Replies

    • You perceive. But the China of Mao is not the China altered by Deng Xiouping. This China has been bootstrapped by the NWO WTO standing into a position of first world assets, even if the intellectual resources are not currently resident (although proud, they steal the innovation of others). Instead of being done a favour to reduce surplus populations in an exchange, they just might feel hesitent, especially if they look foreward to promised moon and stars by the WEF. China has always been expansionist regarding territory, and nothing new. Japan and many China-peripheral asian countries would bear that out in sharing their love of China. But I am less convinced in Mao's thuggery being scrupulously followed today up to nuclear options. Criminitly, private car ownership is becoming common now! I do think that the America-hostile fevour based in jeolousy persists. But seeing themselves on a materialistic roll, they look less ideologically zealous and more just plain greedy.

      Sorry about becoming short with you argueing with others about "mirroring" as stated by a knuckle-dragging media goon, but surely Pretender Biden suggesting that no inherent right (the Bill of Rights) is absolute, really needs our focus. The Biden China cabinet or the House Hag is what prevents this Wooden Head from suffering remedial action. The Hags hex on the House would be more likely to eliminate, but requires a change in House numbers (only three I read). Even then, do you suppose the current President of the Senate would hesitate based on statesmans ethics? But I am digressing.

    • Tell that to the PRC's military leadership and take a hard look at the facts... China is spending trillions on modernizing and equipping its military with OFFENSIVE, not DEFENSIVE systems...  And the fact remains China has 1.5 billion people... a nuclear war would leave them with a more manageable population.  As for Xiouping... his international face is not his CCP face.  China and the Chinese people have a long history of keeping their deepest feelings hidden and their expansion plans buried... pay attention to what they are doing not what they are publically stating.

    • Yes, China is indeed fluffing up its feathers with a sabre rattle to boot. Current events shows that assymetrical warfare as the contemporary way to go, with conventional wars of materiel output and military aggression as a side-show. After they self-impress, you feel the CCP will just have to put the toys to use when disagreed with?

      To my viewpoint, nuclear exchange would potentially damage all the nice infrastructure they have just gained, but possibly not act as a final extinguishment of the population. The depopulating weapon of choice that the Chinese would fear, I'd say, is a bioweapon, of particular genetic preference. That would not be a singular instantaneous expression, but one sustained and propogated in a natural environment, until mutation changes its effectiveness. No residual staying power in numbers there. Do you imagine the "James Bond" supervillans of the NWO do not intend employing such things?

      I do not see the Chinese people as being monolithic. For hard asses, they sure are taking to the decadent creature comforts. Their interest is completely discounted by many. The power hungry Communist Party members are another matter. In a final outcome, our countries fate may be inadvertently championed an unwillingness of the Chinese people to carry the monsters further.

      Some I have heard are christian.

    • The Chinese people have no effective input into what their Leaders decide to do... In general, the Asian culture defers to authority and is historically a docile people.

    • Thank you for the validation. LOL

      Still, miracles happen. Bible says so.

    • The only thing I validated is that China's leadership is not responsive to their people... and that the people (not the CCP) are docile.  China has a long history of deceptive foreign policy and international intrigue. One should not take them at their word... but rather follow their actions very closely.  China has been rapidly expanding its military presence in the world and with its 'Belt and Road' economic policy is attracting many unsuspecting third world governments to invite China to take up residence in their Nation... not a good idea.

      China claims it has a market-based economy...· China's economic system is a blend of socialism and capitalism called a socialist market economy. Under this system, the state still owns the means of production, but the market portions out resources under the careful watch of the state.  Their economy is more of a State Market System where ownership remains with the state and the investor is licensed to operate in China, using adaptive liberal rules associated with Capitalist markets and economies.  The CCP retains title to the manufacturing, wholesale and retail assets, and in a twinkling of an eye, it can revoke the license and confiscate the investor's interests.  It is a spider says to the fly market system. 

      Don't be taken in by what appears to be reform... the CCP still retains its Maoist ideology and goals of world dominance. They simply area updating their policy too attarack more acolytes, promising economic assistance and peaceful cooperation.  However, they soon find China taking control of their economy and using it to gain inroads for converting the Nation to a Maoist satellite.  

This reply was deleted.