ADMIN

10140511082?profile=RESIZE_710x

The immigration policy that is known as the Remain in Mexico program is now on a fast track to having oral arguments heard by the U.S. Supreme Court. The Supreme Court agreed on Friday to expedite a review of the Biden administration’s plan to do away with the program.

 

The Remain in Mexico program formally titled the Migrant Protection Protocols (MMP) is a Trump-era policy that allows illegal migrants to be sent back across the southern border to wait on the Mexico side for their asylum cases to be heard. Joe Biden put a stop to the program when he took office, as he did with most of the previous administration’s immigration policies. Biden essentially promised open borders when he campaigned and he has shown no interest in securing the southern border against the flood of illegal migrants crossing over from the Mexican border into the United States. In earlier judgments, lower courts have sided against the Biden administration and ruled that it has not provided adequate reasons for ending the policy. The courts have ruled that the Biden administration’s procedures for asylum seekers are unlawful.

More than a year into his term as president, the DOJ is still arguing that the Trump administration’s immigration policies were inhumane. Biden’s wrong-headed approach to illegal immigration includes burying his head in the sand and pretending the Biden border crisis does not exist. The State of Texas, for example, has filed numerous lawsuits against the Biden administration, as it is the epicenter of illegal migration. The Supreme Court refused to stop a ruling by a Texas federal judge and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit last summer that compelled the Biden administration to put the program back in place. Since then, the administration has slow-walked re-instating the program while professing compliance with the court order. The administration claims the Supreme Court must review the case, arguing that lower courts usurped the powers of the president.

read more here: https://hotair.com/karen-townsend/2022/02/19/supreme-court-fast-tracks-arguments-in-remain-in-mexico-border-policy-n449734

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • It comes down to the simple fact that neither the courts nor this administration nor the earlier usurper's administration knows the difference between these two words. 

    Immigration.  Vs.  Migration.

    There is NO constitutional or statutory right to "migrate" into this country. 

    There IS constitutional AND statutory authority over Immigration. Nothing and no ignoramus court can change either one of these definitions. The procedures required for immigration are straightforward. 

    "Immigrants" apply and go through the legal process after waiting in line. They go through the immigration process. Duh.

    Migrants are ILLEGAL ALIENS by definition in the 1952 McCarren Walter Act passed by Congress, which also abdicated some of Congress' authority to the POTUS, which allows POTUS to keep out any group of people from any country in the world for any reason and for any length of time. Trump's 1st EO was perfectly lawful but the 9th circuit was too ignorant to know law is law not emotion and social justice. 

    A 5th grader could read the law and know what it is saying. It is a plain as day is from night. 

  • Well the Biden administration's argument is contrary to past Court ruling. 

    They ruled that Trump could not end an Obama era policy that was installed by executive order. 

     

    So how could they possibly Grant Biden a win here based on his claim that the courts are usurping the president's authority?

     

    The Biden admins argument is flawed if the Trump era ruling was correct and Obama's DACA was forced on Trump when Trump's goal in ending it was to force Congress to do their job!!

  • The Supreme Court should rule that all illegals, America hating liberals, the likes of George Sorryass and Democrats, remain in Mexico permanently.

  • Lying Joe Biden or Barack Obama's Hand Puppet has done absolutely NOTHING to strengthen the USA since taking office.  In fact, Lying Joe has done everything possible to oppress and hurt the American People!  The Supreme Court had better get to work fast and then hold the Executive Branch in contempt and arrest those who ignore federal law or we are headed for an absolute disaster!

  • After a year of this.....finally? And with all the undependable so called conservatives on the court, what could we expect?

  • FJB !! THIS MONSTER AND HIS DEMONICRAT PARTY HAVE DONE OVER 70 GHOST FLIGHTS AT NIGHT DROPPING OFF THOUSANDS OF ILLEGALS AND AFGANS UNVETTED INTO OUR COUNTRY GIVING THESE INVADERS OUR STOLEN TAX DOLLARS AND CELL PHONES THAT WE PAY FOR ON OUR PHONE BILLS !! HOW DAMN LONG ARE WE GOING TO PUT UP WITH THIS UNREVERSEABLE DAMGA TO OUR COUNTRY FROM THESES EVIL LOWLIFES CALLED DEMOCRATS AND RINO'S !!

  • THEY NEED TO ALL GO BACK WHERE THEY CAME FROM.

  • THEY TOLD HIM TO DO IT HE DID NOT IS THAT NOT AGAINST OUR CONSTITUTION?

  • It is difficult to find legal standing for the Supreme Court to hear this case...  How is it arguable that an ILLEGAL ALIEN should be permitted to enter the US at all?   How does this case have any standing in a US Court... there is no legal basis for an alien, illegally in our country, to claim standing in our courts, let alone the SCOTUS.  How does an Alien whose presence in our courts is fundamentally unlawful, obtain standing for a hearing in our courts at all?  Deportation should be automatic and any application for admittance made at the US Embassy nearest the alien's legal domicile... not in the USA.

    Have we gone completely mad... insane?  The pettifoggers and judiciary who granted this case standing need to be stripped of their licenses to practice law and the remainder of the Judiciary and BAR informed that bringing such cases before the court will result in sanctions, fines, and ultimately disbarment.  It is quite obvious America has fundamental issues of competency in the legal system. This case should have no STANDING IN LAW and any precedent permitting standing is likewise fiat law... given inappropriate access to our courts.

    • You make so much sense, have you considered running for President? I honestly think I would vote for you.

This reply was deleted.