“Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections.”
The U.S. Supreme Court has issued a ruling in Texas’ lawsuit challenging election procedures in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin. The lawsuit divided the nation, with roughly half the states supporting and opposing the lawsuit, respectively.
The Court just denied Texas’ request to file a Bill of Complaint. Justices Alito and Thomas would have granted it, but denied any additional relief.
Here’s the Order:
155, ORIG. TEXAS V. PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot.
Statement of Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins: In my view, we do not have discretion to deny the filing of a bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction. See Arizona v. California, 589 U. S. ___ (Feb. 24, 2020) (Thomas, J., dissenting). I would therefore grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not grant other relief, and I express no view on any other issue.
read more: https://legalinsurrection.com/2020/12/u-s-supreme-court-denies-texas-lawsuit-for-lack-of-standing/
Replies
Colonel: On the spell checker: I have often heard the quote: "auto-correct is my enema."
That's what one receives when one takes the freeware ... you get what you pay for... Nothing ventured, nothing gained...
Seems accurate here though.
Martial Law may be the only option to ensure Constitutional succession to the office of President occurs... the stolen election is not just about election fraud. The Election Fraud was merely the vehicle for a much deeper and covert COUP de Eta plot. The Election Fraud could not work without the support of corrupt state and federal officials.
This fraudulent election was a well planned and coordinated conspiracy to deny Pres. Trump a second term in office... The Election Fraud was the primary tool of the COUP, it was the vehicle by which a Marxist dupe would be installed as President, and a socialist Cabinet as our government. The goal was much larger than replacing Trump it was about installing a socialist government... with hard-line Marxist leanings.
The Coup... involved both foreign and domestic powers, those in government and the private sector (MSM/social networks). It required careful planning and the coordinated efforts of the private and government sectors to cover up and secure the stolen election results. The MSM, Law Enforcement, and the Courts have all contributed to the fraud and are part of the coup. Treason is afoot.
SCOTUS rejected the initial wording, but said if they changed the wording from "a motion for leave to file a bill of complaint" to "a motion to file a bill of complaint" they would hear the complaint...
This is typical bureaucratic carp... all of the courts have been using administrative motions and procedural objections to deny any of the current lawsuits a hearing on the evidence... this is what attorneys do when stalling. The Courts are totally corrupt ... either for ideological reasons or fear from personal retribution for their actions... both of which primarily come from the LEFTIST and Marxist in our society. IT is time to review and rewrite the Federal Judiciary act with an eye on restricting the court's rulings to the case before them and no others.... time to deny them to rewrite the law thru Judicial Fiat.
We must clearly rebut Maybury v. Madison and the courts usurped powers of judicial review... the power to rewrite or void laws. Their verdicts must be limited to the case in law before them and no further. Let Congress take up any verdict that rules a law unconstitutional and if they agree they can amend or repeal the law... if they don't agree the law remains as written...if they take no action ... the law remains as written. Individual relief for a law deemed unconstitutional must be CASE BY CASE, not precedent. There can be only one body of law... the Constitutional and statutory law. The law of the Courts by precedent is unconstitutional... the rule of law by judicial fiat.
Perhaps he meant "carping"?
Any other intent is crappy.
(as in stinks like 3 day old fish,
and thats' no red herring)
It is carping... I have an auto spell checker that has been changing words it has a deficient vocabulary... wants me to buy the new and improved version... instead I will just remove it and find another with a better dictionary...
My hassle is that I try to type out my ideas in a stream of consciousness. Then I try to review for grammer and diction. I cannot seem to hit the 100 percent correction mark, and have to repeat to correct errors. You have noticed no doubt?
The message does work out eventually. "Reed" the page post and not the email for final result.
Everything is fishy with the government.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
of 14 Next