Replies

    • The Presidency and the Senate, not both houses. That is what I meant. Both are R at this time, is what I meant to say.

    • you're an IDIOT....

      TAKE YOUR 'BLEEDING HEART ELSEWHERE........

      PRESIDENT TRUMP has his job to do....THAT'S WHY HE WAS ELECTED..........

    • Under the present strain of an insurrection and internal insurgency... we need all of our Justices standing ready in the Court to facilitate the rapid adudication of challenges that may result from electcion and voter fraud in the coming election...  There is no Constitutional or Statutory provision that requires the US Senate to hold off on any SCOTUS appointment.

    • EXACTLY TRUE.........

    • After Justice Scalia was murdered you mean.  There is no justification for allowing the court to go without a new Conservative justice just as good as he was.  There's 4 months to get this done no matter who wins the election and for the sake of the Republic it needs to be done.

       

    • If the demo-socialist's bring up Merrick Garland's name as an excuse for Trump not to act; I would remind them that the great obama also made the statement, "I won, you lost, deal with it".

       

    • No one here respects Saul Alinsky, much less will fall like a dupe for his self serving hypocrisy. Good luck with that. The American people did have a say when they elected a populist president and a GOP Senate majority.  So lets just accept actions on that premise, shall we?

      My civil rights, freedoms, and liberties are placing great store in that, particularly my Second Amendment affirmed unabridgable right to self defense, especially to keep and bear arms. That one recieved scant support from the late Justice.

    • I'm wondering out loud.. but in response to your post.. when Justice Scalia died in February of 2016, I think Obama was confident enough in his thinking that Hillary was going to win; and even though he put Merrick Garland's name forward, I don't really recall him putting up a stink when they decided not to go forward with the proceedings. I think - and mind you- as I said, I'm not sure; but I think he was leaving Garland to have Hillary put him on the bench. When President Trump won, it caught everyone off guard and they knew Garland wasn't going to make it. It's just a suppostion. I have no facts to back this up. I work in the court system here in Massachusetts and we just lost our Supreme Court Justice this past Monday. I met him once. I don't know if Charlie Baker is going to put a name forward or not. He may let it slide until after the election as we're going to be electing a new governor in November. He may not. So we're in the same boat.

       

  • Maybe we can now get some order on the supreme court when President Trump can get another justice approved.

    • I doubt there will be any order connected to a nominee to replace Ginsburg. If Biden gets elected he will follow the lead of his VP, Harris, in his appointment of what will be seen as a radical left wing nominee. If Trump remains president he will be thwarted in choosing a nominee not only by the democrats but but a number of his own party, Collins and Romney to name two, who will oppose his choice. 

This reply was deleted.