Judge Jeanine Pirro: Who Are You to Tell Me How Many Bullets I Need to Protect Myself

May 3, 2013 - From Judge Jeanine Pirro speech today at the NRA-ILA Leadership Forum

  • Currently 5/5 stars.

Views: 1164


You need to be a member of Tea Party Command Center to add comments!

Join Tea Party Command Center

Comment by Debra A Shawver on May 6, 2013 at 3:04am

I will take as many as I can get..unfortunately DHS seems to be buying them faster than  we can....

Comment by Ronald paige on May 5, 2013 at 8:34pm
You tell em mama!!!!!!!!!!!! At last some common sense!
Comment by Ronald Chappell on May 5, 2013 at 3:29pm

Love you Judge.

Comment by Mary Ann West on May 5, 2013 at 2:00pm

From M. West: I need to make a correction for my post below: Change Jim Wilson (R) Texas to Charlie Wilson (R) Texas. Now you will remember him: "Charlie Wilson's War". Thanks.

Comment by Mary Ann West on May 5, 2013 at 1:10pm

My 2 cents. With all the so called "smart" people and all the educated people that are "granted" an education: why in hell is this country in the mess it is in??? H. Clinton is a lawyer. She & her husband have gotten away with stealing, outright lying, dismissing people's lives (Benghazi), besides "What difference does it make now" attitude when MURDER has no statute of limitations!! She is a "congenital liar, Sociopath (as is Billy) and the USA has to stomach them being rammed down the people's throat every day! Both Clintons have LIED before Congress and are still on the scene.  The US gov't is an entity" that does not give a damn about anything but $$$ signs and POWER!! THAT IS What is going on in USA. Many big names like Kennedy, Rockefeller, Chase, Hearst, and many others have committed crimes but get away with them!  Now, I like Pirro I  like Dr. Oz. But What difference do they make? This country is a train wreck and will only get worse because the "people" always attack each other. We must get PAST backbitting  E. Ducy and all of you who loose sight of why we are all here & focus on tearing others down. "What difference does it make" if one says something that one does not "like"? We are all here to preserve USA and FREEDOM!! This type of behavior always surfaces during a discussion when one looses sight of the "prize"!! THIS is what politicians are working toward: getting people to fight each other over trivial personal things that tear groups apart! Infighting ALWAYS destroys cohesiveness to beat back the devil. FOCUS on preserving USA??  THAT is what is destroying FREEDOM! Pirro IS NOT what makes Benghazi important!! Hiding the true objective is what the deceivers do best. THAT is why people must keep the Constitution of the US first and foremost as the objective. Lawyers and Doctors are more educated but are still just another human being in God's Plan! People place too much confidence in Doctors and lawyers as well as other "licensed"  "educated" persons! Too many say they are educated and know better than uneducated people. Get a grip!! Even educated people have to have "sense" enough to see "reality" and truth! Belief in something far greater than oneself, desire to accept and stand for truth has to top "education". Scientists do not know everything. Lawyers: as well as all humans are always trying to figure out how to"beat" the rest of us!! Doctors do not know everything! Just because a doctor or lawyer, judge, politician, or any one goes to church or has "religion" does not trump the idea that one "knows" what is best for everyone else!!! Remember; "It takes a Village"? What is the difference in Democrat and Republican?? I have not seen what makes an "honest" difference!! PEOPLE is what will cause the downfall of USA!! DAVID WALLIN: THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE!! You are RIGHT ON!!! This country would not be in jeopardy if one politician stood for the USA!! All it took for USA to become a Muslim dictatorship was Jim Wilson(R) Texas to give Osama Ben Laden money, training and advanced weapons. Sen. Wilson and every "individual" who was given power to aid one country against another has aided and assisted the enemy to harm USA!! NO individual can have that kind of power if USA is to exist and US Constitution stand! NO one person can be allowed to make such decisions!! That in itself is dictatorship--simple as that! This gov't has allowed these insidious destructive forces to chip away at the US Constitution just for self serving concepts!

Comment by Shirley Williams on May 5, 2013 at 4:08am

I started watching her on Fox several weeks ago. She does a great job exposing the Benghazi fiasco. She was also listed on that map as a gun owner. Being a Judge she knew it was illegal. If she is a schill she sure knows how to hide it.

Comment by Edward Ducy on May 4, 2013 at 7:11pm

David Wallin- where is your proof against Judge Jeanine Pirro?  Do you have evidence to back up your statement?

Comment by Randy P Ward on May 4, 2013 at 6:02pm

If I wasn't married I would Marry this Intelligent woman we more like here who are not to tell the truth

Comment by Adolfo O. Perez on May 4, 2013 at 5:26pm

You got to love a hot woman with a gun and an OPINION.

Comment by brendon bailie on May 4, 2013 at 3:32pm

thank god for judge jeanine pirro,we need politicians who will stand for the constitution



Reporter Kicked Out Of Michelle Obama
Conference For Violating ‘Black Girl Code’

The Black Entertainment Television channel recently hosted a conference in south Florida for black women known as “Leading Women Defined,” which featured a casual conversation between former first lady Michelle Obama and former senior White House adviser Valerie Jarrett.

But according to the New York Post’s Page Six, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist who was in attendance was booted from the remainder of the conference after she wrote an article about some of the comments Obama had made during the discussion.

Robin Givhan, a fashion critic and staff writer for The Washington Post, documented the highlights of the friendly chat between Obama and Jarrett.

Some of the highlights of the conversation included the former first lady’s thoughts on President Donald Trump’s inauguration as the Obamas prepared to leave the White House, the role she played during the 2008 election, her difficulty settling in as “the spouse” to the president, how she described her White House garden as a “subversive act” to garner trust with the public and her upcoming memoir. Of course Givhan also wrote about what Obama was wearing … after all, she is a fashion critic.

But following the publication of the article, according to Page Six, BET demanded Givhan leave the conference early amid claims that she had violated a “sacred space” by publishing the content of the conversation.

They also canceled a panel discussion that Givhan initially had been asked to moderate.

However, Page Six noted that BET’s claim that Obama’s discussion was “private” and not intended to be shared with anyone else outside the small gathering in attendance didn’t hold up to scrutiny given the fact that BET itself posted clips from the discussion on its site.

Furthermore, Jarrett also posted those clips on social media and told everyone to “tune in” to the network so they could hear what Obama had to say.

Shortly thereafter, the dispute descended into a sharp back-and-forth on social media between Givhan and others who were irked at what she had done, as can be seen on Givhan’s Twitter feed.

Several of her critics asserted that the conversation had been “off-the-record” — an assertion Givhan flatly denied — and one user claimed the reporter had “violated a sacred trust” between black women.

Another said what she had done was a “complete violation of journalistic ethics and Black girl code, all at once,” while still another asserted through a hashtag that Givhan was “#notoneofus,” as if she were being banished from the exclusive realm of accepted professional black women.

For their part, a BET representative told Page Six that Givhan had been “invited as a guest (not working press) to moderate a fashion panel,” and noted that her travel and lodging expenses had been paid for by the network.

“She was made aware that it was an intimate conversation in a sacred space of sisterhood and fellowship,” the rep added.

Neither Givhan nor representatives for Obama responded to requests for comment on the report from Page Six.

If the WaPo reporter really was instructed ahead of time that the conversation between Obama and Jarrett was “off the record” and a private affair, but published anyway, then BET was justified in booting her from the remainder of the conference — though the mean-spirited commentary she received on social media still crossed the line.

But if Givhan received no prior warning on the matter — and given the fact that BET itself published the conversation later — then this is just a major display of hypocrisy and unnecessary infighting.

What do you think?


© 2018   Created by Steve - Ning Creator.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service