The Patriot Post ~ 7 Featuring "GARY BAUER"

CRT Propagandists Summon Their Cavalry: The NEA

safsVghjMKQ4QMJgFDQzKf1uwyV-ZbwmpnVZR2Zam5iih1EQH9wYPQiJkgo0zCcE2t8VH4BUm20Wl50X97zXsETlpU8g6Q04r3oee1IgHHV3ZwpzzK6a5iaP5PQzog=s0-d-e1-ft#?profile=RESIZE_400x

The nation’s largest teachers union, the National Education Association, ostensibly representing its 2.3 million members, has voted to make a high priority of ensuring that children are fully indoctrinated with racist anti-American Critical Race Theory curriculums — which are repackaged Marxism. A resolution to that end notes the NEA will “share and publicize … critical race theory (CRT) — what it is and what it is not [and] have a team of staffers for members who want to learn more and fight back against anti-CRT rhetoric.”

According to the NEA, all K-12 schools should teach children that “White supremacy, anti-Blackness, anti-indigeneity, racism, patriarchy, cis-hetero-patriarchy, capitalism, ableism, and anthropocentrism” form the oppressive foundation of our culture and society. This is the educational component of the “systemic racism” lie that the Democrat Party has embraced.

The NEA’s CRT resolution notes, “It is reasonable and appropriate for curriculum to be informed by academic frameworks for understanding and interpreting the impact of the past on current society, including critical race theory.”

The NEA brain trust concluded its statement by declaring: “To deny opportunities to teach the truth about Black, Brown, and other marginalized races minimizes [sic] the necessity for students to build efficacy. The ancient African proverb says, ‘Know Thyself.’” Actually, “Know Thyself” is a well-documented ancient Greek aphorism noted by the writer Pausanias. We’re calling cultural appropriation on this one.

As for opposition to the CRT curriculums, despite the lack of attention from the mainstream media, that opposition is coming from grassroots and parent groups, which are upending plans to instill CRT in a growing number of our nation’s public schools. Even in the liberal bastion of northern Virginia, opposition to CRT and other race-based programs has stymied those who wished to indoctrinate our children with the 1619 Project notion that our republic was founded on the basis of racism solely to promote slavery.

One black parent of two kids in Illinois, Ty Smith, whose recent CRT objections at a school board meeting were posted by Newsweek, protested: “You’re going to deliberately teach kids that he’s got it better than you because he’s white? You’re gonna tell a white kid, ‘Oh, black people are all down and suppressed.’ How do I have two medical degrees if I’m sitting here oppressed? Two medical degrees. No mom or dad in the house. Worked my way through college. Hustled my butt off and got two degrees. You’re gonna tell me white folks are gonna keep me from doing that? Are you serious?! … I’ve been talking to black folks. You know what? None of them are buying this nonsense.”

To their great credit, several states have already banned CRT curriculums in public schools, and more have plans in the works to excise as much race-based and biased education from the school day as possible.

Leftists aren’t used to facing such opposition to their educational agenda, so they have been caught a bit flat-footed by the recent upsurge in counter-protest activity. The NEA is coming to the rescue on those fronts.

The NEA has delegated $56,500 to conduct opposition research on groups objecting to CRT indoctrination and other false racial narratives. The union adopted a motion stating, “NEA will research the organizations attacking educators doing anti-racist work and/or use the research already done and put together a list of resources and recommendations for state affiliates, locals, and individual educators to utilize when they are attacked.”

The NEA also allocated $70,000 to a program to regain the initiative on CRT. According to The Daily Wire, the union “also vowed to team up with organizations such as Black Lives Matter at School and the Zinn Education Project — named after the anti-American and factually challenged historian Howard Zinn — to call for an October 14 rally in honor of George Floyd’s birthday ‘as a national day of action to teach lessons about structural racism and oppression.’”

Granted, the funding for these initiatives is small compared to the $23 million the union spent on political initiatives in the 2020 election cycle. But compared to the limited resources of grassroots parent groups standing in the gauntlet between CRT and their children, the NEA is a Goliath-sized adversary.

Let’s ask a simple question: Who are the aggressors in the culture war? Is it parents who want their children to learn basic American history and civics? Or is it the Marxist indoctrination who wish to train a new generation of anti-American zealots to upend everything most Americans hold dear?

While the NEA would rightly consider our humble shop among its most vociferous foes, we, and those who believe as we do in American exceptionalism, are the defenders of American history in its proper context. It’s time for the NEA to face that fact, and we’ll tell it that for free.

(Note: The NEA has removed pages on its CRT resolutions and actions from its website.) ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/81124?mailing_id=5974&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.5974&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body

 

Who’s Running the Show at 1600?
F6SE1iGq1382X5kKX6rpp7kFtXkL9BQAKcV4T3FHu7cCBqdaFXPniIvuqmPwzU2Ytkv6u8cpjWVUE266Lz2jn5fyMeQMNeDQKyvfEc9CVM_PBDeCb321Ll77WNmFDQ=s0-d-e1-ft#?profile=RESIZE_400x

Last month, we wondered — not for the first time — about President bumble/socialist/scumbag/liar-Joe Biden’s mental state. We wondered whether he was really up to the job he’d been pushed into by a Democrat Party desperate to get rid of Donald Trump.

We’re still wondering. And so, clearly, are a lot of other Americans, if a new poll by the Trafalgar Group is any indication. The poll asked one simple question of 1,086 likely voters: Do you believe President bumble/socialist/ scumbag/liar-Biden is fully executing the duties of his office? The results make clear that certain things can’t be hidden forever by a complicit mainstream media, as 56.5% of likely voters don’t believe bumble/socialist/ scumbag/liar-Biden is fully in charge, 36.4% believe he is, and 7.1% aren’t sure.

Think about that: Just over a third of us think Joe Biden is fully carrying out the duties of the presidency. The rest of us, to varying degrees, are pretty sure that he isn’t.

Perhaps even more remarkable is that 31.7% of Democrats don’t think bumble/socialist/scumbag/liar-Biden is fully in charge. Here, it would’ve been fascinating to know what percentage of that percentage is actually relieved that other hard-left elements within the bumble/ socialist/scumbag/liar-Biden White House are actually directing policy.

The latest painful example of bumble/socialist/ scumbag/liar-Biden’s cognitive struggles played out during his visit to a northern Michigan ice cream shop over the July 4th weekend. When he was asked about the latest Russian cyberattack, he appeared completely at a loss while he fumbled around in his coat pocket for some talking points:

This is just one of many episodes in which bumble/ socialist/scumbag/liar-Biden, unscripted and forced to think on his feet, fails to do so. And we mentioned the media’s complicity, because it’s worth recalling how differently they treated Trump when he was in office. Recall the regular discussions about the 25th Amendment against Trump — the amendment that outlines the pattern of succession should a president become incapacitated. Further, recall the media’s repeated demands that President Trump take a cognitive test — demands that have fallen utterly silent during the bumble/socialist/scumbag/liar-Biden presidency.

Perhaps more than any other American citizen, first-term Texas Republican Congressman Ronny Jackson is qualified to weigh in on this issue. After all, he understands the great strain and the awesome cognitive demands of the American presidency, because he served as White House physician to both Barack scumbag/liar-nObama and Donald Trump.

Last month, Jackson penned a letter to Biden, cosigned by 13 fellow House Republicans, which urged the president to submit to a cognitive test and share the results with the American people. He also issued a written statement, which read in part:

VIDEO:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DcQPqMANBfY

The American people deserve to have absolute confidence in their President. They deserve to know that he or she can perform the duties demanded of the office, and they deserve to have full transparency on the mental state of their highest elected leader. I would argue that the American people don’t have that confidence in President Biden. When I was Physician to President Donald J. Trump, the liberal media relentlessly pushed a narrative that he needed a cognitive test and that it should be the standard for anyone serving as Commander-in-Chief and Head of State. I administered the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) test and President Trump excelled. Given the precedent set and Biden’s clear mental impairment, I believe it is past time he undergoes a cognitive test.

“You don’t need to be a physician to look at this behavior and see there’s something concerning happening,” Jackson said of bumble/socialist/scumbag/liar-Biden over the weekend. “You can go back — there’s 40 years of tape of this man. He’s always made gaffes and stuff, but these are different. He’s confused, he’s disoriented. … He’s just not aging gracefully at this point.”

Indeed, he’s not. Nor is the mainstream media carrying out its duties to ask the essential question about this most vital matter of national security: Is the American president of sound mind? ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/81151?mailing_id=5974&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.5974&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body

 

The Door-to-Door Vaccination Salesman
Y0nYlgHt5_noXDs6gYCAaOqvHzix5OK7mzTmTp-9Q5HPyL2eLCQoYU0xUvMzMvn-kx7nnwVfzOj8rSieQvMUF-E6E8ZiKpDwQChhXj-8AHzobLS7C0VV4NpAn_6Ucw=s0-d-e1-ft#?profile=RESIZE_400x

An odd but somehow predictable thing has happened with the COVID vaccines — they’ve become political. And they might be coming to your front door.

Let’s review. President Donald Trump initiated Operation Warp Speed, a partnership between the federal government and several pharmaceutical companies, to produce multiple vaccines to a novel virus in record time. He set in motion a distribution plan that had nearly a million Americans receiving shots in the arm every day.

President bumble/socialist/scumbag/liar-Joe Biden liked to take credit for this early in his administration, but then he failed to reach his own goal of 70% of Americans fully vaccinated by July 4.

Why? As we noted yesterday, he blames racism and hesitancy among young people.

The real reason might be that his administration has so politicized the vaccines that Republicans are receiving the shot at a far lower rate than Democrats. CBS put the numbers at 45% and 86%, respectively.

How bizarre is that? The people that suffer Trump Derangement Syndrome, the people to whom you must not even whisper the word “hydroxychloroquine” because Trump once talked about it, are the ones lining up to get Trump’s vaccine. Meanwhile, Trump’s voters are rejecting it en masse.

Is this a great country or what?

Now, that brings us to yesterday’s news, which included both bumble/socialist/scumbag/liar-Biden and his spokesperson, liar-Jen Psaki, talking about a door-to-door vaccination effort.

To be clear, neither one directly said they’d be giving shots to people at their doors. That would be a whole other level of authoritarian creepiness — and perhaps not beyond Team bumble/socialist/scumbag/liar-Biden. But even the notion of sending either bureaucrats or volunteers to knock on your door merely to evangelize you about the vaccines has, at best, a cultish feel to it, and the only effect it will have for the unvaccinated is to confirm their determination not to receive the shot(s).

“Our administration is going to devote the remainder of the summer to a special focus on five ways to make gains and getting those of you who are unvaccinated vaccinated,” said bumble/socialist/scumbag/liar-Biden. “We need to go community by community, neighborhood by neighborhood, and oftentimes door to door, literally knocking on doors to get help to the remaining people, protected from the virus.”

liar-Psaki likewise talked about “a targeted community-by-community, door-to-door outreach to get remaining Americans vaccinated, by ensuring they have the information they need on how both safe and accessible the vaccine is.”

Some of the alarm no doubt comes from the fact that liar-Psaki went on to use the term “strike forces” to describe the effort. Nothing says “I’m from the government and I’m here to help” like a vaccination “strike force.”

Even if the effort is far more benign than “strike force” implies, how will the government know which doors to knock on? Vaccine passports?

Either way, there was a certain mob threat implicit from liar-Psaki. “There are much higher rates of vaccinations in some parts of the country over others,” she said, “and we certainly support their decisions to implement any measures that they think will help [keep] their community safe.” In other words, reimpose restrictions.

Nice community you’ve got there. Shame if anything happened to it.

Unsurprisingly, the reaction from Republicans was swift and defiant. “How about don’t knock on my door,” said Texas Congressman Dan Crenshaw. “You’re not my parents. You’re the government. Make the vaccine available, and let people be free to choose. Why is that concept so hard for the left?”

Why indeed. Because “progressives” think they know everything and therefore make better decisions than you do. They can make you buy health insurance, make you celebrate someone else’s gender dysphoria, teach you what history to appreciate and which historical figures to hate, decide what generates your electricity, and spend your money more charitably.

Why can’t they knock on your door and kindly ask if you have a personal relationship with the COVID vaccine?  ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/81148?mailing_id=5974&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.5974&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body

 

scumbag/liar-Cuomo Declares ‘Gun Violence’ a Public Health Crisis
IF2ydGeBavJjMbh1FBDCQYWeuMb63-oMrMYHr7djt3yw6F_uk3wp0g42HuI5Gth71ynZaOTIKWc7J1VQ5XFpO7EkYdsUZfj3sV1Uw46tGp2YDZXhtQRb9LcBkMXNzQ=s0-d-e1-ft#?profile=RESIZE_400x

Cutting law enforcement funding to appease the “defund the police” Left and Black Lives Matter yielded the all-too-predictable result — spiking crime, especially in The Big Apple. That has New York Governor scumbag/liar-Andrew Cuomo declaring a disaster emergency … against “gun violence.” That’s right — according to scumbag/liar-Cuomo, blame for this growing crime wave is all the fault of guns.

“If you can beat COVID, you can beat gun violence,”  scumbag/liar-Cuomo declared on Tuesday. “We’re in a new epidemic, and it’s gun violence, and it’s a matter of life and death also.” scumbag/liar-Cuomo further asserted that “gun violence” is a “public health crisis” that he plans to aggressively tackle with the same resolve he applied to COVID. Given his deadly nursing home debacle, touting his COVID record seems like the wrong direction to go for building public confidence in his plan, but we digress.

scumbag/liar-Cuomo elaborated on his new “gun violence” initiative by stating: “This new strategy treats gun violence as a public health crisis, using short-term solutions to manage the immediate gun violence crisis and reduce the shooting rate, as well as long-term solutions that focus on community-based intervention and prevention strategies to break the cycle of violence. The disaster emergency allows the State to expedite money and resources to communities so they can begin targeting gun violence immediately.”

The trouble is the leftist fallacy of “gun violence,” which ignores the reality that guns are merely a tool wielded by individuals for either good or evil. Suggesting that guns and not criminals are the problem will do nothing to address the actual problem.

At least scumbag/liar-Cuomo recognizes that the spiking crime rate is a problem. Yet, like the Left’s attack on police over false claims of “systemic racism,”  scumbag/liar-Cuomo’s “solution” is a problem and a threat to New Yorkers’ Second Amendment rights.

Meanwhile, there’s the Democrats’ soft approach to crime. Alvin Bragg, the winner of the Democrat primary and therefore likely soon to be district attorney for Manhattan, has made it clear he won’t prosecute “minor” crimes because to do so would go against his woke views on justice.

As National Review’s Kyle Smith writes: “Bragg holds that locking up criminals does not make a city safer: ‘In the 80s when I was growing up, when we were incarcerating more, I was not safer.’ He suggests ‘diversion’ into therapeutic programs for those charged with drug offenses, but when asked whether the criminals in question should at least be forced to complete drug-treatment programs before their charges are dropped, he said merely that a ‘good-faith’ effort is all he expects. He has also said that police should not be responding to ‘mental-health crisis calls,’ so don’t expect the police to come by to deal with anyone who might be merely a ranting lunatic, until it’s too late.”

Democrats like scumbag/liar-Cuomo and Bragg epitomize the long-running problem with the party of the donkey. Democrats repeatedly create bad public policy that predictably results in greater societal destruction and decay, and then they turn and blame the fallout on America’s commitment to individual liberty and freedom. In truth, New York’s public crisis is one of leftist politicians seeking to amass ever more control over the lives of those they were ostensibly elected to serve.

Try solving problems such as the spiking violent crime rate by supporting law enforcement, helping cops to better do their jobs, while at the same time refraining from burdening citizens with ideologically based virtue signals that only serve to further divide people rather than bring about greater unity. ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/81149?mailing_id=5974&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.5974&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body

 

Facebook’s Obsession With ‘Extremists’
cFtVXEvjkDVBQL5pxl5xo25BtTPkpzvmC2b3q6kWdWf3Zvf4y9gDU2yFrqr1ZfyYUd-Gb_HwHkvcaY9_zjkOGKYubjWoJ8g2G9qW7yoUo_r9f9t2zzvxZqfWjKOjAA=s0-d-e1-ft#?profile=RESIZE_400x

RedState editor Kira Davis got the message. So did Newsmax’s John Cardillo. And Virginia State House delegate Nick Freitas. And writer and commentator Alex Berenson. But, strangely, no one on the Left appears to have gotten it. Nope, none of those folks from the anti-America party — the party of kneelers, rioters, statue-topplers, and assorted race-baiters and haters of the “wealthy white men” who founded this great nation.

The “it,” in this case, is an Orwellian notification from Facebook that seems to have been directed at conservatives but not progressives. The message reads: “Are you concerned that someone you know is becoming an extremist? We care about preventing extremism on Facebook. Others in your situation have received confidential support.”

Below that is a call to action: “How you can help: Hear stories and get advice from people who escaped violent extremist groups,” followed by a clickable “Get Support” button.

Not the Bee has catalogued the various if-then scenarios being deployed by Facebook to keep you safe from the extremists in your life.

It seems like overkill, though — if you’ll pardon the violent extremism — if the goal is to root out those 22 violent extremists that bumble/socialist/scumbag/liar-Joe Biden keeps talking about when he says, “Terrorism from white supremacy is the most lethal threat to the homeland today.” But then again, we thought it was overkill when Facebook exorcised its Donald Trump demons by banning him from its platform for at least two years. Same with its deployment of circular “fact-checks” for every bit of COVID-19 news its leftist censors didn’t agree with.

In any case, Facebook, in addition to allowing you to lord it over your “friends” about just how smart your kids are, or how clever your cat is, or how great that trip to the lake was, is now encouraging folks to rat out their friends for wrongthink and other potential thought crimes. Nice.

As Cardillo quipped: “This just popped up when I checked my Facebook app. And you doubt the NSA is illegally spying on Tucker Carlson and every other conservative?”

And if it’s really extremists they’re looking for, former lefty Dave Rubin announced that he’s on the case: “I just reported AOC, Omar and Tlaib,” he tweeted.

Or, as Berenson put it: “Yeah, I’m becoming an extremist. An anti-Facebook extremist. ‘Confidential help is available?’ Who do they think they are? Either they’re a publisher and a political platform legally liable for every bit of content they host, or they need to STAY OUT OF THE WAY. Zuck’s choice.”

This, in a nutshell, is the conservative argument against Facebook’s constant suppression of speech that its thought police find fearful. It’s either a publisher or a platform, but it shouldn’t be allowed the privileges of both.

Relaaax, say the good folks at Facebook. All this is only a test.

“This test,” they say, “is part of our larger work to assess ways to provide resources and support to people on Facebook who may have engaged with or were exposed to extremist content, or may know someone who is at risk. We are partnering with NGO’s and academic experts in this space and hope to have more to share in the future.”

More to share in the future, eh? We can’t wait. ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/81127?mailing_id=5974&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.5974&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body

 

Christianity Today Promotes ‘Gun Violence’ Fallacy
uFEDn4Dc0TCBR2JXnw01L_Q_z0mi0ikKYK928tcUgRNdU9Pe73LfJ7tPUh_RS3eneb6DtTg4JuyorXLdOmZSIC2JWmQZAjnun3pWlL68ZQA7FvI5wnHLGCZcSqFwwQ=s0-d-e1-ft#?profile=RESIZE_400x

Everyone’s heard it, yet there are those who simply continue to reject the basic truth of it: “Guns don’t kill people; people do.” Defenders of the Second Amendment have long understood that it codifies the right of individuals to protect themselves against those who would seek to do them harm. And the firearm is one of the best tools ever invented for the purpose of self-defense, as it serves to level the playing field, no matter the size or strength of the individual wielding a weapon. Yet this truth doesn’t overcome the objection of the anti-gun activist.

“Imagine a world with no gun violence,” the anti-gun activist suggests, presuming that this would be a safer, less violent world. But the truth is we don’t have to imagine such a world, as we have a long historical record of a world before the invention of firearms — a dangerous world from which most gun control advocates today would quickly recoil.

People were killing, maiming, threatening, abusing, enslaving, stealing, etc. long before the firearm was invented because the source of violence lies in the hearts and minds of people.

And yet the anti-gun lobby denies reality with the disingenuous term “gun violence.” As if firearms were self-willed entities roaming the streets shooting people at random for spite or sport. “If we could just get guns off the street,” the political talking point goes, with the assumed outcome being some utopian dream world free of violence.

It’s one thing when secularists, whose concept of evil is limited to forces within society, espouse such pie-in-the-sky imaginings, but for a Christian to espouse such views is a sure demonstration that they are not thinking biblically.

Recently, Christianity Today ran an op-ed entitled, “Are We Attempting to Serve Two Masters, Jesus and Gun Rights?” It’s an excerpt from a forthcoming book from anti-gun activist and Christiansburg attack survivor Taylor Schumann titled, Beyond Thoughts and Prayers. It’s clear from the title that Schumann believes the right to bear arms runs counter to Christianity.

“When I log into my online survivors support group I see posts of despair by people who miss their children, their parents, and their friends who were stolen by guns,” Schumann writes. “While some people sit in homes admiring the guns on their nightstand or in their display cases, there’s another group of people who are trying their best to figure out how to live in a world where those guns are more important than their lives and the lives of people they love.”

This is a classic display of blaming the tool rather than the perpetrator, as well as assigning guilt by association. As a Christian, Schumann should know that the source of evil is sin in the hearts of people.

Before the gun, people used swords, knives, clubs, rocks, or any of a plethora of tools to commit acts of violence and evil. But it is also true that before guns, people used swords, knives, etc. to defend themselves against evil, prevent crimes, and protect the innocent. It’s the intent behind the use of these tools that matters, not the mere existence of these tools.

By failing to make this obvious yet profound distinction, Schumann’s desire to “end gun violence” ironically works against the very concern she later espouses, which is to “bring the Kingdom of God to this earth with our hands and our feet.” By avoiding humanity’s fundamental problem, sin, which is the reason Jesus came to the earth in the first place, Schumann is actually doing the opposite of “being a follower of Jesus” and inviting “other people into His kingdom.”

Schumann creates a false and non-biblical dichotomy between following Jesus and the right to bear arms, as if the two were mutually exclusive. She attempts to make this argument stick by insinuating that those concerned about defending the Second Amendment are essentially engaged in the sin of idolatry — worshiping their firearms (“admiring the guns in their nightstand or in their display cases”). She apparently cannot conceive of the possibility that the vast majority of gun owners, Christian or otherwise, own guns out of a desire to protect life rather than take it.

In the end of the excerpt, Schumann presses hard on her false dichotomy by referencing Jesus’s parable of the good Samaritan. “We can’t keep passing the dying man on the side of the road,” she writes. “We’ve desperately tried for decades to hold a Bible in one hand and a gun in the other and we have no hands left to serve each other, or Jesus. We have to choose. We have to lay one down. So I ask, ``Who will you serve this day?”

To take some liberty with Schumann’s rather ill-conceived illustration, suppose the good Samaritan were to have come upon the scene of the victim actively being attacked by bandits. Should that Samaritan have stood by and waited until they were done beating the man near to death before helping? According to Schumann, he wouldn’t have a hand free to serve if he was carrying a weapon.

Offering straw man arguments that don’t actually engage the fundamental issues at play doesn’t serve people, nor does it honor Jesus. Smearing Christians who defend the Second Amendment as tacitly promoting “gun violence” is deceitful and demeaning. One could just as easily ask Schumann whether her apparent obsession over ending “gun violence” is becoming a two-masters issue — serving her own vision of the kingdom of God versus that of the Bible. ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/articles/81126?mailing_id=5974&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.5974&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body

 

GARY BAUER
NAGMxqNp3hZY_A1vfVtUys6bEZLd7sURua1myIWG3CZjpHy5a5Uas3PpokJaPxQc5SQDskv9GYypwh5G7xCu3vKJkNh9trvUmKnpbrnQOIxqXA=s0-d-e1-ft#<a href=
Drunk on Wokeism

Almost everybody has an embarrassing story of a drunk relative who ruined a family gathering or holiday get-together. That’s what the American left did this weekend during America’s 245th birthday party. It showed up drunk on wokeism.

Nothing was spared. No sacred icon or historical figure from our noble past was off limits. No table was left unturned by not one but a whole drunk family of leftist malcontents. Here are some of the worst incidents.

  • College students in our nation’s capital said they were “embarrassed” to be American. Those who said America isn’t the greatest nation in the world struggled to name a better country.

  • The Nation, a far-left media outfit, attacked our Founding Fathers as “colonizers,” and declared that “American exceptionalism is grounded in racism and militarism.”

  • The New York Times attacked the Stars and Stripes, suggesting it was no longer a unifying symbol because conservatives love the flag.

  • A Washington Post columnist declared the Statue of Liberty “a symbol of hypocrisy or unfulfilled promises.”

  • An opinion piece also in the Post declared that celebrating our 250th birthday will be difficult because “it may be less clear than ever what it is we are celebrating.”

  • “Defund NPR” was trending Monday after the taxpayer-funded media outlet critiqued the Declaration of Independence as “a document with flaws and deeply ingrained hypocrisies.”

  • Rep. scumbag/worthless-Cori Bush (D-MO) tweeted this: “When they say that the 4th of July is about American freedom, remember this: the freedom they’re referring to is for white people. This land is stolen land and Black people still aren’t free.”

If a wrecking crew arrived at a party intent on destroying it, we’d call the police. But that would only outrage this gang even more because they hate the police too! If the Chinese communists wanted to disrespect us on our birthday, they couldn’t have done a better job than our so-called “fellow Americans” did.

Speaking of communist China, it did have something to say about July 4th. Beijing’s official propaganda outlet published an editorial that could have been written by Rep. scumbag/worthless-Cori Bush, socialist/commie-Bernie Sanders or socialist/commie/liar-AOC. It slammed America as “selfish,” stated that racial strife is “almost unbridgeable” and declared that America is now “in its least confident stage.”

Make Hating America Shameful Again

In recent years, it’s been shocking to hear scumbag/ worthless-Ilhan Omar, scumbag/worthless-Rashida Talib, socialist/commie/liar-AOC, socialist/commie-Bernie Sanders and other radicals regularly slander the nation of Israel. They just can’t keep their anti-Semitism under control.

Democrat leaders know it’s so over-the-top that they have to at least slap them on the wrist. What’s striking now is how vicious attacks against our own country by the same crowd are just shrugged off.

Where’s the press conference by the Democrat leadership denouncing scumbag/worthless-Cori Bush and the members of their party who routinely slander our nation, even on the Fourth of July?

More often than not, we get lectures that we should take pride in their exercise of “free speech.” We live in a time when anyone who appears to express hatred for a particular race is beyond the pale, as it should be. But why is one of our two leading political parties so glib about people in its own ranks who seemingly hate America?

One of the reasons we have so much illegal immigration is that many Democrat cities have declared themselves to be sanctuary cities. They are telling illegal aliens, “Come to America and hide here in San Francisco, Seattle or New York.”

The left is doing the same thing for anti-Americanism. It’s providing a sanctuary for it. There’s no shame among leftists in interrupting the national anthem, burning the flag or saying, “America is so evil that it needs to be fundamentally transformed.” That’s what critical race theory is all about — tearing down the country so it can be “fundamentally transformed.”

And there’s no shortage of Democrats who provide sanctuary for this hatred by applauding it as “freedom of speech,” while they applaud Big Tech for censoring expressions of conservative speech and conservative ideas.

Gov. scumbag/liar-Andrew Cuomo infamously said that pro-life Americans have no place in New York state. Has he or any Democrat governor or senator ever said, “If you hate this good and decent land, don’t come here”?

Remove scumbag/worthless-Omar Now

Rep. scumbag/worthless-Ilhan Omar recently compared the United States and Israel to Hamas and the Taliban. (How’s that for hating America?) After initially denying the comparison, she later doubled down, telling CNN’s Jake Tapper that she did not regret the comparison she claimed she didn’t make. scumbag/worthless-Omar then proceeded to attack Jewish Democrats for being “Islamophobic” and not real “partners in justice.”

Pastor John Hagee and Christians United for Israel (CUFI), a tremendous organization I have worked with for many years, issued a statement blasting Omar as unfit to serve on the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

They are demanding that Speaker scumbag/liar-Nancy Pelosi no longer tolerate Omar’s anti-Semitism by removing her from the House Foreign Affairs Committee. Click here to sign CUFI’s petition.

Bipartisanship Gone Bad

As you know, a gang of Republican senators — Cassidy (LA), Collins (ME), Murkowski (AK), Portman (OH) and Romney (UT) — made themselves feel really good by negotiating with the bumble/socialist/scumbag/liar-Biden White House for weeks on an infrastructure deal. They thought they were showing America that bipartisanship can work again.

They were blindsided when bumble/socialist/ scumbag/liar-Joe Biden threatened to veto the bipartisan bill of “only” $1 trillion unless he also got a second bill worth $4 to $6 trillion. After significant blowback, the White House was forced to issue a statement clarifying what Biden meant.

Even the Washington Post had trouble keeping up with Biden’s ever-changing position, evidenced by this headline: “bumble/socialist/scumbag/liar-Biden Reverses Himself On Infrastructure, Says He Would Sign Bipartisan Deal.”

But Speaker scumbag/liar-Nancy Pelosi upped the ante, saying it was “all or nothing.” Either Democrats get everything they want, meaning both bills at a $5 to $7 trillion price tag, or nothing passes, even if Republican and Democrat senators agree on it.

And what was the reaction of the Republican senators who negotiated the bipartisan deal? They said they trusted bumble/socialist/scumbag/liar-Joe Biden. They trust that the White House’s written statement is what Biden really believes, not what he said 48 hours before.

Why am I bringing this up again?

A bunch of Republican consultants and officeholders still can’t figure out how Donald Trump won the GOP nomination and why he remains the leader of the Republican Party today. It’s partly because of what is happening on these infrastructure bills.

The Democrats are committed to “fundamentally transforming America.” Some Republicans are committed to bipartisanship, which in this current environment means helping to advance the left’s transformation process.

Throughout the 2016 primaries, polling found that conservative voters felt “betrayed” by the Republican Party. Why would they feel betrayed? Because of things like this — a handful of Republican senators are willing to deliver a “bipartisan win” to bumble/socialist/scumbag/liar-Joe Biden, proving once again that there is an “Evil Party” and a “Stupid Party.”  ~The Patriot Post

https://patriotpost.us/opinion/81129?mailing_id=5974&utm_medium=email&utm_source=pp.email.5974&utm_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body

 

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center

Email me when people reply –