ADMIN

>/p> 9329723873?profile=RESIZE_710x

 

 

 

According to the United States Capitol Police Oversight Page:

Oversight The United States Capitol Police (USCP) is overseen by the Capitol Police Board and has Congressional oversight by appropriations and authorizing committees from the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate. This oversight affords the Department the support and opportunity to continually ensure that the USCP meets the safety and security needs of the Congress, the staff, and the many visitors who come to the United States Capitol each day.

read more here: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/capitol-police-ordered-arrest-staff-visitors-not-wearing-masks

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • it's a great idea that pelosi wear a mask. children scream in terror whenever she's on tv

  • Has anyone including Fauci, the CDC, the WHO, or any other Scientific Authority actually displayed "Proof" that those Face Masks (cloth or paper) actually prevent as a barrier any type virus from passing? The answer is a most definite "NO!" It is impossible as the openings in either type of mask measure between .03-.05 microns, and all Virus' widths measure between .003-.005 microns! That is a bit like putting up a Chain Link Fence to Keep Out Mosquitoes! Ain't gonna work, and it don't matter how many fences you put up, one behind the other! If you're sick, running a fever, cophing and sneezing then Wear One While Staying Home, to prevent others from becoming ill contacting the drops of moisture containing your virus! The Virus doesn't need moisture to survive, it can survive "Dry and Dormant." It needs moisture to replicate.

    Lynn Bryant DeSpain

  • If the capitol police want to wear mask , then they should but don't force us into wearing them just  to make them look powerful.

  • Skeptical,

    At that time the Sun Never Set on the British Flag. Under that Flag was All the King's Turf! The World's Largest Navy transporting the Armies assured Compliance. We, the Colonists, resisted and Won because the King failed to Keep Covenance with the Magna Carta, the Agreement that "All Men, including the King, must abide by the Law." The King divided and created seperate Laws between the American Colonies and England. With France though the Plagues had basically ended "Serfdom" it remained a "Land of Titled Estates" enforced through the Powers of Rome. Humane Greed combined with periods of famine created the situation of overwhelming starving masses annihilating relatively few Rich Elites. Which created the Age Old Question, "How large an Army does it take to defend France?" "No one knows. Its never been done." My point and similarity is that Our Political Masters at the moment would perhaps best be served meeting their "Ends" as those in the French Revolution, as we occupy the same Lands, and it is "They" who are "Creating the Divisions." Perhaps too bloody for this Modern Days.

    Lynn Bryant DeSpain

    • Still, the King was not at hand, to be taken in hand, and to do so that would have required invading a fortified country long distance. Other than by surgical operation (assassination), impractical.

      The same impracticality worked to the Crowns disadvantage, in waging a destructive war long distance, with depleted resources           (remember the excuse for taxation?).

      But both Charles and Louis presented never ending threats (being status quo) to their protestors due to proximity, unless their presences were changed permenently.

      Please do not be taken aback by my interest. You showed me an interesting idea to be examined (I would not have bothered if otherwise). Thank you.

      And in application to todays issues, I have stated in the past here and elsewhere, that capital punishment ought to be mandated for the heinous global and domestic criminalities of genocide, and upheaval of civilization by perpetrators here, and abroad.

      -just me

  • We Americans were far more Civilized towards the British in Our Revolution than the French were to their Monarchy and Fellow Rulers in Theirs! I am beginning to admire the French.

    Lynn Bryant DeSpain

    • We need to stand up to the dictator communist democrats.

    • Perhaps. But I note that the English colonists were remote from the Monarchy during the confrontation, and needed only to prosecute a resistance.

      The French protestors lived on the Kings home turf, and could not expect a conclusion until he was sent into that good night.

      "A Slight Freshness on the Neck": Prints Depicting the Execution of Louis XVI (ca. 1793) - The ...

      The English King Charles I, was also home based on the battlefield, and suffered a similar sharp conclusion.

      WHITE KING: CHARLES I - TRAITOR, MURDERER, MARTYR - Chalke ...

      This suggests to me that the genocidal NWO instigators abroad, will need to be sought for. But the local lackeys

      should consider they are easily reachable for a historically demonstrated local reaction to despotism.

  • I have no words to describe these DESPICABLE demoncrats at least none I can say in public

  • Congressional Immunity Law and Legal Definition

    Congressional immunity refers to a special immunity that is granted to members of Congress. The following are the exemptions granted to the members of Congress under congressional immunity :

    1. A Congress member is exempted from arrest while attending a session of the body to which the member belongs, excluding an arrest for treason, breach of the peace, or a felony, or;

    2.A Congress member is exempted from arrest or interrogation for any speech or debate entered into during a legislative session.

    In In re Grand Jury, 821 F.2d 946 (3d Cir. Pa. 1987), it was held that congressional immunity is an evidentiary privilege that is applied broadly to evidence or testimony about all acts that occur in the regular course of the legislative process. It therefore applies to activity taken in the course of legislative fact-finding.
This reply was deleted.