a Muslim sympathizer who deals with terrorists. He arms the enemy while 'we the people' clutch guns and yell that they will fight them if they come to America. 4063915276?profile=originalIt's far past the time to wake up. Folks, they are already here. It is a fair assumption that Hillary Clinton could be the next president of the United States. Then the people will have to hold their guns tighter because that4063997173?profile=original woman wants to disarm the citizens of this country.

The people will want to vote for the first woman president. Most voters are not very intelligent and vote for what they see rather than the issues at hand and the policies of the candidate. Benghazi seems to have been discarded because people get subpoenaed but just do not show up because they have resigned from the position they held when the embassy tragedy occurred.

People have been trying demonstrations. The 'Operation American Spring' brought a couple of people to Washington D.C.. They don't seem to even get media coverage. It also prompts O to leave the White House. Then there are those who stand behind threats of what they will do if confronted in this country. We must stop the insanity before we are all shooting Islamic terrorists in America.

We have a right to vote in this country. We must use that vote and not expect others to use it for us. One less vote for us is one more for the Democrats.

4063997293?profile=originalLet us win the majority for the Senate. We must start somewhere. Then, maybe, just maybe, we will be smart enough to have the right people running who can beat the Democrats. Hopefully all who are against what is happening to our country will vote for the same names and get a Republican who is Conservative into power. We must stick together or we are done; America we so love will be finished as the free country we knew Her to be.

If we are complacent now, I hate to see where we are going. It is time for action but this must be done the way it was intended to be done. We must vote. Voting is a privilege that our forefathers fought for. Use it and help save America.

Daveda Gruber

Read more…

HEAVEN AND HELL

HEAVEN AND HELL

While walking down the street one day a corrupt Senator was tragically hit by a car and died.
 
His soul arrives in heaven and is met by St. Peter at the entrance.
 
"Welcome to heaven," says St. Peter. "Before you settle in, it seems there is a problem. We seldom see a high official around these parts, you see, so we're not sure what to do with you."
 
"No problem, just let me in," says the Senator.
 
"Well, I'd like to, but I have orders from the higher ups. What we'll do is have you spend one day in hell and one in heaven. Then you can choose where to spend eternity."
 
"Really?, I've made up my mind. I want to be in heaven," says the Senator.
 
"I'm sorry, but we have our rules."
 
And with that, St. Peter escorts him to the elevator and he goes down, down, down to hell.
 
The doors open and he finds himself in the middle of a green golf course. In the distance is a clubhouse and standing in front of it are all his friends and other politicians who had worked with him.
 
Everyone is very happy and in evening dress. They run to greet him, shake his hand, and reminisce about the good times they had while getting rich at the expense of the people. 
They played a friendly game of golf and then dine on lobster, caviar and the finest champagne.
 
Also present is the devil, who really is a very friendly guy who is having a good time dancing and telling jokes.
 
They are all having such a good time that before the Senator realizes it, it is time to go.
 
Everyone gives him a hearty farewell and waves while the elevator rises.
 
The elevator goes up, up, up and the door reopens in heaven where St. Peter is waiting for him, "Now it's time to visit heaven...
 
So, 24 hours passed with the Senator joining a group of contented souls moving from cloud to cloud, playing the harp and singing. They have a good time and, before he realizes it, the 24 hours have gone by and St. Peter returns.
 
"Well, then, you've spent a day in hell and another in heaven. Now choose your eternity."
 
The Senator reflects for a minute, then he answers: "Well, I would never have said it before, I mean heaven has been delightful, but I think I would be better off in hell."
 
So St. Peter escorts him to the elevator and he goes down, down, down to hell...
 
Now the doors of the elevator open and he's in the middle of a barren land covered with waste and garbage. He sees all his friends, dressed in rags, picking up the trash and putting it in black bags as more trash falls from above
 
The devil comes over to him and puts his arm around his shoulders.
 
"I don't understand," stammers the Senator. "Yesterday I was here and there was a golf course and clubhouse, and we ate lobster and caviar, drank champagne, and danced and had a great time. Now there's just a wasteland full of garbage and my friends look miserable. What happened?" 
 
The devil smiles at him and says,
 
"Yesterday we were campaigning, Today, you voted.."  
  
Vote wisely in November 2014
Read more…