ADMIN

35 Attorney General Barr & John Durham ideas | barr, attorney general,  politicsToday, Special Counsel John Durham provided a “discovery Update” to the court in the Michael Sussmann case. In this filing, available here, he disclosed that his team has obtained a tremendous amount of information ranging from a variety of sources – including Perkins Coie, the Hillary Clinton Campaign, and former DNC/Clinton lawyer Mark Elias.

While Sussmann has been charged with giving false statements to then-FBI General Counsel James Baker regarding the Alfa Bank/Trump Organization hoax (background here), Durham notes that the “Government also maintains an active, ongoing criminal investigation of” Sussmann’s conduct.

In other words, Sussmann’s criminal conduct likely is not limited to false statements. There is more. If we are to make an educated guess, it may have to do with the conspiracy to accuse the Trump Organization of having secret back-channel communications with Alfa Bank. We discussed the potential for a conspiracy charge here.

Now, to the evidence. Durham and his team have secured grand jury testimony from:

  1. Former Perkins Coie partner, and DNC/Hillary Clinton lawyer Marc Elias.

  2. Former FBI General Counsel James Baker

  3. Current CIA employees

Durham and his team have completed interviews of the following individuals:

  1. Former FBI General Counsel James Baker

  2. More than 24 other current and former FBI employees.

  3. Current and former employees of the CIA and DARPA.

  4. 12 Employees of the “internet companies” referenced in the Sussmann indictment.

  5. The former chairman of DNC/Clinton law firm Perkins Coie.

  6. A former employee of the Clinton campaign.

  7. Current and former employees of Georgia Tech (involved in the Alfa Hoax).

  8. An employee of “Tech Executive-1” – aka Rodney Joffe, a Sussmann client who assisted with the Alfa Bank hoax

read more:

https://technofog.substack.com/p/durham-dnc-lawyer-marc-elias-has

You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!

Join Command Center

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I'd like to have a $ for every "I don't recall " in that bunch of interviews. 

  • IF durham was interested in draining the swamp he would have done so long ago!!!!!  He is just using more smoke and mirrors to hide his corrp[tion and complicity with the deep state!!!!!!!!!!

  • Use all these individuals to get data on the BOs and the Clintons.  Deals for substantiated data.  Get the main characters and charge them individually with treason.  You can just imagine the data-leaves that fall from the trees.  Could the DNC implode?  Fully?

  • I will still be surprised if anything comes of it.

    • Bob and Janet, if I had to bet on the outcome, I'd bet with you.  But then again, when everyone could find no photo/video of him and they doubted he even existed, he sent a report.  Then, when he was quiet for a long time, the old doubts arose.  This happened again 3 or 4 more times, but with Sussman, reports are now occurring more often.  The names of those questioned under oath are no longer speculated, they are listed.  The names of those questioned, but not under oath, are no longer generally assumed, they are listed.  When, or if, the data is all aligned and readied, will we begin to see court cases?  It probably depends upon who occupies the WH.  If a Republican occupies the WH, it all depends whether or not the US AG is a RINO or not. If the US AG is a RINO, then it depends if the POTUS has the intelligence to fire the US AG and hire a Trump-thinking person.  There are too many “ifs” involved to make me comfortable, especially when we consider the last election’s fraud, et al.

This reply was deleted.