Many thanks to Karen Bracken and Dr. Lora Chamberlain for their efforts in defining a straightforward and immediate call to action.. They are truly warriors that are dedicated to exposing these corrupt acts. They have teamed up to craft an immediate action that everyone can (and must) do.

Take the actions that they advocate, but do NOT just do what they recommend once. Make those phone calls every day, even multiple times per day.

In addition to the calls advocated by Karen and Dr. Lora, please also contact every media outlet on the planet.

more info here:

TO: The People of Our World and all Sovereign Nations
CC: World Health Assembly representatives
CC: The WHO and the United Nations


The International Health Regulations (IHR) was adopted by 194 member states of the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2005. They enable the WHO to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) if it decides that an infectious disease outbreak has occurred in a member state, but with the consent of the member state. The World Council for Health (WCH) acknowledges this aspect of the current regulations because it recognizes the sovereignty of nations that adopted the IHR. But that is about to change.

Key Issues to Understand

On January 18th 2022, the United States Department of Health and Human Services proposed amendments to the IHR. These amendments give control over the declaration of a public health emergency in any member state to the WHO Director-General – even over the objection of the member state. The Director-General communicated the text of the proposed amendments on 20 January 2022, via a circular letter to State Parties. 

The proposed IHR amendments also cede control to WHO “regional directors,” who are given the authority to declare a Public Health Emergency of Regional Concern (PHERC). Moreover, the proposed amendments allow the Director-General to ring an international alarm bell, by unilaterally issuing an “Intermediate Public Health Alert (IPHA).”

Properly understood, the proposed IHR amendments are directed towards establishing a globalist architecture of worldwide health surveillance, reporting, and management. Consistent with a top-down view of governance, the public will not have opportunities to provide input or criticism concerning the amendments. This, of course, is a direct violation of the basic tenets of democracy and can be compared to the separate new pandemic treaty.

Summary of Selected Proposed Amendments to the IHR

The WHO intends to amend 13 IHR articles: 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 18, 48, 49, 53, 59

  1. Increased surveillance: Under Article 5, the WHO will develop early warning criteria that will allow it to establish a risk assessment for a member state, which means that it can use the type of modeling, simulation, and predictions that exaggerated the risk from Covid-19 over two years ago. Once the WHO creates its assessment, it will communicate it to inter-governmental organizations and other member states.
  2. 48-hour deadline: Under Articles 6, 10, 11, and 13, a member state is given 48 hours to respond to a WHO risk assessment and accept or reject on-site assistance. However, in practice, this timeline can be reduced to hours, forcing it to comply or face international disapproval lead by the WHO and potentially unfriendly member states. 
  3. Secret sources: Under Article 9, the WHO can rely on undisclosed sources for information leading it to declare a public health emergency. Those sources could include Big Pharma, WHO funders such as the Gates Foundation and the Gates-founded-and-funded GAVI Alliance, as well as others seeking to monopolize power.
  4. Weakened Sovereignty: Under Article 12, when the WHO receives undisclosed information concerning a purported public health threat in a member state,  the Director-General may (not must) consult with the  WHO Emergency Committee and the member state. However, s/he can unilaterally declare a potential or actual public health emergency of international concern. The Director General’s authority replaces national sovereign authority. This can later be used to enforce sanctions on nations.
  5. Rejecting the amendments: Under Article 59, after the amendments are adopted by the World Health Assembly, a member state has six months to reject them. This means November, this year. If the member state fails to act, it will be deemed to have accepted the amendments in full.  Any rejection or reservation received by the Director-General after the expiry of that period shall have no force and effect.

The World Council for Health’s Position On Proposed IHR Amendments

The WCH opposes the unnecessary and dystopian move toward centralized control of public health. This proven harmful model assumes that only one entity, WHO, understands how to manage the health policy of every state – and by implication, the health of each and every individual. It also assumes, incorrectly, that Big Pharma’s controversial model of medicine which is the WHO’s preferred model – is the expert guide to better health and wellness. 

These proposed IHR amendments will be voted upon at the next World Health Assembly, which will take place in Geneva, May 22 to 28, 2022. The official agenda item is 16.2. It is not clear if the event will be broadcast for transparency. Thus, the WCH believes that it is essential to campaign against the proposed amendments and to build alternative pathways.


read more here:



WE THE PEOPLE Must Take Action Together






You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Email me when people reply –


  • Just another piece of paper... Very similar to the worthless document Neville Chamberlain waved around in 1938 that was supposed to guarantee “Peace For Our Time”. Another example might be: the non-aggression pact signed by Hitler and Stalin.

    The best example is our Constitution and its Bill of Rights as interpreted by the Democratic Party. To democrats the Constitution has served as an intolerable obstruction to their agenda for decades if not longer. It prohibits almost everything that they envision for America. In recent years however, they’ve been able to nullify any provision that prevents them from increasing the power of government and decreasing the freedom of the individual. The only amendment that the democrats are solidly behind is the 16th.

    As for the Bill Gates owned World Health Organization and their latest document: WHEN we replace the totalitarian regime that has control of America at the moment, that document can be incinerated along with Bill Gates as well.


    • While I must agree, God forbid we see a breach of due process, to satisfy an irritant impatience.

      The bloodshed is a precious refreshment to the Tree of Liberty.

      Something to dread, yet perhaps unavoidable.

      Opt 2 Tree of Liberty Blood of Patriots & Tyrants Thomas | Etsy

  • How, exactly, do we "oppose" this? If we as individuals have no say and we as groups are ignored and our elections are rigged in favor of those representatrives who want this, how, exactly, do we oppose it. Is it time to take ups arms for another civil war? If there are other truely effective alternatives, I'd like to hear about them! Sounding the alarm so that more people contact indifferent congressmen and women, who could care less about how many citizens are outraged, is a pointless waste of time unless you are recruiting people for the kind of conflict that would force these power-mad little dictators to bend to our will..

    • Call and put your office holders on the spot for their  support or opposition (and frankly for any other congressional action) by asking the intern if the office holder who supported /opposed the issue- what actions are intended to correct it. The excuse that Congressional leadership leaves no choice provides you with the entre to explain their direct participation to represent the USAs interests is what they were elected for, and accountability is promised forthcoming at the ballot box, regardless.

      You mention their alibi wished for, to enable office holder inaction in slam-dunk issues (do I need to list them?). Every eye, especially after the "2000 mules" debut, shall be trained on the election process. Enemies of the Nation are brazen, but just how suicidally stupid would they be to attempt a 2020 repeat without cover of anonymity or benefit of doubt, with a clued electorate?

      The fraud is now known, and participants are on notice, whether they admit it or not. Get intense friend.

  • I HAVE NOT AND WILL NOT COMPLY with any of this nonsense!!!!!  When I see people in store lines standing 6 feet or more apart I just step into the first gap and ignore the dirty looks and snide comments!!!!!  I have no fear because the covid fear is mostly propaganda and I don't listen to the propaganda nor fear covid!!!!!  I have supposedly been exposed numerous times but have not caught it!!!!!  I believe Almighty God is protecting me!!!!!  I am 72, haven't been sick since 1976, the only time in my life I ever took a flu shot!!!!!  About 5 days later I came down with the worst case of flu in my life, missed 3 weeks of work!!!!!  Since then I have refused to get a flu shot and WILL NOT let them inject the covid poisons into my body!!!!!!!!!!

    • I'm 64 and I'm just like you Bob. I have never had a flew shot and will not allow that poison they are pushing on us to be put into my body.

  • No subordination of National Sovereignty is acceptable.

    The USA owns and determines itself, by the grace of God.

    • Skeptical, AMEN  AMEN  AMEN  AMEN  AMEN!!!!!  I WILL NOT COMPLY with their tyrannical edicts!!!!!!!!!!


    • Thank you.


    I just sent the automated e-mails and it is very easy. If you don't want more emails and texts from this group, make sure to uncheck the boxes!

This reply was deleted.