ADMIN

8655714877?profile=RESIZE_400x

Judicial Watch announced today that it has filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Defense for records about House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s January 8, 2021, telephone call with Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Defense (No 1:21-cv-00593)).

Pelosi acknowledged the call in a January 8 letter to her Democratic colleagues. In the letter, Pelosi purportedly related her discussion with Milley earlier that same day: “This morning, I spoke to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley to discuss available precautions for preventing an unstable president from initiating military hostilities or accessing the launch codes and ordering a nuclear strike. The situation of this unhinged President could not be more dangerous, and we must do everything that we can to protect the American people from his unbalanced assault on our country and our democracy.” 

The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia after the Defense Department failed to respond to a January 11, 2021, Freedom of Information (FOIA) request for:

  1. Any and all records regarding, concerning, or related to the telephone call between House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and General Mark Milley on or about January 8, 2021. This request includes, but is not limited to, any and all transcripts, recordings, and/or summaries of the call, as well as any other records produced in preparation for, during, and/or pursuant to the call.
  1. Any and all additional records of communication between Gen. Milley and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi between November 1, 2020 and the present.

read more here: https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/pelosi-pentagon-chief/

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • "unstable president", "military hostilities"? ... She can't mean the gaff guy who within three weeks started hostilities in syria and has Russia and China scrambling for world domination?  Nah, just giving power back to them underdogs

  • Ya know, it's as if the 25th Amendment gambit aimed at President Trump,

    was a political innoculation to build up resistance

    to an actual 25th Amendment action needed

    on the replacement-intended

    Deep State President.

     

    Despotism seems medically oriented these days.

    We are not seeing common-sense decency with prudent action in political actions by our servants.

    • Also, I think we should not be so surprised by the apparent deterioration time has wrought upon Nancy.

      The visual ravages are probably the after effects of excessively chasing ice cream with hard liquour.

       

  • Thank goodness for Judicial Watch.  If the President is unhinged (which he may be as well as being cognitively challenged), it's time for the 25th amendment!

  • Yes this at a minimum, but it wil  not amount to much. Pelosi and Co. are well protected both globally and nationally.  If we the people don't remove her she'll naturally die in office.  She is a viper. 

  • Nancy is a vindictive old woman that has become a threat to the republic . Retire Nancy !!!!!!

  • Good Luck getting this info anytime soon perhaps in the next 25 years. Intentions are good but there is an abundace of corruption we are destroying ourselves from within  

  • Nancy need to get another job or retire because she is getting to old for this job.

  • The problem is that these things take forever and in the mean time the illegal president is destroying our country - of course with the aid of the Witch of the West!!

    • Thats why early on while Joe was rubberstamping everything thrown in front of him, I said fortunately he had a limited time to run amok. Horribly, Congress at the federal level, and the states closer to home, will have to restrain this man with a "80 million vote mandate" for self-preservations sake. Progressive Socialist insanity is going for broke (and by broke I mean our economy).

This reply was deleted.