I've concluded that these "green" policies are really intended to kill people off. They get people to agree because they claim to want to "save the planet", but they don't even do that.
They foolishly and quickly reduce access to energy and food and water, in ways we never voted for, because they don't tell us the practical impact. That's why they won't debate them.
Did you ever agree to give up meat forever? I didn't. That is the goal of these policies both here and in the European Union.
Did you ever agree to a war on farmers? I sure didn't. They feed us. Dutch farmers are fighting for their lives, but they also provide the food to the world, so if they go down, many will starve.
Electric cars with a limited energy grid mean not being able to travel or get goods we really need, because solar and wind are not able to provide the amount we need.
We saw that clearly in Texas when they had a cold spell. Diesel is almost gone in the US, which affects all deliveries and the farmers again.
And what about the military? Without fuel, planes cannot fly, ships cannot mobilize.
Someone needs to stand up and speak up before it's too late.
Charlie Kirk recently suggested that states could take action independently of the federal government, but they better do it soon.
States could protect their own borders. States could develop their own resources and develop policies to protect their people.
The Constitution gives the states rights they are not fully using, but they could.
Replies