BREAKING: Puti, I mean Biden wants to put his likely opponent Trump in jail for daring to dispute the election -- pressuring Garland to abuse power to target Trump and other political opponents: https://t.co/VWVXJq6SVr
— Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) April 2, 2022
You need to be a member of Command Center to add comments!
Replies
The Resident in the White Home,
has no where to run or hide,
or action to take to stave off his fate.
The last laugh of the Jokester is on him.
Pull my finger Joe!
Their house of cards will come down around their ears soon
Hi folks, something sticks in my mind. Way back I read that if the US ever had a treasonous government in power, the Military was to remove such government, place them in handcoffs and bring them in front of a Military Court system.Yes the Comander & chief is the head of the Military, however not when treason is commited aginst the United States & The People. If anyone knows for sure professional or Military please advise. Thanks
COMMON INTERPRETATION
Treason Clause
by Paul T. Crane
U.S. Department of Justice; Criminal Division, Appellate Section
by Deborah Pearlstein
Professor of Law and Co-Director of the Floersheimer Center for Constitutional Democracy at Yeshiva Univeristy Cardozo Law School
Treason is a unique offense in our constitutional order—the only crime expressly defined by the Constitution, and applying only to Americans who have betrayed the allegiance they are presumed to owe the United States. While the Constitution’s Framers shared the centuries-old view that all citizens owed a duty of loyalty to their home nation, they included the Treason Clause not so much to underscore the seriousness of such a betrayal, but to guard against the historic use of treason prosecutions by repressive governments to silence otherwise legitimate political opposition. Debate surrounding the Clause at the Constitutional Convention thus focused on ways to narrowly define the offense, and to protect against false or flimsy prosecutions.
Interpretation: Treason Clause | The National Constitution Center
Excerpt as the paper has 79 pages. Link attached below
Foundations For Military Intervention in the
United States*
David E. Engdahl**
I. INTRODUCTION
To the conscience of the nation that fancies itself the
world's greatest democracy, the idea of military intrusion into
the affairs of civil government is profoundly repugnant. In 1972,
for example, the United States Supreme Court, through Chief
Justice Burger, had occasion to recall "the traditional and strong
resistance of Americans to any military intrusion into civilian
affairs. That tradition has deep roots in our history . "... 1
Again in 1974, the same Chief Justice observed on behalf of the
Court that even where some form of government force is warranted, "the decision to invoke military power has traditionally
been viewed with suspicion and skepticism since it often
involves the temporary suspension of some of our most cherished rights-government by elected civilian leaders, freedom of
expression, of assembly and association."
Foundations for Military Intervention in the United States (seattle...
Martial Law in Times of Civil Disorder
18 U.S. Code § 2385 - Advocating overthrow of Government
Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or
Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or
Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.
If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.
As used in this section, the terms “organizes” and “organize”, with respect to any society, group, or assembly of persons, include the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such society, group, or assembly of persons.
Troublesome, since the description of seditious conspiracy does not include a distinction between duly-constituted government enjoying authority through consent of the People, and an evolving despotic government claiming so. With the Jeffersonian prescription of a revolution every 20 years being healthy to the body-politic, the statute is not reflective to the spirit of the Constitutional visionaries, but can easily serve to bolster entrenched government interests outside the will of the People.
True.. That's why in most Third World locals we see the use of: Coup d'état to effect sudden and violent defeat of an unpopular/corrupt Government, usually conducted by a small group, often a Military one! This is why the Democrats are working feverishly to remove the undesirables and move their loyalists into all leadership roles across the Military Chain of Command and don't forget they must disarm us crazy Citizens at all costs a.s.a.p.
Biden wants to put his likely opponent Trump in jail for daring to dispute the election -- pressuring Garland to abuse power to target Trump and other political opponents: ARE you nuts if anyone is to go to jail it is JOE BIDEN who is corrupt along with his JUNKIE son and brother and sister. Nest Corrupt Hillary Clinton along with Bill. Then at least half of the FBI and the 51 former shamed intel analysts and officials that claim that the Russian sham against Trump was real. There will be more coming out regarding the Liberal Communist Democrats regarding the rigged election.
Thank you for the input, it is a reminder to me that I myself, and other great Americans best read up again " The Constitution Of The United States".
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
of 4 Next