Glenn Neal > Ronald A. Nelson COL, USA, RetiredApril 12, 2021 at 11:53pm
Col. Nelson: I absolutly agree with your sentiment, but there is one small detail we need to take care of first: overturn New York Times v. Sullivan, a Supreme Court decision that [in effect] gave the MSM a license to lie. I will explain if you wish--I don't want to use up too much time on someone else's string. /s/ G. Neal, Attorney at law (Retired).
Neal, bringing a lawsuit for damages arising out of the willful lies, incitement to riot, and insurrection generated by the MSM's creative news (calculated to incite such riot and insurrection) should provide the CASE in law to do just that... reverse NYT vs. Sullivan. Am I correct?
Replies
Col. Nelson: I absolutly agree with your sentiment, but there is one small detail we need to take care of first: overturn New York Times v. Sullivan, a Supreme Court decision that [in effect] gave the MSM a license to lie. I will explain if you wish--I don't want to use up too much time on someone else's string. /s/ G. Neal, Attorney at law (Retired).
Neal, bringing a lawsuit for damages arising out of the willful lies, incitement to riot, and insurrection generated by the MSM's creative news (calculated to incite such riot and insurrection) should provide the CASE in law to do just that... reverse NYT vs. Sullivan. Am I correct?
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next