ADMIN

7398474483?profile=RESIZE_710x

According to the media's general judgment, 2020 U.S. voters are most concerned with purportedly complex issues of crime and justice. Voters should place no trust in this. This same media forbade itself to investigate a simple, yet objectively historic corruption scandal of national interest.

Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) has almost certainly committed the most extensive spree of felonies by a congressperson in U.S. history. As a criminal, she also appears to be historically inept. Scores of verified items of evidence against her are in the public record. Omar has never challenged their authenticity and has never produced a single piece of evidence to support her version of events.

She faces a primary on Tuesday. She again won her party's endorsement. She again won House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's endorsement — and her funding.

The mainstream media judges this remarkable situation to be irrelevant to Minnesota voters, let alone the dominant concern. Editorial malpractice on issues of crime, justice, and the 2020 election spreads everywhere this summer; by no coincidence, the spread can be traced to irresponsible media coverage of a deadly riot in Rep. Omar's district.

Below are 32 new, verifiable, archived pieces of evidence of Omar's historic crime spree.

* * * * *

 7398646879?profile=RESIZE_710x

* * * * *

Above: One of many Somali-language tributes to "Colonel Nur Said Elmi," Rep. Ilhan Omar's father, sent from around the world by family, friends, and contacts following his tragic June 2020 death from a COVID-19 infection. As a high-ranking officer in Somalia's (U.S.-backed) military from the 1970s until 1991, he was well known by this name and title.

* * * * *

In mid-June, Ilhan Omar's father tragically died from a COVID-19 infection. Expressions of grief, condolences, and prayers arrived from around the world, but particularly from the Somali-speaking immigrant community of Minneapolis and from the U.K. By all accounts, he earned his reputation as a gentle, kind neighbor, well known and beloved within Cedar-Riverside, as he had been in Somalia.

His relevance to Rep. Omar's landmark scandal is, of course, his birth name. Upon arriving in the United States in 1995, he claimed to be "Nur Omar Mohamed" and received a Social Security number with this name. However, all appeared to know him as Nur Said. He presented himself as Nur Said. Both Ilhan and her sister Sahra Noor referred to their father as Nur Said (prior to deleting the evidence). He is identified on-screen as "Nur Said, Ilhan's father" in the 2018 documentary film "Time for Ilhan" and again as "Nur Said" in the credits. Twice.

Most importantly, British citizen Leila Nur Said Elmi declared her father to be "Nur Said Elmi, military officer" on her 1997 marriage application. (Click the link to see the application and a photo of Leila Nur Said Elmi with both Ilhan and Nur Said.)

read the rest here: https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/ilhan-omar-must-resign-new-evidence-from-nearly-three-dozen-somalis-reveals-a-probable-spree-of-felonies

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center

Email me when people reply –

Replies

    • What terrorist riots? Trump took care of everything. No more chaos, riots and fiscal disarray that we witnessed under Obama. Who wants to go back to those years. I sure don't. Every American can see what a great job Trump has done. How come you can't see it? 

    • It can take as little as 6 months to become a US Citizen... the Russians can send over truckloads of commies along with the Chinese... millions more socialist come from South of the Border and before you know it we are all wearing gray flannel PJ's with funny hats with a Red Star.  Treason, sedition, insurrection, massive immigration from known socialist states millions more pouring in along our Southern border and viola...

      we are singing 'The International'   https://www.bing.com/search?q=The+Internationale&form=ANNTH1&am...

       

      The Internationale - Bing
    • I just became an citizen about a year a go and I know when I became a citizen I would never vote for a Democrats because what they stand for.

       

    • Good for you, Jeff. You see what is and has been going on. You found a great place to learn, in TPCC.

    • Congratulations! Where did you immigrate from? How long have you been in the states? What kind of visa did you have? 

    • Well, congratulations to you, Jeff! A new, naturalized citizen that isn't going to work to destroy this country, and all it has stood for for decades.

      is it perfect? Are we perfect? No! Of course not! But we are a cut above the rest! And thank God for that❗️🇺🇸👏🇺🇸‼️

      i know naturalized citizens that go with whatever their ethnic background group wants to go with. I know some who, despite warning them that would be the wrong choice for our country and the reasons why, voted for Barry Sotero aka Barack Obama - TWICE! They wanted to come to this wonderful country and I don't blame them, I understand why, but they do not understand what made this country great, and how they're going to turn it into the type of country they fled from. No matter how I've tried to tell them they just couldn't see it. This is the kind of people we wouldn't want to become citizens and be eligible to vote here. But you, Jeff, are the kind we would want. So I congratulate you and thank you and encourage you to Rise up with a loud voice and tell other naturalized citizens, and even birthright citizens, why you think the way you do and why you want this country to remain what it was - honest and strong and God-fearing and biblical, and with the biblical part and the God-fearing part we have been the most generous, compassionate, loving and giving people on the face of the earth. Whenever there's a crisis anywhere in the world Americans have been always the first ones to step up and say: what can we do to help? how can we give? and giving as much as we can for as long as is needed,  to help people in crisis. Now we are in crisis, and who is there to help us or to stand up for us or defend us! ⁉️ None that I have heard! Only criticism from other peoples! I thank  God that we have God that will hear our prayers. And none other!

      so, again, congratulations, and well done! And stay with it ❗️🇺🇸👍❗️

    • All they argue is precedence of case law, not the foundations of our documents. 

    • Jea Precedent or case law becomes .. settled law... or law by Judicial fiat.  We are no longer a nation of settled law it is always up for argument... arbitrary verdicts based on the ability of lawyers to argue their cases... not necessarily the facts or the law.  We have become a failed state... I am afraid it is over, the conservatives are even ok with their leaders picking and choosing which laws to enforce and HOW TO ENFORCE or interpret them.

      The rule of law is whatever the Judge decides it is... so much for justice.

    • Col., Do you think, as I have written Trump a couple of times on the illegality of courts to issue anything on immigration, and a few other things, don't remember all of them. 

      So for example, McCarren Walter gave the President the ultimate authority to keep out the rif raf, in his 1st E.O. The 9th struck it down like the commies they are.

      Art. III gives the courts NO jurisdiction in immigration, it is all left to the Legislature, to set up ICE, as they did, and to pay ICE to do the job as written in their structural guiidelines, (don't know what to call it). Is there ANY reason that Trump couldn't have just said, NO, it is not in your jurisdiction to rule OR to hear immigration cases, Read the Constitution Art III, I will not read it to you, and say, I will NOT submit MY executive authority, given to me by MW Act, 1952, which I WILL read to you. In other words (or other), mind your own damn busines.

      Could not he do this?

    • Short answer... yes, he can refuse to accept any Court decision he disagrees with ... it is then up to Congress to IMPEACH if he is seriously violating the law or to agree with the President by doing nothing or by referendum affirming the President.  They may also decide to change the law to make it clearer on the issue in dispute.  However, the President may refuse such an attempt to override his Constitutional powers to enforce the laws as he deems appropriate and to govern his administration as he deems proper.

This reply was deleted.