Justices Alito, Gorsuch, and Thomas dissented from the denial. Call again. And again. Flood the lines. At least they’re getting an immediate reaction from us!

CALL THE SUPREME COURT! (UPDATE phone system down!) keep it coming
8586711899?profile=RESIZE_584xread more here:


Supreme Court Denies Review Of Pennsylvania Election Challenge As “Moot”


Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch dissent, arguing the cases are not moot because, in Alito’s dissent, “the cases now before us are not moot. There is a ‘reasonable expectation’ that the parties will face the same question in the future.”

No surprise here. The Supreme Court has refused to accept a case challenging the Pennsylvania election result, on the basis that the mail-in ballot procedures were illegal, as “moot”.


The Order recites:

The motions of Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. for leave to intervene as petitioner are dismissed as moot. The motions of Thomas J. Randolph, et al. for leave to intervene as respondents are dismissed as moot. The motion of Honest Elections Project for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae in No. 20–542 is granted. The motion of White House Watch Fund, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae in No. 20–574 is granted. The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.

Justice Thomas, dissenting, argued the Court should take the case:

The Constitution gives to each state legislature authority to determine the “Manner” of federal elections. Art. I, §4, cl. 1; Art. II, §1, cl. 2. Yet both before and after the 2020 election, nonlegislative officials in various States took it upon themselves to set the rules instead. As a result, we received an unusually high number of petitions and emergency applications contesting those changes. The petitions here present a clear example. The Pennsylvania Legislature established an unambiguous deadline for receiving mail-in ballots: 8 p.m. on election day. Dissatisfied, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended that deadline by three days. The court also ordered officials to count ballots received by the new deadline even if there was no evidence—such as a postmark—that the ballots were mailed by election day. That decision to rewrite the rules seems to have affected too few ballots to change the outcome of any federal election. But that may not be the case in the future. These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set election rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable.

* * *

read more here:

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Email me when people reply –


  • Sooner the repast of days long lost doth a petty people regard their fate at last… in the dim light of fawning dawn comes wisdom too late.

    Why comes the Harold of peace and glory to the stage no more; whose faithful voice will now resound with the clarion call of hope and a better day? Look no more to the halls of justice, to the lackeys call… No more, to the captains of our liberty, for they are long-buried… and hollow is their memory… among our children.

    Nay, the reaper waits to thrust in his cycle one last time… too, draw out the remaining men of steel, no more to seed another generation… Look not to the right nor the left, for thy help; there is no repast... for the despot’s hand has bought them all… All, in the land. A terrible price was paid by greater men than thee, for thy liberty… Thus, the Lord now commands: Go My children to a better place, where harbors long seeded wait... for thee. Too, those with an eye to see and an ear to hear, I say too America ado… ado.

    Sing now the song of sorrows long… for the widows do, and look now to thy child, for it needs you… Peace for the wise rests in more than the lies of wretched men… it is anchored in the knowledge of God’s certain voice... the delight of His eternal promise is the foundation of the Faithfull’s repast… their sweet delight and a better day.

    Think long upon these somber words… for in them are the alchemy of tomorrow’s day... where judgment will no longer rest in the wickedness of the past, in the breast of the unjust soul. Behold, make straight the way of the Lord, bind up the brokenhearted and mend thy paths, for straight is the way and narrow the road that leadeth unto righteousness and its reward... Amen.

  • We have a lawless nation governed by lawless actors.

    • Yep, thats why Trump wanted to "DRAIN THE SWAMP".

    • Truly, they do but strut and fret their hour upon the stage only to be heard no more... The grave doth take them whole, these lost souls, these lawless actors ...unfaithful to their end... A curse upon their nation is their legacy and to their children, they leave nothing but empty promises and broken oaths, failed harvests, and empty fields... Poverty and misery they bequeath to their families...

      Woe unto these corrupt souls... whose Justice is rendered with a dagger and the feltching of their neighbor's treasure is a national pastime.  Ever learning but never able to come to the knowledge of the Truth... They are but broken cisterns long devoid of their waters... worthless vessels in a dry desert... yet, they do strut and fret their hour... in vanity, they seek eternity's hand in all the wrong places... in the natural order among the lost... they have no rest in all their labors... they are blind.

  • Thank you Colonel.  I do not know what the justices are being told.  How do you recommend that we move forward on your suggestions?

    • We must write Congress and actively engage our State Legislatures to demand an Article 5 Convention to Amend the Constitution... to pass term limits, a recall of the current federal government subject to new elections, and the modification or repeal of the 14th,16th, and 17th Amendments. Other amendments such as a balanced budget amendment, a right to life amendment, etc can be considered also.

      see: COSAction (

      The link above will provide the information needed to assist in this movement.  We must also ask our State Legislatures to pass Anti-Commandeering legislation to disarm the Federal Governments ability to interfere with State and Individual rights... to include the activation of a State's Militia... under the State's direct control ... not the National Guard which has become the agent of the Federal Government.  

      Examples of other Acts the State's can take include... the passage of Second Amendment Protection Acts, Militia and Sheriff's Possies Act (enabling constitutional state militias under the control of the Governor and State Legislature, Grand Jury reform acts, Pettit Jury reform acts both designed to return the power of justice and the law into the hands of the people and out of the hands of increasingly corrupt prosecutors and courts/judges.  The State may also want to reclaim its legal rights to store their ARMAMENTS in the local armories ... instead of under federal control on federal property... military equipment sits away from the fiscal possession of the State's.  Without armament, and munitions, the National Guard is a paper tiger.. the creation of the National Guard Bureau under the DOD is very telling... on who commands the NG.  States may need to begin funding more of their National Guard as federal funds and equipment bring with them restrictions on its use.

      Get the State Legislatures to remove State Attorney Generals who will not actively and aggressively pursue State and Citizens rights... by filing cases under the 9h and 10th amendment... flood the Federal Courts with hundreds if not thousands of actions aimed at restricting federal power to those in Article 1. Section 8 and 9... and NO MORE... the fictional and imagined powers assumed by the Federal Government all need to be challenged... over and over is necessary until the Federal Government is beaten back by the sheer volume to operate within the restraints of the US Constitution.

      Pass resolutions that inform the Federal Agencies like the BLM that they no longer have the authority to regulate STATE LANDS... all property within the State's Borders not Ceded by an act of the State Legislature and approved by the GOvernor are the soverign property and jurisdiction of the State... not the Federal Government... and only that land under Article 1, Section 8, clause 17 shall be lawfully transferred.  The several states should be receiving all the revenues generated from these so-called federal lands... grazing fees, mineral and oil leases, timber sales, etc. all belong to the states... that ought to get the state legislatures' attention.  The Federal Government was never to have sizeable landholdings within the states.... federal territories and those constitutionally ceded lands are their entire lawful holdings... the states need to serve eviction notices on them.

      Other rights that must be reasserted by the states thru direct legislation, funding, and legal action include... protecting their state's BORDERS from illegal entry... informing DHS/INS/Border Patrol that the State will now defend its borders against the mass migration from the south... an INVASION of illegal aliens will not be permitted to enter their state... and the State will deport such detained individuals the Federal Government is not defending the State against invasion as required by article 4, section 4. The several states have the constitutional duty to defend their citizens against invasion and domestic violence until the Federal Government DEMONSTRATES it will take such action to protect the State from INVASION.  



      Convention of States Action
      Article V offers the only constitutional solution as big as the problem. Together, we can end federal overreach.
    • while I believe we at least need to try I have NO confidence the COS will do any good.  the corrupt dictators will just ignore it the way they ignore the Constitution now.  The only way for a COS to succeed is to remove the corrupt people but then it wouldn't be needed.  We the People are in a catch 22 situation!!!!!

    • Yes, Bob... we must try.  However, I like you have many reservations for an Article 5 Convention... as to its powers to rewrite the Constitution and its effectiveness in getting the numbers needed to ratify any Amendments it authors by convention.  Yet, it is one of the few legal routes to reform we have... so, we must try.

    • For my 2 cents, given a choice of risking:

      • Shooting yourself in the foot
      • someone else picking the placement

      I know my preference!

      That is what self-empowerment is all about.

      There's No Doubt About It. Kids Are Weird.

    • Bob, I'd say all of us experience the frustration I detect in your post. But the dilemmas' effectiveness depends on the Peoples hesitation to act other than in faith and trust in the social compact between the People and its' governments.  This consent is granted to government for common benefit.

      Yet we now have two parties of self-serving, polarized extremes, resulting in common injury to all but our adversaries benefit. This dangerous gridlock is compounded by a Judiciary lacking Constitutional fidelity.

      A solution is a refusal to comply with a hostage status quo.

      States are even now exploring ways to individually declare to the federal usurpers, that they will: not recognize, nor act upon, and even arrest Federal executors of unconstitutional law or action, normally afforded benefit of legal doubt until discredited.

      A Convention of States spirit and intent shows as an S.O.S. . It says plainly to the Federal government, "You are not serving us, but are injuring us (whatever federal reason does not excuse or signify). We have assumed your government role in desperation to salvage ourselves".

      If the central government strives to disregard or corrupt such an expression, do you think the People, after speaking so directly, will meekly aquiesce and simply hope for the best?  

      Rather I think, the People at the more easily manageble government state and local levels, will simply nullify Federal authority where unconstitutional or usurpative, but act as a Union where Constitutional and rational. This offers remedy, but is not long sustainable being caustic to the notion of 'Union'. With Federal realignment, benefit of legal doubt could be restored.

      If the Federal military finally acts forcefully to extract acceptance and compliance, then it is a civil war, but not by our making or initiating.

This reply was deleted.