Eric Bolling to Radical Muslims - " You Want a Holy War ? We’ll Give You One "

Eric Bolling ended today’s Cashin’ In with a pretty bold statement: if radical Muslims are bent on carrying out a holy war against anyone who doesn’t subscribe their religious beliefs, “it just may be time to unleash hell” on them. Bolling went down a whole list of Islamic terrorist groups all over the Middle East to show just how serious of a threat it is. He said, “There’s a common denominator with these murderous thugs: they’re Islamic, they’re radical, they’re extremist, and they’re purely intolerant. It’s time to wake up.” And as far as Bolling’s concerned, the persecution of Christians and the call by one terrorist for the flag of Allah to fly at the White House just go too far.

“You want a holy war? We’ll give you one. It just may be time to unleash hell on radical Islam. Don’t worry, Islamic jihadists, your 72 virgins await.”

Rating:
  • Currently 5/5 stars.

Views: 1330

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Fair Maid on August 21, 2014 at 9:01am
Spoke like a true patriot Ronald.
Comment by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret) on August 12, 2014 at 2:44pm

Well Ted that sure was a mouth full... If you gleaned all that from reading my posts I need to seriously proof read my posts.  I don't support Obama and personally believe he is a pretender to the office of president.  I believe he must be removed as soon as possible, by Constitutional means. However, if he pursues a course that invariably leads to  absolute despotism (not far off) then the Patriot has the right and it is our duty, to remove him from office by the most expeditious means possible.

It is truly regretful that you have taken such a jaded opinion of what I stand for... I have no idea how you arrived at the conclusions you so vehemently and vociferously infer; I don't support Obama or the current Oligarchy of Establishment power in control of our government. My oath of office was taken many years ago; it remains as valid today, as it was when I gave it.  I am committed to defending the Constitution, against all enemies foreign and domestic, and to serving the People of the United States.  My oath is highly valued by me and your comments regarding my service and loyalty are not only misplaced but the mark of a man willing to slander others without principled justification.

As to the remainder of your personal insults... all I can say is that men of character don't engage in character assassination or libel.  It is regrettable that you believe as you do, but I remain consistent in my beliefs and resolve to supporting government reform thru peaceful and Constitutional means. Having seen violence and war up close, I don't want such carnage to be experienced in the homes and streets of our nation. I remain opposed to violence until it is brought to me and there is no other recourse.  Should civil war come, let it not be by the hand of the Patriot, but that of the tyrant.  Let the People arise in that day, too cast off the despot, as it is their right and duty to do so.

May temperance be our better guide and prudence our fellow companion... that sound words and good judgment may replace rash thought and harsh words. Let our discourse be of cordial but honest debate, that our words may not be latter regretted.  Patriots must first discern the truth, then with great regard for the innocent, find a path to government reform, that is most expeditious and peaceful. 

God Bless America ...

Comment by Ted I Lewis on August 12, 2014 at 1:42pm

    Ronald A Nelson Ret. Whatever. I for one will not waste my time reading your post. It is plan to see that you ret. under bamas time. And you support him! And the biggest disgrace you bring on men and womenthat are serving now. And have died serving their country? Is the FACT you forgot the OATH you took. People are coming into my country, armed! They have killed Americans! And you want to talk your bullshit! I have a feeling that your service record is nothing as you say! I know, very well, several high ranking former service personnel.  And have passed on some of your post. They think as I do. You would turn on anyone to better yourself! Or to make yourself look good. So go kiss your leaders ass some more. Jareer Abeed must really love you.

Comment by Oleg Gielman on August 12, 2014 at 11:05am

I agree with Ronald, Safety Committees must be network and act in unison.

Committees of Safety should be in every community, therefore by design they are easily manageable and managed by We The People ...We The People are communities of citizens, and citizens cannot be immoral and/or godless men.

Comment by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret) on August 12, 2014 at 10:53am

I don't mean to be curt... but just try forming a Safety Committee and using it as your authorization to engage in border security...

I guarantee you will be in jail and on your way to a permanent FEMA camp very quickly.  The government will come down on you with much more force than they do on illegal aliens.  They won't give you a citation and tell you to report to court they will arrest, incarcerate, and set a large bail ... one, you may not have the resources to cover.

One cannot simply decide to take the law in their own hands ... that is illegal and will cause you to be arrested, tried and convicted.... with all the ramifications that apply to your liberty and future rights under the Constitution to keep and bare arms. So, be careful how you act.

Comment by Ted I Lewis on August 12, 2014 at 10:24am

   OK! Simple! We form our own Safety Committees! Ours goes to the border. And make a 1/4 mile FREE FIRE ZONE ! Post signs saying so! And DO IT! Folks,  we are in a war! A shooting war! Firefights are happening!  Our country is under attack! And they are armed and shooting! Yes, innocent people are going to die! Because they know that we as a nation will not protect her! Most, and I mean people here also, have lost or never truly had the will to fight for her! I am so glad, my father is not here to see what has become of the country he loved so much! My mother also! Both fought for her, in their own way! I look back to the day 8 left for boot camp. USMC, 1968. Was not a good time for my country.  But I saw something that I had NEVER seen my dad do! As I got on the buss, he shook my hand and hugged me. When he stood back? I saw a tear in my dad's eye! And he said something I will never forget!  " THANK YOU FOR LOVING AMERICA AS MUCH AS I DO. And never forget! GOD-COUNTRY-FAMILY, in that order!" Enough, I am out.

Comment by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret) on August 12, 2014 at 9:49am

Might I suggest that Committees of Safety are only as effective as the officers on those committees... if they are corrupt and immoral the committee will also be corrupt and immoral.  Our problems are not the form of our government, as much, as they are the result of the men and women who are in government.

 

Comment by Oleg Gielman on August 12, 2014 at 9:09am
Committees of Safety keep immorality in check, by applying God's Laws.
Comment by Ronald A. Nelson Col.USA (Ret) on August 12, 2014 at 9:03am

Actually, it takes a moral people for self-government to work... the law (ordered society) must first exist in the heart of the people.  An immoral people require the force of law and the rule of the rod too restrain their conduct... both civil and commercial.  Hence, the grater the immoral conduct of a people the more restrictive and oppressive the government becomes as it attempts to regulate the morality... lawful conduct of its immoral citizens.

Our Constitutional Republic is not suited for any but a moral and religious people... a people capable of self-restraint don't need the hand of government to guide them in every form of their enterprise and social discourse.  A moral people are in fact self-regulated, governed... sovereigns of their own lives, capable of keeping their social discourse lawful... peaceful and ordered. An unruly and immoral people are not restrained from within and must therefore be restrained by government.

Comment by Oleg Gielman on August 12, 2014 at 8:16am
Oren, the crime and gangs "exploded" into existence soon after We The People placed our reliance on the constitutional gov't and neglected their Committees of Safety (COS) ...COS must always be our primary (and separate)* gov't, they are the basis and foundation of The Constitutional gov't (framework)! ...bottom up, bottom being most significant, strongest, reliable, trustworthy, etc.
*primary duties being overseers of The Constitutional gov't to ensure they always operate within The US Constitution, as well as local and regional public safety.

LIGHTER SIDE

Facebook & Twitter

ALERT ALERT

BREAKING: Hillary Admits She Was Wrong About ‘Deplorables,’
White Nationalists Only ‘0.15%’ Of U.S. Population

(TeaParty.org) – Hillary Clinton, the failed liberal presidential candidate who sealed her fate by slamming half of U.S. voters as a load of racist, sexist, xenophobic “deplorables,” just came out and admitted she was wrong, Breitbart reports.

Speaking with Hugh Hewitt on his radio show about her book “What Happened,” he asked her if she actually believes that half of the American population are white nationalists and racists.

“Of the 62.9 million people who voted for President Trump, do you have a number in your mind that you think are actually white nationalist racists of that 62.9 million, a real number?” he asked.

“No, I don’t,” she said.

Still have any doubts? Later in the conversation, Hewitt asked the same question again. “Do you think there are more than a half million, you know, honest-to-God white nationalists running around the United States?”

Clinton: “Probably not, no.”

A white nationalist would like to establish a sovereign country for people of white European heritage, an idea everyone across the political spectrum finds unspeakably intolerable and offensive. Now, the woman who declared that this was the desire of more than half of Americans is saying that virtually nobody wants it. On both counts, she’s completely wrong.

There’s no doubt that Clinton is probably going to try running again for president in 2020 – if she’s even alive that long – and might be trying to absolve her guilt and pander to all those “undecideds” who instantly went MAGA the second she blasted them as no-good racist deplorables for not voting Democrat.

However, Clinton did later admit that there were more white nationalists in America than she had thought. Expressing her worries that the internet and the presidency of Trump is giving them a voice and a platform, she hinted that under her iron scepter, she will attempt to silence them.

“Unfortunately, their views, which used to be quite beyond the mainstream, you know, have a much broader audience now, because you know, of being online and having outlets and media presence that can promote those attitudes,” she said.

How many white nationalists are there in the United States? That’s a question with troublingly few answers, since for some mysterious reason the liberal mainstream media – even though it claims all the time that white supremacy is on the rise – hasn’t actually bothered to take polls and just ask people whether they are white nationalists.

Actually, there’s a simple answer to that. If such a poll were to be taken, our bet is that liberals would be very disappointed to discover that almost nobody is actually a white nationalist, and so there would be no way they could continue scaring people with those fears. A tactic Clinton has apparently given up on.

Left-wingers are entirely convinced that some vague but large majority of people who say they aren’t racists or white nationalists, actually share a lot of views with them – which is why Nazi and white supremacist have become interchangeable with Republican and libertarian.

An article by Newsweek, which polled around 5,000 in order address this very question, came up with this response:

About 70 percent of respondents strongly agreed that people of different races should be “free to live wherever they choose” and that “all races are equal,” and 89 percent agreed that all races should be treated equally. At the same time, 31 percent of respondents said they strongly or somewhat agreed that the country needs to “protect and preserve its White European heritage,” while 34 percent strongly or somewhat disagreed and 29 percent said they neither agreed nor disagreed.

Reality is, it’s a little true that some Americans do have overlapping views with white nationalists, but the overwhelming majority of respondents STRONGLY believe that the races should be free, are equal, and should be treated equally. Sounds like none of these respondents would be joining a lynch mob or waging a second Holocaust any time soon – trying to equate the preservation of white heritage with support for slavery and genocide is obviously one of the Left’s biggest lies, and the very reason why 39 percent of people in this same survey believe white people are under attack.

So Clinton changes her mind, and now says she believes less than one percent of the American population are white nationalists – did she believe there were even LESS than that during the campaign trail? Either way, she’s either just lying or plain stupid.

YES PATRIOT STORE

© 2017   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service